RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    모델의 불확실성을 반영한 준거가격효과의 모형화 = Modeling Consumer Response to Reference Prices. Model Uncertainty - Based Perspective

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104355226

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The impact of reference prices on brand choice behavior has been modeled previously with both sticker shock and reference-dependent formulations. In the former model, reference prices impact choice via a "sticker shock" term, the difference between brand-specific reference prices and current prices while the latter model captures asymmetric responses to positive and negative Price deviations from a category-specific reference price. Though both models are well-grounded in psychological theory, they involve different choice and reference price formation processes, and impose different burdens on consumer memory. Both models been empirically validated in previous studies. However, previous empirical tests of these formulations have assumed that only one of these models holds for all consumers, ignoring the underlying structural uncertainty, i.e., the possibility that each process might be equally valid for different sets of consumers. In addition, an overwhelming majority of these studies have also either ignored price response heterogeneity, or modeled it using a latent segment approach, leaving open the possibility that unaccounted for heterogeneity may have biased the estimated reference price effects. This paper develops an integrated model that incorporates structural uncertainty and also models parameter heterogeneity at the household level using a Bayesian hierarchical framework. Specifically, the model does not assume that every consumer follows the same decision rule. Thus, some consumers follow the sticker shock model, because they have sufficient cognitive capacity and motivation to recall and use brand-specific shelf-prices, while others follow the reference-dependent structure and use a single, category-specific, reference price to decrease their cognitive burden. Response heterogeneity is modeled using a continuous random effects model that produces household-level coefficients and avoids the problem of residual segment-level heterogeneity. The model is estimated on scanner panel data from the ketchup category and outperforms hierarchical Bayes versions of the "pure" reference dependent model and the sticker shock model. On average, half the sample households in the ketchup category are found to be well described by the reference dependent structure and the rest by the sticker shock structure. Interestingly, the mean sticker shock coefficient is statistically indistinguishable from zero, i.e., there is no evidence for the existence of a sticker shock effect even after accounting for structural uncertainty. Overall, the proposed model provides a richer and more accurate description of the consumer choice process than simpler models that ignore model uncertainty and permit only a single model structure.
    번역하기

    The impact of reference prices on brand choice behavior has been modeled previously with both sticker shock and reference-dependent formulations. In the former model, reference prices impact choice via a "sticker shock" term, the difference between br...

    The impact of reference prices on brand choice behavior has been modeled previously with both sticker shock and reference-dependent formulations. In the former model, reference prices impact choice via a "sticker shock" term, the difference between brand-specific reference prices and current prices while the latter model captures asymmetric responses to positive and negative Price deviations from a category-specific reference price. Though both models are well-grounded in psychological theory, they involve different choice and reference price formation processes, and impose different burdens on consumer memory. Both models been empirically validated in previous studies. However, previous empirical tests of these formulations have assumed that only one of these models holds for all consumers, ignoring the underlying structural uncertainty, i.e., the possibility that each process might be equally valid for different sets of consumers. In addition, an overwhelming majority of these studies have also either ignored price response heterogeneity, or modeled it using a latent segment approach, leaving open the possibility that unaccounted for heterogeneity may have biased the estimated reference price effects. This paper develops an integrated model that incorporates structural uncertainty and also models parameter heterogeneity at the household level using a Bayesian hierarchical framework. Specifically, the model does not assume that every consumer follows the same decision rule. Thus, some consumers follow the sticker shock model, because they have sufficient cognitive capacity and motivation to recall and use brand-specific shelf-prices, while others follow the reference-dependent structure and use a single, category-specific, reference price to decrease their cognitive burden. Response heterogeneity is modeled using a continuous random effects model that produces household-level coefficients and avoids the problem of residual segment-level heterogeneity. The model is estimated on scanner panel data from the ketchup category and outperforms hierarchical Bayes versions of the "pure" reference dependent model and the sticker shock model. On average, half the sample households in the ketchup category are found to be well described by the reference dependent structure and the rest by the sticker shock structure. Interestingly, the mean sticker shock coefficient is statistically indistinguishable from zero, i.e., there is no evidence for the existence of a sticker shock effect even after accounting for structural uncertainty. Overall, the proposed model provides a richer and more accurate description of the consumer choice process than simpler models that ignore model uncertainty and permit only a single model structure.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
    더보기
    해외이동버튼