슈퍼바이지 애착 전략 척도(Supervisee Attachment Strategies Scale) 국내 타당화 연구 = A Development and Validation of the Korean Version of the Supervisee Attachment Strategies Scale

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of the Supervisee Attachment Strategies Scale (SASS; Menefee, Day, Lopez, & McPherson, 2014) to measure supervisee's adult attachment toward supervisor. 22 items of the original scale were translated from English to Korean. Data include 228 counselors who have received supervision at least three times in the last 2 years from more than one supervisor as well as counselors currently under supervision. In addition to correlation analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to confirm factor structure property, reliability, and validity. Results showed the extraction of two sub-factors: Avoidance and Rejection, and showed proper Cronbach's alpha. SASS showed negative correlation with WAI-T and SSQ and positive correlation with RCRAI and ECR, which confirms the significant concurrent validity and convergent validity of SASS. Each sub-factor of SASS independently explained supervisee's adult attachment. Implications and limitations were discussed.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 Menefee, Day, Lopez와 McPherson(2014)이 슈퍼바이저에 대한 슈퍼바이지의 애착 전략을 측정하기 위해 개발한 슈퍼바이지 애착 전략 척도(SASS)를 국내 슈퍼바이지들을 대상으로 타당화하기 위해 실시되었다. 이를 위해 원척도의 22문항을 번안 및 역번안 작업을 거친 후 척도를 구성하였다. 자료 수집은 최근 2년 동안 한 명 이상의 슈퍼바이저에게 최소 3회 이상 슈퍼비전을 받은 경험이 있거나 현재 받고 있는 전국의 상담자 228명(남자 32명, 여자 195명, 성별무응답 1명)을 대상으로 이루어졌다. 자료를 바탕으로 SASS 요인구조의 적절성을 확보하기 위해 탐색적 및 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였고 신뢰도와 타당도를 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 본 연구에서는 원척도와 동일하게 2개의 하위요인(회피, 거절)이 추출되었고 내적일치도 역시 적절한 것으로 확인되었다. 둘째, SASS는 작업동맹 척도(WAI-T), 슈퍼비전 만족도(SSQ)와 부적 상관관계를 보였고, 역할갈등 역할모호 척도(RCRAI)와 친밀관계 경험척도(ECR)는 정적 상관관계를 보였다. 따라서 SASS는 유의한 공인, 수렴타당도를 나타낸다고 할 수 있다. 이러한 결과들은 SASS의 각 하위요인이 독립적으로 슈퍼바이지의 성인 애착을 설명하고 있음을 보여준다. 마지막으로 본 연구결과를 바탕으로 시사점과 제한점에 대해 논의하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 문수백, "학위논문작성을 위한 연구방법의실제" 학지사 2003

2 김성현, "친밀 관계 경험 검사 개정판 타당화 연구 : 확증적 요인분석과 문항 반응 이론을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2004

3 최한나, "좋은 수퍼비전 관계에 대한 수퍼바이지의 인식 차원" 한국상담심리학회 20 (20): 1-21, 2008

4 한국상담학회, "전문상담사 자격규정. 학회규정집" 2015

5 김동민, "음악치료 집단 수퍼비전에서 수퍼바이지가 지각하는 애착유형, 자기효능감, 정서적 유대, 수치심, 평가불안 간의 관계" 한국음악치료학회 14 (14): 1-27, 2012

6 손은정, "수퍼비전 작업 동맹과 상담자 경력 수준이 역할 어려움과 수퍼비전 만족도에 미치는 영향" 한국상담심리학회 18 (18): 695-712, 2006

7 이수현, "수퍼비전 기대 척도 개발 및 타당화" 한국상담심리학회 21 (21): 417-437, 2009

8 지승희, "수퍼비전 경험과 되고 싶은수퍼바이저 상에 관한 탐색적 연구" 한국상담학회 15 (15): 1671-1693, 2014

9 박진희, "수퍼바이지의 성인애착이 놀이치료 수퍼비전 과정에서 자기개방에 미치는 영향:작업동맹의 매개효과를 중심으로" 한국상담학회 12 (12): 129-142, 2011

10 홍지영, "수퍼바이저 스타일이 수퍼비전 작업동맹과 수퍼비전 만족도에 미치는 영향" 한국상담학회 9 (9): 1489-1504, 2008

11 손은정, "상담자의 자기 성찰(reflection)과 전문성 발달" 한국상담학회 4 (4): 367-380, 2003

12 한국상담심리학회, "상담심리사 수련과정시행세칙"

13 엄명용, "사회복지실천과 척도개발" 학지사 2005

14 최수미, "부정문항이 포함된 척도의 요인구조 및 방법효과 검증과 남녀 간의 차이 비교: Rosenberg 자기존중감 척도를 중심으로" 한국심리학회 32 (32): 571-589, 2013

15 윤소영, "놀이치료자의 평가에 대한 두려움과 수퍼비전에서의 개방" 숙명여자대학교 사회교육대학원 2006

16 Olk, M., "Trainees’experiences of role conflict and role ambiguity in supervisory relationships" 39 (39): 389-397, 1992

17 Gunn, J. E., "Trainee supervisor attachment : explaining the alliance and disclosure in supervision" 6 (6): 229-237, 2012

18 Mehr, K., "Trainee nondisclosure in supervision: What are they not telling you?" 10 (10): 103-113, 2010

19 Skovholt, T. M., "Themes in therapist and counselor development" 70 (70): 505-515, 1992

20 Foster, J. T., "The supervisory attachment relationship as a predictor of the professional development of the supervisee" 17 (17): 343-350, 2007

21 Ladany, N., "The relationship between the supervisory working alliance and trainees’ experience of role conflict and role ambiguity" 34 (34): 220-231, 1995

22 Lainas, H. L., "The relationship between supervisory working alliance and sueprvisses’ client outcomes" 2014

23 Ladany, N., "The nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors" 43 (43): 10-24, 1996

24 Nasser, F., "The effect of using item parcels on ad goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis : An example using Sarason’s reactions to tests" 16 (16): 75-97, 2003

25 Epps, A. M., "The Effect of attachment styles on the working alliance in counselor supervision" 1999

26 Tanaka, S. J., "Testing structural equation model" Sage 10-39, 1993

27 Ladany, N., "Supervisor self-disclosure : Balancing the uncontrollable narcissist with the indomotable altruist" 59 (59): 611-621, 2003

28 White, V. E., "Supervisor and supervisee attachments and social provisions related to the supervisory working alliance" 42 (42): 203-218, 2003

29 Ronnestad, M. H., "Supervision of beginning and advanced graduate students of counseling and psychotherapy" 71 (71): 396-405, 1993

30 Holloway, E. L., "Supervision : Its contributions to treatment efficacy" 63 (63): 207-213, 1995

31 Stoltenberg, C. D., "Supervising counselors and therapists: A developmental perspective" Jossey-Bass 1987

32 West, S. G., "Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications" Sage 56-75, 1995

33 Baldwin, M. W., "Socialcognitive conceptualization of attachment working models : Availability and accessibility effects" 71 (71): 94-109, 1996

34 Hazan, C., "Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process" 52 (52): 511-524, 1987

35 Biddle, B. J., "Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors" Academic Press 1979

36 Bahrick, A., "Role induction for counselor trainees: effects on the supervisory working alliance" 1989

37 Lambert, M., "Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome" 38 (38): 357-361, 2001

38 Ladany, N., "Psychotherapy supervision; How dressed is the emperor" 37 : 14-18, 2002

39 Watkins, C. E., "Psychotherapy supervision in the 21st century : Some pressing needs and impressing possibilities" 7 (7): 93-101, 1998

40 Menefee, D. S., "Preliminary development and validation of the supervisee attachment strategies scales(SASS)" 61 (61): 232-240, 2014

41 Aasheim, L. L., "Practical Clinical Supervision for Counselors: An Experiential Guide" Springer Publishing Company 2012

42 Ainsworth, M. D. S., "Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation" Erlbaum 1978

43 Watkins, C. E., "Pathological attachment styles in psychotherapy supervision" 32 (32): 333-340, 1995

44 Yourman, D. B., "Nondisclosure and distortion in psychotherapy supervision" 33 (33): 567-575, 1996

45 Tabachnick, B. G., "Multivariate statistics" Allyn 2001

46 Efstation, J. F., "Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision" 37 (37): 322-329, 1990

47 Holloway, E. L., "Handbook of counseling psychology" Wiley 177-214, 1992

48 Bennett, S., "General and supervisionspecific attachment styles : Relations to student perceptions of field supervisors" 44 (44): 75-94, 2008

49 Bernard, J. M., "Fundamentals of clinical supervision" Pearson 2004

50 Friedlander, M. L., "Effects of role conflict on counselor trainees' self-statements, anxiety level, and performance" 33 (33): 73-77, 1986

51 Fisher, B., "Differences between supervision of beginning and advanced therapists : Hogan’s hypothesis empirically revisited" 7 (7): 57-74, 1989

52 Holloway, E. L., "Developmental models of supervision: Is it development?" 18 (18): 138-140, 1987

53 Neswald-McCalip, R., "Development of the secure counselor : case examples supporting Pistole & Watkins’s(1995)discussion of attachment theory in counseling supervision" 41 (41): 18-27, 2001

54 Shim, S. S., "Cultural landscapes of pastoral counseling in Asia : The case of Korea with a supervisory perspective" 5 (5): 77-97, 2002

55 Ellis, M. V., "Critical incidents in clinical supervision and in supervisor supervision : Assessing supervisory issues" 38 (38): 342-349, 1991

56 Ladany, N., "Critical events in psychotherapy supervision:An interpersonal approach" American Psychological Association 2005

57 Bradley, L. J., "Counselor supervision: Principles, process, and practice" Routledge 2001

58 Wiley, M. O., "Counseling supervision by developmental level" 33 (33): 439-445, 1986

59 Ward, C. C., "Counseling supervision : A reflective model" 38 (38): 23-33, 1998

60 Hamilton, C. E., "Continuity and discontinuity of attachment from infancy through adolescence" 71 (71): 690-694, 2000

61 Holloway, E. L., "Clinical supervision: A systems approach" Sage Publications 1995

62 Chen, E. C., "Attachment, group attraction, and self-other agreement in interpersonal circumplex problems and perceptions of group members" 6 (6): 311-324, 2002

63 Pistole, M. C., "Attachment theory, counseling process, and supervision" 23 (23): 457-478, 1995

64 Pistole, M. C., "Attachment theory in supervision : A critical incident experience" 47 (47): 193-205, 2008

65 Brennan, K. A., "Attachment theory and close relationships" The Guilford Press 46-76, 1998

66 Kirkpatrick, L. A., "Attachment styles and close relationships : a four-year prospective study" 1 (1): 123-142, 1994

67 Bartholomew, K., "Attachment styles among young adult : A test of a four-category model" 61 (61): 226-244, 1991

68 Riggs, S. A., "Attachment processes in the supervisory relationship : An exploratory investigation" 37 (37): 558-566, 2006

69 Larsen, D. L., "Assessment of client/patient satisfaction : Development of a general scale" 2 (2): 197-207, 1979

70 Lizzo, A., "Approaches to learning in professional supervision : Supervisee perceptions of processes and outcome" 27 (27): 239-256, 2005

71 Horvath, A. O., "Alliance in individual psychotherapy" 48 (48): 9-16, 2011

72 Bordin, E. S., "A working alliance based model of supervision" 11 (11): 35-42, 1983

73 Bowlby, J., "A secure base" Basic Books 1988

74 Worthen, V., "A phenomenological investigation of"good"supervision events" 43 (43): 25-34, 1996