RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      한국-중국-일본 의사 양성과정 비교 연구 = A Comparative Study on Medical Education Systems in Korea, China and Japan

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104018450

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually possess them.
      Methods: A list of characteristics of a good doctor was generated from literature review and from opinions from medical education experts, a focus group of medical students and a pilot survey of patients. An inventory comprising 33 statements was administered to 598 medical students, 145 faculty, 164 primary care physicians and 85 patients.
      Results: All participants regarded ‘accurate diagnosis and treatment’ as the most important attribute for being a ‘good doctor’ and ‘keeping up-to-date’ as the second important attribute. Empathy towards patients, continuing professional development(CPD), kind manners towards patients were also regarded as important. There was a discrepancy between perceived importance and competency in the areas of communication skills, health advocacy and social contribution according to the participating groups.
      Conclusion: Excellence in clinical ability was identified as the most important attribute of a ‘good doctor’. Compassion and CPD were also identified as important characteristics. More sophisticated studies are needed to further explore the attributes of a ‘good doctor’ for our society.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually ...

      Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually possess them.
      Methods: A list of characteristics of a good doctor was generated from literature review and from opinions from medical education experts, a focus group of medical students and a pilot survey of patients. An inventory comprising 33 statements was administered to 598 medical students, 145 faculty, 164 primary care physicians and 85 patients.
      Results: All participants regarded ‘accurate diagnosis and treatment’ as the most important attribute for being a ‘good doctor’ and ‘keeping up-to-date’ as the second important attribute. Empathy towards patients, continuing professional development(CPD), kind manners towards patients were also regarded as important. There was a discrepancy between perceived importance and competency in the areas of communication skills, health advocacy and social contribution according to the participating groups.
      Conclusion: Excellence in clinical ability was identified as the most important attribute of a ‘good doctor’. Compassion and CPD were also identified as important characteristics. More sophisticated studies are needed to further explore the attributes of a ‘good doctor’ for our society.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 van Niekerk J.P, "WFME global standards receive ringing endorsemen" 37 : 585-586, 2003

      2 Meng K.H, "The suggestion for development of Korean medical education in 21C" 43 (43): 29-34, 2000

      3 Lee Y.S, "The plan of multiple National examination for medical practitioners" Seoul: National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board 2003

      4 Lee Y.S, "Recent changes in medical education in Japan" 16 (16): 119-137, 2004

      5 Onishi H, "Rapid change in Japanese medical education" 26 (26): 403-408, 2004

      6 Kam S, "Professional education of the physician and medical specialist" 42 (42): 1049-1060, 1999

      7 Kozu T, "New preclinical medical education, 1: Problem-based learning tutorials" Tokyo, Shinohara Shuppan Shinsha 39-43, 2002

      8 Sato T, "Model core curriculum and common achievement test before clinical clerkship in medical education" Tokyo, Shinohara Shuppan Shinsha 80-83, 2002

      9 Ban N, "Medical education reform in Japan: with a particular emphasis on clinical skills" AMEA 2005 Proceedings 20-22, 2005

      10 Schwarz M.R, "Medical education ins China′s leading medical schools" 26 (26): 215-222, 2004

      1 van Niekerk J.P, "WFME global standards receive ringing endorsemen" 37 : 585-586, 2003

      2 Meng K.H, "The suggestion for development of Korean medical education in 21C" 43 (43): 29-34, 2000

      3 Lee Y.S, "The plan of multiple National examination for medical practitioners" Seoul: National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board 2003

      4 Lee Y.S, "Recent changes in medical education in Japan" 16 (16): 119-137, 2004

      5 Onishi H, "Rapid change in Japanese medical education" 26 (26): 403-408, 2004

      6 Kam S, "Professional education of the physician and medical specialist" 42 (42): 1049-1060, 1999

      7 Kozu T, "New preclinical medical education, 1: Problem-based learning tutorials" Tokyo, Shinohara Shuppan Shinsha 39-43, 2002

      8 Sato T, "Model core curriculum and common achievement test before clinical clerkship in medical education" Tokyo, Shinohara Shuppan Shinsha 80-83, 2002

      9 Ban N, "Medical education reform in Japan: with a particular emphasis on clinical skills" AMEA 2005 Proceedings 20-22, 2005

      10 Schwarz M.R, "Medical education ins China′s leading medical schools" 26 (26): 215-222, 2004

      11 Reynolds T, "Medical education in modern China" 291 (291): 2141-, 2004

      12 Gao T, "Medical education in China for 21st century" 33 : 768-773, 1999

      13 Kim J.D, "Major issues on medical services in DDA negotiations and future policy implications" Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy 2003

      14 Ahn, D.S, "Keeping up-to-date register of qualified doctors with good standing" 45 (45): 1098-1104, 2002

      15 Yang, ". Medical education in China. Korean Journal of Medical Education" 77-80, 1991

      16 Deng Yizhong, ". Development of medical education in China. Academic Medicine" 512-514, 1990

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-07-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국의학교육 -> Korean Journal of Medical Education
      외국어명 : korean journal of medical education -> 미등록
      KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.02 1.02 0.76
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.82 0.76 1.204 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼