Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104018450
2007
-
KCI등재,SCOPUS
학술저널
271-278(8쪽)
2
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually ...
Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually possess them.
Methods: A list of characteristics of a good doctor was generated from literature review and from opinions from medical education experts, a focus group of medical students and a pilot survey of patients. An inventory comprising 33 statements was administered to 598 medical students, 145 faculty, 164 primary care physicians and 85 patients.
Results: All participants regarded ‘accurate diagnosis and treatment’ as the most important attribute for being a ‘good doctor’ and ‘keeping up-to-date’ as the second important attribute. Empathy towards patients, continuing professional development(CPD), kind manners towards patients were also regarded as important. There was a discrepancy between perceived importance and competency in the areas of communication skills, health advocacy and social contribution according to the participating groups.
Conclusion: Excellence in clinical ability was identified as the most important attribute of a ‘good doctor’. Compassion and CPD were also identified as important characteristics. More sophisticated studies are needed to further explore the attributes of a ‘good doctor’ for our society.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 van Niekerk J.P, "WFME global standards receive ringing endorsemen" 37 : 585-586, 2003
2 Meng K.H, "The suggestion for development of Korean medical education in 21C" 43 (43): 29-34, 2000
3 Lee Y.S, "The plan of multiple National examination for medical practitioners" Seoul: National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board 2003
4 Lee Y.S, "Recent changes in medical education in Japan" 16 (16): 119-137, 2004
5 Onishi H, "Rapid change in Japanese medical education" 26 (26): 403-408, 2004
6 Kam S, "Professional education of the physician and medical specialist" 42 (42): 1049-1060, 1999
7 Kozu T, "New preclinical medical education, 1: Problem-based learning tutorials" Tokyo, Shinohara Shuppan Shinsha 39-43, 2002
8 Sato T, "Model core curriculum and common achievement test before clinical clerkship in medical education" Tokyo, Shinohara Shuppan Shinsha 80-83, 2002
9 Ban N, "Medical education reform in Japan: with a particular emphasis on clinical skills" AMEA 2005 Proceedings 20-22, 2005
10 Schwarz M.R, "Medical education ins China′s leading medical schools" 26 (26): 215-222, 2004
1 van Niekerk J.P, "WFME global standards receive ringing endorsemen" 37 : 585-586, 2003
2 Meng K.H, "The suggestion for development of Korean medical education in 21C" 43 (43): 29-34, 2000
3 Lee Y.S, "The plan of multiple National examination for medical practitioners" Seoul: National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board 2003
4 Lee Y.S, "Recent changes in medical education in Japan" 16 (16): 119-137, 2004
5 Onishi H, "Rapid change in Japanese medical education" 26 (26): 403-408, 2004
6 Kam S, "Professional education of the physician and medical specialist" 42 (42): 1049-1060, 1999
7 Kozu T, "New preclinical medical education, 1: Problem-based learning tutorials" Tokyo, Shinohara Shuppan Shinsha 39-43, 2002
8 Sato T, "Model core curriculum and common achievement test before clinical clerkship in medical education" Tokyo, Shinohara Shuppan Shinsha 80-83, 2002
9 Ban N, "Medical education reform in Japan: with a particular emphasis on clinical skills" AMEA 2005 Proceedings 20-22, 2005
10 Schwarz M.R, "Medical education ins China′s leading medical schools" 26 (26): 215-222, 2004
11 Reynolds T, "Medical education in modern China" 291 (291): 2141-, 2004
12 Gao T, "Medical education in China for 21st century" 33 : 768-773, 1999
13 Kim J.D, "Major issues on medical services in DDA negotiations and future policy implications" Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy 2003
14 Ahn, D.S, "Keeping up-to-date register of qualified doctors with good standing" 45 (45): 1098-1104, 2002
15 Yang, ". Medical education in China. Korean Journal of Medical Education" 77-80, 1991
16 Deng Yizhong, ". Development of medical education in China. Academic Medicine" 512-514, 1990
건강-보건-의료 관련 전공자를 위한 기초의학 통합강의의 적용
의생명과학 체험프로그램 개발을 위한 생명과학 교과 교육환경 분석
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 평가예정 | 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지) | |
| 2017-01-01 | 평가 | 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
| 2013-07-22 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 한국의학교육 -> Korean Journal of Medical Education외국어명 : korean journal of medical education -> 미등록 | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.82 | 0.76 | 1.204 | 0.08 |