RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Optimization-Based Buyer-Supplier Price Negotiation: Supporting Buyer’s Scenarios with Suppler Selection

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103609419

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose – The paper aims to propose an optimization model for supporting the buyer-seller negotiations. We consider the price, quality, and delivery as evaluation criteria, also recognized as objectives for negotiation. Research design, data, and me...

      Purpose – The paper aims to propose an optimization model for supporting the buyer-seller negotiations. We consider the price, quality, and delivery as evaluation criteria, also recognized as objectives for negotiation.
      Research design, data, and methodology – The methodology used in this paper involves the input-oriented DEA with the inverse optimization. Under the existence of several potential suppliers, the price would be considered to be the decision variable to conclude the negotiation so as to meet the desired level of the quality and delivery. The data set for six suppliers with three criteria is examined by the proposed approach.
      Results – We present the decision aid model by displaying the price spectrum as the changes of desired output levels. It overcomes the shortcomings from previous researches mainly based on the discrete types of scenario generations. This approach shows that the obtained results help the buyer understand the trade-offs between price and performance when he/she considers the negotiation.
      Conclusions – The paper contributes to the numerical models for buyer-supplier negotiation in that the model for the supplier evaluation and selection is closely linked with the model for negotiation. In addition, it eliminates the unrealistic negotiation strategy, and provides the negotiation strategies that the buyer would not shift the burden on suppliers by maintaining the current efficiency.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Weber, C. A., "Vendor selection criteria and methods" 50 (50): 2-18, 1991

      2 Talluri, S., "Vendor performance with supply risk : a chance constrained DEA approach" 100 (100): 212-222, 2006

      3 Liu, J., "Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement" 5 (5): 143-150, 2000

      4 Falagario, M., "Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders" 218 (218): 523-529, 2012

      5 Saen, R. F., "Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data" 183 (183): 741-747, 2007

      6 Saen, R. F., "Supplier selection by the new AR-IDEA model" 39 (39): 1061-1070, 2008

      7 Aksoy, A., "Supplier selection and performance evaluation in just-in-time production environments" 38 : 6351-6359, 2011

      8 Rosato, A., "Sequential negotiations with loss-averse buyers" 91 : 290-304, 2017

      9 Dobler, D. W., "Purchasing and supply management: text and cases" McGraw-Hill 1996

      10 Dobler, D. W., "Purchasing and materials management: Text and cases" McGraw-Hill 1984

      1 Weber, C. A., "Vendor selection criteria and methods" 50 (50): 2-18, 1991

      2 Talluri, S., "Vendor performance with supply risk : a chance constrained DEA approach" 100 (100): 212-222, 2006

      3 Liu, J., "Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement" 5 (5): 143-150, 2000

      4 Falagario, M., "Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders" 218 (218): 523-529, 2012

      5 Saen, R. F., "Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data" 183 (183): 741-747, 2007

      6 Saen, R. F., "Supplier selection by the new AR-IDEA model" 39 (39): 1061-1070, 2008

      7 Aksoy, A., "Supplier selection and performance evaluation in just-in-time production environments" 38 : 6351-6359, 2011

      8 Rosato, A., "Sequential negotiations with loss-averse buyers" 91 : 290-304, 2017

      9 Dobler, D. W., "Purchasing and supply management: text and cases" McGraw-Hill 1996

      10 Dobler, D. W., "Purchasing and materials management: Text and cases" McGraw-Hill 1984

      11 Browning, J. M., "Purchasing and Materials Management : Text and Cases" 26 (26): 42-44, 1990

      12 Zheng, S., "Price negotiation between supplier and buyer under uncertainty with fixed demand and elastic demand" 167 : 35-44, 2015

      13 Talluri, S., "Optimization models for buyer-supplier negotiations" 38 (38): 551-561, 2008

      14 Weber, C. A., "Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection" 108 (108): 208-223, 1998

      15 Golmohammadi, D., "Neural network application for fuzzy multi-criteria decision making problems" 131 : 490-504, 2011

      16 Ho, W., "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection : A literature review" 202 (202): 16-24, 2010

      17 Lim, D. J., "Inverse DEA with frontier changes for new product target setting" 254 (254): 510-516, 2016

      18 Jahanshahloo, G. R., "Inverse DEA under inter-temporal dependence using multiple-objective programming" 240 (240): 447-456, 2015

      19 Cooper, W. W., "Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references" Springer Science & Business Media 2006

      20 Weber, C. A., "Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation : a negotiation tool for buyers" 90 (90): 142-155, 1996

      21 Govindan, K., "Contract analysis : A performance measures and profit evaluation within two-echelon supply chains" 63 (63): 58-74, 2012

      22 Chai, J., "Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection : A systematic review of literature" 40 (40): 3872-3885, 2013

      23 Weber, C. A., "An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ" 5 (5): 90-98, 2000

      24 Wei, Q., "An inverse DEA model for inputs/outputs estimate" 121 (121): 151-163, 2000

      25 Amin, S. H., "An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection : Multi-objective approach" 39 (39): 6782-6791, 2012

      26 Degraeve, Z., "An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective" 125 (125): 34-58, 2000

      27 Pan, A., "An agent-based negotiation model on price and delivery date in a fashion supply chain" 242 (242): 529-557, 2016

      28 Amid, A., "A weighted additive fuzzy multiobjective model for the supplier selection problem under price breaks in a supply chain" 121 (121): 323-332, 2009

      29 De Boer, L., "A review of methods supporting supplier selection" 7 (7): 75-89, 2001

      30 Bragli, M., "A quality assuranceoriented methodology for handling trade-offs in supplier selection" 30 (30): 96-111, 2000

      31 Zhang, X. S., "A project evaluation system in the state economic information system of china an operations research practice in public sectors" 6 (6): 441-452, 1999

      32 Jadidi, O. M. I. D., "A new normalized goal programming model for multi-objective problems : A case of supplier selection and order allocation" 148 : 158-165, 2014

      33 Talluri, S., "A model for performance monitoring of suppliers" 40 (40): 4257-4269, 2002

      34 Li, G. D., "A greybased rough decision-making approach to supplier selection" 36 : 1032-1040, 2008

      35 Weber, C. A., "A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance" 1 (1): 28-39, 1996

      36 Zhu, J., "A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids : extensions and new models" 154 (154): 150-156, 2004

      37 Talluri, S., "A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids" 143 (143): 171-180, 2002

      38 Hadi-Vencheh, A., "A DEA model for resource allocation" 25 (25): 983-993, 2008

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-24 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Academy Of Distribution Science -> Korea Distribution Science Association
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.72 0.72 0.69
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.7 0.72 0.762 0.31
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼