RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      일개 대학 의과대학생의 입학전형별 학업성과는 어떠한가? = How medical students perform academically by admission types?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103847078

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Despite the importance of selecting students whom are capable for medical education and to become a good doctor, not enough studies have been done in the category. This study focused on analysing the medical students' academic performance (grade point average, GPA) differences, flunk and dropout rates by admission types. Methods: From 2004 to 2010, we gathered 369 Konyang University College of Medicine's students admission data and analyzed the differences between admission method and academic achievement, differences in failure and dropout rates. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), ordinary least square, and logistic regression were used. Results: The rolling students showed higher academic achievement from year 1 to 3 than regular students (p<0.01). Using admission type variable as control variable in multiple regression model similar results were shown. But unlike the results of ANOVA, GPA differences by admission types were shown not only in lower academic years but also in year 6 (p<0.01). From the regression analysis of flunk and dropout rate by admission types, regular admission type students showed higher drop out rate than the rolling ones which demonstrates admission types gives significant effect on flunk or dropout rates in medical students (p<0.01). Conclusion: The rolling admissions type students tend to show lower flunk rate and dropout rates and perform better academically. This implies selecting students primarily by Korean College Scholastic Ability Test does not guarantee their academic success in medical education. Thus we suggest a more in-depth comprehensive method of selecting students that are appropriate to individual medical school's educational goal.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Despite the importance of selecting students whom are capable for medical education and to become a good doctor, not enough studies have been done in the category. This study focused on analysing the medical students' academic performance (gr...

      Purpose: Despite the importance of selecting students whom are capable for medical education and to become a good doctor, not enough studies have been done in the category. This study focused on analysing the medical students' academic performance (grade point average, GPA) differences, flunk and dropout rates by admission types. Methods: From 2004 to 2010, we gathered 369 Konyang University College of Medicine's students admission data and analyzed the differences between admission method and academic achievement, differences in failure and dropout rates. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), ordinary least square, and logistic regression were used. Results: The rolling students showed higher academic achievement from year 1 to 3 than regular students (p<0.01). Using admission type variable as control variable in multiple regression model similar results were shown. But unlike the results of ANOVA, GPA differences by admission types were shown not only in lower academic years but also in year 6 (p<0.01). From the regression analysis of flunk and dropout rate by admission types, regular admission type students showed higher drop out rate than the rolling ones which demonstrates admission types gives significant effect on flunk or dropout rates in medical students (p<0.01). Conclusion: The rolling admissions type students tend to show lower flunk rate and dropout rates and perform better academically. This implies selecting students primarily by Korean College Scholastic Ability Test does not guarantee their academic success in medical education. Thus we suggest a more in-depth comprehensive method of selecting students that are appropriate to individual medical school's educational goal.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이상진, "충북대학교 의학전문대학원 학생들의 특성 및 인지적 입학전형요소와 학업성취도의 관계" 한국의학교육학회 21 (21): 59-66, 2009

      2 노혜린, "의학전문대학원 신입생 선발에서의 Multiple Mini-Interview" 한국의학교육학회 21 (21): 103-115, 2009

      3 Edwards JC, "The interview in the admission process" 65 : 167-177, 1990

      4 Kim HW, "The influence of admission characteristics on premedical school achievement at a medical school" 14 : 257-268, 2002

      5 Kim HW, "The influence of admission characteristics on premedical school achievement at a medical school" 14 : 257-268, 2002

      6 Searle J, "Selection for medical school: just pick the right students and the rest is easy!" 37 : 458-463, 2003

      7 Salvatori P, "Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions" 6 : 159-175, 2001

      8 Yates J, "Predicting the "strugglers": a casecontrol study of students at Nottingham University Medical School" 332 : 1009-1013, 2006

      9 "Personal Qualities Assessment"

      10 Rhoads JM, "Motivation, medical school admissions, and student performance" 49 : 1119-1127, 1974

      1 이상진, "충북대학교 의학전문대학원 학생들의 특성 및 인지적 입학전형요소와 학업성취도의 관계" 한국의학교육학회 21 (21): 59-66, 2009

      2 노혜린, "의학전문대학원 신입생 선발에서의 Multiple Mini-Interview" 한국의학교육학회 21 (21): 103-115, 2009

      3 Edwards JC, "The interview in the admission process" 65 : 167-177, 1990

      4 Kim HW, "The influence of admission characteristics on premedical school achievement at a medical school" 14 : 257-268, 2002

      5 Kim HW, "The influence of admission characteristics on premedical school achievement at a medical school" 14 : 257-268, 2002

      6 Searle J, "Selection for medical school: just pick the right students and the rest is easy!" 37 : 458-463, 2003

      7 Salvatori P, "Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions" 6 : 159-175, 2001

      8 Yates J, "Predicting the "strugglers": a casecontrol study of students at Nottingham University Medical School" 332 : 1009-1013, 2006

      9 "Personal Qualities Assessment"

      10 Rhoads JM, "Motivation, medical school admissions, and student performance" 49 : 1119-1127, 1974

      11 Hur Y, "Medical student academic achievement by method of admission" 45 (45): 13-, 2011

      12 Ferguson E, "Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature" 324 : 952-957, 2002

      13 Arulampalam W, "Dropping out of medical school in the UK: explaining the changes over ten years" 41 : 385-394, 2007

      14 Lumsden MA, "Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school" 39 : 258-265, 2005

      15 Parry J, "Admissions processes for five year medical courses at English schools: review" 332 : 1005-1009, 2006

      16 van der Vleuten C, "A paradigm shift in education: how to proceed with assessment?" 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-07-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국의학교육 -> Korean Journal of Medical Education
      외국어명 : korean journal of medical education -> 미등록
      KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.02 1.02 0.76
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.82 0.76 1.204 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼