미국 상사법의 개별입법화 동향

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the jurisdiction of US private laws belongs to each state, there basically exists no federal law with respect to private matters. Therefore the modernization and unification of commercial laws enacted by each state has become the major concern. The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and the American Law Institute, with the cooperation of the American Bar Association, enacted the Uniform Commercial Code(UCC) in 1952 and has revised it continuously thereafter.
However, the UCC does not cover all corporate laws and its contents are only composed of some parts of Korean Civil Code and Commercial Code. Therefore, the Corporate Section of American Bar Association enacted the Model Business Corporation Act in 1950, which becomes the model law of state corporation laws. Regarding US insurance law, even though there is no model act, the New York Insurance Law and the California Insurance Law play major role in this field. As the jurisdiction of maritime law belongs to the federal government, several maritime laws are enacted as federal laws.
This study analyzes US commercial laws in terms of general provision, corporation law, insurance law and maritime law by comparing Korean laws. It concludes that since the legal system of US commercial laws is quite different from that of Korean laws, it is not relevant to adopt US commercial law system to Korea.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서설
• Ⅱ. 상법총칙 - 상행위편
• Ⅲ. 회사편
• Ⅳ. 보험편
• Ⅴ. 해상편
• Ⅵ. 결어
• 參考文獻
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이균성, "해상운송법 in: 한미상사법비교연구" 한국상사법학회 1982

2 양승규, "보험법 in: 한미상사법비교연구" 한국상사법학회 1982

3 김순석, "미국의 배당규제와 자기주식 제도" 한국비교사법학회 13 (13): 251-283, 2006

4 김성호, "미국 보험법상 담보위험의 범위와 무면허ㆍ음주운전 면책약관 in: 판례실무연구[Ⅱ]" 박영사 1998

5 금융감독위원회, "미국 기업회계법(Sarbanes- Oxley Act)"

6 김순석, "미국 기업개혁법(Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) 우리나라에 대한 시사점" 한국상장회사협의회 (47) : 2003

7 김순석, "미국 감사위원회 제도의 최근 동향과 시사점 in: 상법학의 전망(평성 임홍근 교수 정년퇴임기념논문집)" 법문사 2003

8 권종호, "감사제도의 개선과 감사위원회제도의 과제" 19 (19): 2001

9 河村賢治, "米國における企業統治改革の最新動向" (1636) : 2002

10 송상현, "[제4판]해상법원론" 박영사 2008

11 "United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U.S. 533"

12 Bradford Stone, "Uniform Commercial Code in a Nutshell, 5th ed" West 2002

13 "U.S.C.A. Const. Art. Ⅲ §2, cl. 1"

14 "U.S.C.A. Const. Art. Ⅰ §8, cl. 9"

15 "U.S.C.A. Const. Art. I § 8, cl. 3"

16 "U.S. Const. Art. Ⅲ, §2"

17 Craig Still, "Thinking Outside the Box ― The Application of COGSA’s $500 Per-Package Limitation to Shipping Containers" 24 (24): 2001

18 Robert W. Hamilton, "The Revised Model Business Corporation Act: Reflections of a Reporter" 63 (63): 1985

19 William R. Casto, "The Origins of Federal Admiralty Jurisdiction in an Age of Privateers, Smugglers, and Pirates" 37 (37): 1993

20 "The McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. §1011-1015"

21 "Standard Relating to Listed Company Audit Committees, Release Nos. 33-8220, 34-47654"

22 SEC, "Standard Relating to Listed Company Audit Committees, Release Nos. 33-8220, 34-47654"

23 Curtis Milhaupt, "Sarbanes-Oxley as Implemented by the SEC: A Preliminary Evaluation of Its Significance for U.S. and Foreign Firms(and their Advisors)(미국의 기업지배구조와 Sarbanes-Oxley법)" 한국증권법학회 2003

24 "Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co., 358 U.S. 354, 360-61 (1959), rehearing denied 359 U.S. 962 (1959)"

25 Raymond A. Guenter, "Rediscovering the McCarran-Ferguson Act's Commerce Clause Limitation" 6 (6): 2000

26 "Pub. L. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745"

27 Peter N. Swisher, "Principles of Insurance Law, rev. 3rd ed" LexixNexis 2006

28 Emeric Fisher, "Principles of Insurance Law, rev. 3rd ed" LexixNexis 2006

29 "Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. 168"

30 "N.Y. Ins. L. §3203"

31 ABA Section of Business Law, "Model Business Corporation Act Annotated 4th ed., vol. 1"

32 Jonathan R. Macey, "Macey on Corporation Laws, vol. 1" Aspen Law & Business 2008

33 Jonathan R. Macey, "Macey on Corporation Laws, vol. 1" Aspen Law & Business 39-, 2008

34 "Liverpool & G.W. Stem Co. v. Phenix Ins. Co., 129 U.S. 397"

35 Spencer Kimbell, "Legislative Control of the Terms of Insurance Contracts" 39 (39): 1964

36 Kenneth S. Abraham, "Insurance Law and Regulation 4th ed" Foundation Press 2005

37 "Harbert Intern. Establishment v. Power Shipping, 635 F.2d 370 (5th. Cir. 1981)"

38 William W. Adams, "Constitutional History - Development of Admiralty Jurisdiction in the United States" 8 (8): 1986

39 Meagan Leary, "Comment, Say What You Mean and What You Say: Edging Toward a Workable Container Solution" 28 (28): 2003

40 "California Insurance Code, Stats. 1935, c. 145"

41 "COGSA §4⑸"

42 "COGSA §4⑷"

43 "COGSA §4⑵⒬"

44 "COGSA §4⑵⒜~⒬"

45 "COGSA §4⑵"

46 "COGSA §4⑴"

47 "COGSA §3⑻"

48 "COGSA §3⑵"

49 "COGSA §3⑴"

50 "COGSA §2"

51 "COGSA §1⒠"

52 "COGSA §1⒝"

53 "COGSA §12"

54 SEC, "Audit Committee, Release No. 34-42266"

55 Thomas J. Schoenbaum, "Admiralty and Maritime Law, 4th ed" Thomson West 2004

56 Robert M. Jarvis, "Admiralty - Cases and Materials" LexisNexis 2004

57 "49 U.S.C. §§80101-80116"

58 "49 U.S.C. §80113⒟⑵"

59 "49 U.S.C. §80113⒜"

60 "49 U.S.C. §80102"

61 정영석, "1999년 美國 海上物件運送法 改正案의 槪論的 考察" 한국해법학회 24 (24): 5-43, 2002

62 "15 U.S.C.A. §1012(b)"