RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    디지털치료기기의 경제성 평가: 스코핑리뷰 = Economic Evaluation of Digital Therapeutics: a Scoping Review

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110065031

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    BACKGROUNDS Digital therapeutics (DTx) are software medical devices that deliver evidence-based interventions to prevent, manage, or treat disease. Their clinical value is recognised, yet economic evidence remains limited and diverse. This study aims to map and appraise the reporting quality of economic evaluations of prescription DTx and identify research gaps.
    METHODS A scoping review was conducted using Tornvall’s five-stage framework. PubMed/Medline was searched for articles published up to 6 March 2025 by using “digital therap*” or “DTx” combined with economic terms (“economic ev*”, “cost*”, “saving*”). After deduplication, 237 records were screened; 16 studies reporting cost outcomes for DTx interventions were included. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics and assessed reporting quality with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 checklist.
    RESULTS The 16 included studies originated from the United States (81.3 %), Germany (12.5 %), and South Korea(6.2 %). ReSET-O for substance-use disorder was the most frequently evaluated product. DTx interventions usually involved smartphone or tablet applications delivering cognitive-behavioural therapy. Cost-utility analyses and cost analyses predominated; outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness rations (ICERs), and total savings. Overall, DTx were generally cost-saving or cost-effective, yet development and maintenance costs were rarely disclosed. All of the included studies were of high or moderate reporting quality, but heterogeneity in cost categories, perspectives, and time horizons limited comparability.
    CONCLUSION Evidence suggests prescription DTx can deliver economic as well as clinical value, but standardized evaluations are needed. Future work should explicitly report all cost components and adopt consistent methodological standards to support reimbursement decisions and sustainable integration of DTx into health systems.
    번역하기

    BACKGROUNDS Digital therapeutics (DTx) are software medical devices that deliver evidence-based interventions to prevent, manage, or treat disease. Their clinical value is recognised, yet economic evidence remains limited and diverse. This study aims ...

    BACKGROUNDS Digital therapeutics (DTx) are software medical devices that deliver evidence-based interventions to prevent, manage, or treat disease. Their clinical value is recognised, yet economic evidence remains limited and diverse. This study aims to map and appraise the reporting quality of economic evaluations of prescription DTx and identify research gaps.
    METHODS A scoping review was conducted using Tornvall’s five-stage framework. PubMed/Medline was searched for articles published up to 6 March 2025 by using “digital therap*” or “DTx” combined with economic terms (“economic ev*”, “cost*”, “saving*”). After deduplication, 237 records were screened; 16 studies reporting cost outcomes for DTx interventions were included. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics and assessed reporting quality with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 checklist.
    RESULTS The 16 included studies originated from the United States (81.3 %), Germany (12.5 %), and South Korea(6.2 %). ReSET-O for substance-use disorder was the most frequently evaluated product. DTx interventions usually involved smartphone or tablet applications delivering cognitive-behavioural therapy. Cost-utility analyses and cost analyses predominated; outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness rations (ICERs), and total savings. Overall, DTx were generally cost-saving or cost-effective, yet development and maintenance costs were rarely disclosed. All of the included studies were of high or moderate reporting quality, but heterogeneity in cost categories, perspectives, and time horizons limited comparability.
    CONCLUSION Evidence suggests prescription DTx can deliver economic as well as clinical value, but standardized evaluations are needed. Future work should explicitly report all cost components and adopt consistent methodological standards to support reimbursement decisions and sustainable integration of DTx into health systems.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼