RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      정부생산성 측정 및 거버넌스와 제도의 영향 분석: OECD 국가의 보건지출을 중심으로 = Measuring government productivity and analyzing the influences of governance and institutions: With focus on the health expenditure of OECD countries

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107184593

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study measured the government health expenditure of 32 OECD countries with a global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index, and then analyzed the influences of governance and institutions on their productivity. Productivity from 2000 to 2015 declined by an annual average of 0.5%. Efficiency and technological change also decreased by a yearly average of 0.4% and 0.1%, respectively. This indicates that the productivity of public health spending decreased by efficiency deterioration rather than technological regress. The influences of governance on the productivity of government health spending show that government effectiveness, political stability, and control of corruption have a positive effect on it, whereas voice and accountability, and rule of law make a negative impact. The effects of fiscal institutions reveal that while fiscal rules and expenditure decentralization exercise a positive impact on the productivity of government health spending, independent fiscal institutions and tax-revenue decentralization have a negative effect. In particular, when independent fiscal institutions are used in conjunction with fiscal rules, the positive effect of independent fiscal institutions is inclined to increase. Concerning political institutions, unitary state, parliamentary system, and proportional representation affect the productivity of government health expenditure positively, while multi-party coalition government influences it, even limitedly, positively.
      번역하기

      This study measured the government health expenditure of 32 OECD countries with a global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index, and then analyzed the influences of governance and institutions on their productivity. Productivity from 2000 to 2015 dec...

      This study measured the government health expenditure of 32 OECD countries with a global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index, and then analyzed the influences of governance and institutions on their productivity. Productivity from 2000 to 2015 declined by an annual average of 0.5%. Efficiency and technological change also decreased by a yearly average of 0.4% and 0.1%, respectively. This indicates that the productivity of public health spending decreased by efficiency deterioration rather than technological regress. The influences of governance on the productivity of government health spending show that government effectiveness, political stability, and control of corruption have a positive effect on it, whereas voice and accountability, and rule of law make a negative impact. The effects of fiscal institutions reveal that while fiscal rules and expenditure decentralization exercise a positive impact on the productivity of government health spending, independent fiscal institutions and tax-revenue decentralization have a negative effect. In particular, when independent fiscal institutions are used in conjunction with fiscal rules, the positive effect of independent fiscal institutions is inclined to increase. Concerning political institutions, unitary state, parliamentary system, and proportional representation affect the productivity of government health expenditure positively, while multi-party coalition government influences it, even limitedly, positively.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 여지영, "한국 보건의료체계 10년의 변화와 성과" 한국보건경제정책학회 20 (20): 123-144, 2014

      2 유금록, "지방하수도공기업의 생산성 및 기술진보 평가" 한국행정학회 46 (46): 157-180, 2012

      3 이영성, "지방정부의 비교경쟁에 따른 재정지출변화가 경제성장에 미치는 영향 - 사회개발비를 중심으로 -" 한국지역학회 30 (30): 27-51, 2014

      4 유금록, "지방정부관료제의 효율성 평가: 보건소를 중심으로" 한국지방재정학회 13 (13): 1-26, 2008

      5 황소하, "지방정부 지출의 공간적 상호작용: 지역 행사 및 축제경비 지출의 비교경쟁(Yardstick Competition)" 한국행정학회 46 (46): 313-343, 2012

      6 강윤호, "지방정부 관료의 동기와 예산 극대화 행태" 33 (33): 189-210, 2000

      7 최영출, "지방분권과 국가경쟁력 및 국민행복도와의 인과관계 분석 : 정책시뮬레이션의 적용" 한국자치행정학회 30 (30): 1-30, 2016

      8 최영출, "지방분권 수준과 영향요인 관계 분석: 재정적 분권을 중심으로" 한국지방정부학회 17 (17): 369-389, 2013

      9 유금록, "지방공기업의 효율성 및 규모수익 평가: 지방하수도공기업에 대한 방향거리함수모형의 적용" 한국행정연구소 50 (50): 67-90, 2012

      10 노화준, "정책학원론: 복잡성과학과의 융합학문적 시각" 박영사 2012

      1 여지영, "한국 보건의료체계 10년의 변화와 성과" 한국보건경제정책학회 20 (20): 123-144, 2014

      2 유금록, "지방하수도공기업의 생산성 및 기술진보 평가" 한국행정학회 46 (46): 157-180, 2012

      3 이영성, "지방정부의 비교경쟁에 따른 재정지출변화가 경제성장에 미치는 영향 - 사회개발비를 중심으로 -" 한국지역학회 30 (30): 27-51, 2014

      4 유금록, "지방정부관료제의 효율성 평가: 보건소를 중심으로" 한국지방재정학회 13 (13): 1-26, 2008

      5 황소하, "지방정부 지출의 공간적 상호작용: 지역 행사 및 축제경비 지출의 비교경쟁(Yardstick Competition)" 한국행정학회 46 (46): 313-343, 2012

      6 강윤호, "지방정부 관료의 동기와 예산 극대화 행태" 33 (33): 189-210, 2000

      7 최영출, "지방분권과 국가경쟁력 및 국민행복도와의 인과관계 분석 : 정책시뮬레이션의 적용" 한국자치행정학회 30 (30): 1-30, 2016

      8 최영출, "지방분권 수준과 영향요인 관계 분석: 재정적 분권을 중심으로" 한국지방정부학회 17 (17): 369-389, 2013

      9 유금록, "지방공기업의 효율성 및 규모수익 평가: 지방하수도공기업에 대한 방향거리함수모형의 적용" 한국행정연구소 50 (50): 67-90, 2012

      10 노화준, "정책학원론: 복잡성과학과의 융합학문적 시각" 박영사 2012

      11 최창현, "정부혁신론: 국가혁신의 길" 대영문화사 2017

      12 박형수, "재정준칙의 필요성 및 도입방안에 관한 연구" 한국조세재정연구원 2006

      13 류덕현, "재정준칙의 재정건전화 효과 분석" 한국재정학회 6 (6): 1-25, 2013

      14 정성호, "재정준칙의 법제화, 선결 조건과 전제 조건" 한국비교정부학회 24 (24): 173-204, 2020

      15 신가희, "재정제도가 재정건전성에 미치는 영향 분석 - 정치제도와의 정합성을 중심으로 -" 한국정책학회 25 (25): 359-383, 2016

      16 이정희, "우리나라 재정준칙체계 제도화에 대한 설계: 미국연방정부와 스웨덴정부의 재정준칙체계의 비교분석을 중심으로" 서울행정학회 27 (27): 295-339, 2016

      17 최병호, "우리나라 보건의료체계의 성과평가: OECD Health Data를 중심으로" 77 : 83-95, 2003

      18 김혜련, "우리나라 건강수준과 보건의료성과의 OECD 국가들과의 비교" 196 : 89-102, 2013

      19 유금록, "외환위기이후지방상수도사업의생산성변화분석" 한국행정학회 36 (36): 281-301, 2002

      20 유금록, "부트스트랩 비방사적 전역 맘퀴스트 생산성지수를 이용한 지방상수도공기업의 생산성과 영향요인 분석" 한국행정학회 52 (52): 167-204, 2018

      21 신현웅, "보건의료정책의 현황과 과제: 지속가능성 확보를 중심으로" 193 : 9-22, 2020

      22 문상호, "보건의료정책과 거버넌스" 2 (2): 163-196, 2007

      23 유금록, "방향거리함수모형을 이용한 지방상수도공기업의 운영효율성과 규모효율성, 규모경제 평가" 한국행정학회 47 (47): 275-311, 2013

      24 유금록, "관계연결망모형을 이용한 공공서비스의 총효율성 및 기간효율성 측정: 서울시 보건소를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 49 (49): 437-471, 2015

      25 유금록, "공공선택론에 의한 관료제의 효율성 평가" 한국정책학회 18 (18): 173-206, 2009

      26 유금록, "공공부문의 효율성 측정과 평가" 대영문화사 2004

      27 유금록, "공공기관 효율성 평가를 위한 새로운 방법론: 비방사적 방향거리 초비효율성지표의 적용" 한국정책분석평가학회 28 (28): 197-217, 2018

      28 정성호, "거버넌스가 경제성장에 미치는 영향" 한국행정연구원 19 (19): 171-202, 2010

      29 이명석, "거버넌스 신드롬" 성균관대학교 출판부 2017

      30 Whitehead, M., "‘In the shadow of hierarchy’: Meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the west midlands" 35 (35): 6-14, 2003

      31 Kaufmann, D., "Worldwide governance indicators 1996-2013" World Bank 2014

      32 McManus, R., "Who does better for the economy? Presidents versus parliamentary democracies" 176 : 361-387, 2018

      33 Kopits, G., "The role of independent fiscal institutions: Developing good practice" 3 : 35-52, 2011

      34 Deprins, D., "The performance of public enterprises: Concepts and measurements" North-Holland 243-267, 1984

      35 Farrell, M. J., "The measurement of productive efficiency" 120 (120): 253-290, 1957

      36 Kyriacou, A. P., "The efficiency of transport infrastructure investment and the role of government quality: An empirical analysis" 74 : 93-102, 2019

      37 Persson, T., "The economic effects of constitutions" MIT Press 2003

      38 Hallerberg, M., "The design of fiscal rules and forms of governance in European Union countries" European Central Bank 2004

      39 Hallerberg, M., "The design of fiscal rules and forms of governance in European Union countries" 23 (23): 338-359, 2007

      40 Bryson, J. M., "The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature" 66 : 44-55, 2006

      41 Prud’homme, R., "The dangers of decentralization" 10 (10): 201-220, 1995

      42 Alesina, A., "The costs and benefits of fiscal rules: Evidence from U.S. states" National Bureau of Economic Research 1996

      43 Rothstein, B., "The Oxford handbook of governance" Oxford University Press 143-154, 2012

      44 International Country Risk Guide, "TABLE 3B: Researcher’s dataset"

      45 Kopits, G., "Restoring public debt sustainability: The role of independent fiscal institutions" Oxford University Press 2013

      46 Foucault, M., "Public spending interactions and local politics: Empirical evidence from French municipalities" 137 : 57-80, 2008

      47 Adam, A., "Public sector efficiency: Leveling the playing field between OECD countries" 146 (146): 163-183, 2011

      48 Afonso, A., "Public sector efficiency: An international comparison" 123 (123): 321-347, 2005

      49 Feeny, S., "Public sector efficiency, foreign aid and small island developing states" 20 (20): 526-546, 2008

      50 Bergman, U. M., "Promoting sustainable public finances in the European Union: The role of fiscal rules and government efficiency" 44 : 1-19, 2016

      51 Kumar, M. S., "Promoting fiscal discipline" International Monetary Fund 1-8, 2007

      52 Novignon, J., "On the efficiency of public health expenditure in Sub-Saharan Africa: Does corruption and quality of public institutions matter?" MRPA 2015

      53 Tulkens, H., "On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit" 4 : 183-210, 1993

      54 OECD, "OECD independent fiscal institutions database"

      55 OECD, "OECD health statistics 2019" Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2019

      56 Bäck, H., "Multiparty government and economic policy-making: Coalition agreements, prime ministerial power and spending in western European cabinets" 170 (170): 33-62, 2017

      57 Kooiman, J., "Modern governance: New government-society interactions" Sage Publications 1-8, 1993

      58 Charnes, A., "Measuring efficiency of decision making units" 1 : 429-444, 1978

      59 Rayp, G., "Measuring and explaining government efficiency in developing countries" 43 (43): 360-381, 2007

      60 Sørenson, E., "Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance" 87 (87): 234-258, 2009

      61 Frees, E. W., "Longitudinal and panel data: Analysis and applications in the social sciences" Cambridge University Press 2004

      62 Beetsma, R., "Independent fiscal councils: Recent trends and performance" International Monetary Fund 2018

      63 IMF, "IMF fiscal councils database" International Monetary Fund 2017

      64 Hagemann, R., "How can fiscal councils strengthen fiscal performance?" 2011 : 79-98, 2011

      65 Kaufmann, D., "Governance matters: From measurement to action" 37 : 10-13, 2000

      66 Kaufmann, D., "Governance matters Ⅷ: Governance indicators for 1996 to 2008" World Bank 2010

      67 Kaufmann, D., "Governance matters Ⅴ: Aggregate and individual governance indicators for 1996 to 2000" World Bank 2006

      68 Kaufmann, D., "Governance matters" World Bank 1999

      69 Peters, G., "Governance in the twenty-first century: Revitalizing public service" McGill-Queen’s University Press 29-57, 2000

      70 IMF, "Fiscal rules dataset 1985-2016"

      71 IMF, "Fiscal policy rules" International Monetary Fund 1998

      72 Kopits, G., "Fiscal policy rules" International Monetary Fund 1998

      73 Hallerberg, M., "Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance" University of Chicago Press 265-300, 1999

      74 Hallerberg, M., "Fiscal governance in Europe" Cambridge University Press 2009

      75 Adam, A., "Fiscal decentralization and public sector efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries" 15 (15): 17-49, 2014

      76 Besley, T., "Fiscal constraints and voter welfare" 91 (91): 755-773, 2007

      77 Kickert, W., "Europe managing the crisis: The politics of fiscal consolidation" Routledge 2015

      78 Cheng, G., "Estimating the technical efficiency of health care systems: A cross-country comparison using the directional distance function" 238 : 899-910, 2014

      79 Porcelli, F., "Electoral accountability and local government efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from the Italian health care sector reforms" 15 : 221-251, 2014

      80 Hsu, Y.-C., "Efficiency in government health spending: A super slacks-based model" 48 : 111-126, 2014

      81 Myerson, R. B., "Effectiveness of electoral systems for reducing government corruption: A game-theoretic analysis" 5 (5): 118-132, 1993

      82 Angelopoulos, K., "Does public sector efficiency matter? Revisiting the relation between fiscal size and economic growth in a world sample" 137 : 245-278, 2008

      83 Méon, P.-G., "Does corruption greese or sand the wheels of growth?" 122 (122): 69-97, 2010

      84 Méon, P.-G., "Does better governance foster efficiency? An aggregate frontier analysis" 6 (6): 75-90, 2005

      85 Fonchamnyo, D. C., "Determinants of public spending efficiency in education and health: evidence from selected CEMAC countries" 40 (40): 199-210, 2016

      86 Busemeyer, M., "Determinants of public education spending in 21 OECD countries, 1980-2001" 14 (14): 582-610, 1980

      87 Lionel, D. T., "Determinants of health spending efficiency: A Tobit panel data approach based on DEA efficiency scores" 11 (11): 56-69, 2015

      88 Hauner, D., "Determinants of government efficiency" 38 (38): 1527-1542, 2010

      89 Maltritz, D., "Determinants of budget deficits in Europe: The role and relations of fiscal rules, fiscal councils, creative accounting and the Euro" 438 : 222-236, 2015

      90 Stein, E., "Democracy, decentralisation and deficits in Latin America" Inter-Development Bank/OECD 95-119, 1998

      91 Hindriks, J., "Decentralization and electoral accountability: Incentives, separation, and voter welfare" 25 (25): 385-397, 2009

      92 Salman, P., "Decentralisation as an incentive scheme" 3 (3): 24-43, 1987

      93 Pierre, J., "Debating governance" Oxford University Press 2000

      94 Cooper, W. W., "Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software" Springer 2007

      95 Persson, T., "Constitutions and economic policy" 18 (18): 75-98, 2004

      96 Driscoll, J. C., "Consistent covariance estimation with spatially dependent panel data" 80 : 549-560, 1998

      97 Ansell, C., "Collaborative governance in theory and practice" 18 (18): 543-571, 2007

      98 Bardhan, P., "Capture and governance at local and national levels" 90 (90): 135-139, 2000

      99 Beetham, D., "Bureaucracy" Open University Press 1996

      100 Frees, E. W., "Assessing cross-sectional correlations in panel data" 69 (69): 393-414, 1995

      101 Padovano, F., "Are the responsibility and yardstick competition hypotheses mutually consistent?" 34 : 459-477, 2014

      102 Gerring, J., "Are parliamentary system better?" 42 (42): 327-359, 2009

      103 Coelli, T. J., "An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis" Springer 2005

      104 Emerson, K., "An integrative framework for collaborative governance: Propositions from the literature" 22 (22): 1-30, 2012

      105 Pastor, J. T., "A global Malmquist productivity index" 88 (88): 266-271, 2005

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.82 1.82 1.97
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.98 2.13 2.164 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼