RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      초등환경교육 현장의 쟁점적 질문: 전문가집단토론(FGD)의 결과와 함의 = Critical Questions from the Field of Elementary Environmental Education: Results and Implications from Focus Group Discussion (FGD)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110128000

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims to identify and systematize the critical issues that elementary teachers encounter in the everyday practice of environmental education in Korea. Using focus group discussions (FGDs), This study elicited teachers’ issue-based questions through interactive dialogue. This backward-mapping approach prioritizes field-based research, positioning teachers—understood as reflective practitioners and mediating professionals—at the center of making latent educational problems visible. The findings are as follows. First, the issues raised in Korean elementary environmental education were organized into seven categories: (1) the meaning and goals of elementary environmental education; (2) content; (3) teaching and learning methods (and assessment); (4) environmental learners; (5) environmental teachers; (6) teaching materials; and (7) activation and support. Second, the issues were concentrated in categories related to the internal consolidation of practice, whereas relatively few were associated with the institutionalization and systematization of the subject. Third, throughout the discussions, participating teachers repeatedly confronted fundamental questions about the identity and future direction of elementary environmental education, resonating with recent efforts to articulate what is distinctive about the field (“elementary environmental education-ness”). Fourth, the issues observed in the field have evolved over time through the complex interplay of multiple factors; thus, meaningful improvement requires first mapping the overall landscape and systematically articulating the issues, ensuring an understanding of their underlying contexts. We expect that the framework developed in this study will provide a foundation for further advancing elementary environmental education.
      번역하기

      This study aims to identify and systematize the critical issues that elementary teachers encounter in the everyday practice of environmental education in Korea. Using focus group discussions (FGDs), This study elicited teachers’ issue-based question...

      This study aims to identify and systematize the critical issues that elementary teachers encounter in the everyday practice of environmental education in Korea. Using focus group discussions (FGDs), This study elicited teachers’ issue-based questions through interactive dialogue. This backward-mapping approach prioritizes field-based research, positioning teachers—understood as reflective practitioners and mediating professionals—at the center of making latent educational problems visible. The findings are as follows. First, the issues raised in Korean elementary environmental education were organized into seven categories: (1) the meaning and goals of elementary environmental education; (2) content; (3) teaching and learning methods (and assessment); (4) environmental learners; (5) environmental teachers; (6) teaching materials; and (7) activation and support. Second, the issues were concentrated in categories related to the internal consolidation of practice, whereas relatively few were associated with the institutionalization and systematization of the subject. Third, throughout the discussions, participating teachers repeatedly confronted fundamental questions about the identity and future direction of elementary environmental education, resonating with recent efforts to articulate what is distinctive about the field (“elementary environmental education-ness”). Fourth, the issues observed in the field have evolved over time through the complex interplay of multiple factors; thus, meaningful improvement requires first mapping the overall landscape and systematically articulating the issues, ensuring an understanding of their underlying contexts. We expect that the framework developed in this study will provide a foundation for further advancing elementary environmental education.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼