RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    우주자원의 사적 소유에 관한 입법 필요성 및 바람직한 정책 방향 설정에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the Legislative Necessity and Desirable Policy Directions about the Private Ownership of Space Resources

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108997213

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Republic of Korea signed the Artemis Accords on May 24, 2021, and the nature of the Artemis Accords could be the soft law or governance regime because it just makes the political commitment not legally binding, and that brings the question whether the legislation of the private ownership of space resources is necessary because of the Principle of Good Faith. Even if there has been a controversy so far, it is impossible to interpret that the Space Treaty prohibits the private ownership of space resources, and so it is necessary to interpret that it permits the one to facilitate the human's prosperity through space development. However, it is so controversial to interpret that the Space Treaty admits the private ownership of space resources, and there are many parts to be improved in the Artemis Accords and some countries' national space resources law such as the environmental problem or the international conflict owing to permitting the private ownership of space resources. In this situation, it is not wise to try to make a national enactment about the private ownership of space resources rapidly in terms of the national interest as well as the profit of human beings. It is desirable to do our best to make the international regime to resolve the predicted problems on account of permitting the private ownership of space resources, and to try to make the national enactment related to the one step by step keeping pace with the international regime and consensus.
    번역하기

    The Republic of Korea signed the Artemis Accords on May 24, 2021, and the nature of the Artemis Accords could be the soft law or governance regime because it just makes the political commitment not legally binding, and that brings the question whether...

    The Republic of Korea signed the Artemis Accords on May 24, 2021, and the nature of the Artemis Accords could be the soft law or governance regime because it just makes the political commitment not legally binding, and that brings the question whether the legislation of the private ownership of space resources is necessary because of the Principle of Good Faith. Even if there has been a controversy so far, it is impossible to interpret that the Space Treaty prohibits the private ownership of space resources, and so it is necessary to interpret that it permits the one to facilitate the human's prosperity through space development. However, it is so controversial to interpret that the Space Treaty admits the private ownership of space resources, and there are many parts to be improved in the Artemis Accords and some countries' national space resources law such as the environmental problem or the international conflict owing to permitting the private ownership of space resources. In this situation, it is not wise to try to make a national enactment about the private ownership of space resources rapidly in terms of the national interest as well as the profit of human beings. It is desirable to do our best to make the international regime to resolve the predicted problems on account of permitting the private ownership of space resources, and to try to make the national enactment related to the one step by step keeping pace with the international regime and consensus.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼