RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Effect of Total-Identification on the Performance of Computer-Mediated Group Idea Generation = 아이디어 실명제가 컴퓨터 기반 그룹의 퍼포먼스에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99765031

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Results of more than three decades of research have provided evidence that computer-based idea generation is more than a management fashion. However, given that the performance of computer-based groups when compared to that of (paper-and-penciled-based) nominal groups did not yield substantial productivity differences regardless of group sizes and other factors, computer-based idea generation appears to be another management fad. One reason for such productivity paradox stems from the absence of clear task performance information because all contributions are generically anonymous, inducing social loafing and downward productivity matching – a tendency of productivity matching to a perceived baseline. Prior studies introduced a real-time performance feedback mechanism as an external intervention to combat process losses due to anonymity of comments. Despite a significant performance improvement, we observed a consistent limitation that is the tendency of performance competitiveness from quality to quantity toward later stages of the idea generation session. In this study, we introduced a situational factor, i.e., individuals’ real names as an additional external intervention variable to increase the degree of identifiability and evaluability of individual outputs, while maintaining the same quantity feedback. The results showed that (1) expected statistical significances were yielded for both quantity and quality of ideas and (2) performance competitiveness did not diminish throughout the idea generation session in the total-Identification condition. However, given that the magnitude of the effect of total-identification when compared to the effect of pseudonymity on ideation performance doesn’t seem large enough, a pursuit of further research to identify factors that could reinforce the effect of total-identification is necessary. The results also showed that individuals’ real names in conjunction with performance feedback did not have an effect on reducing the number of junk comments. The notions of face-saving and comments filtering are suggested to fine-tune the interface of computer-based idea generation.
      번역하기

      Results of more than three decades of research have provided evidence that computer-based idea generation is more than a management fashion. However, given that the performance of computer-based groups when compared to that of (paper-and-penciled-base...

      Results of more than three decades of research have provided evidence that computer-based idea generation is more than a management fashion. However, given that the performance of computer-based groups when compared to that of (paper-and-penciled-based) nominal groups did not yield substantial productivity differences regardless of group sizes and other factors, computer-based idea generation appears to be another management fad. One reason for such productivity paradox stems from the absence of clear task performance information because all contributions are generically anonymous, inducing social loafing and downward productivity matching – a tendency of productivity matching to a perceived baseline. Prior studies introduced a real-time performance feedback mechanism as an external intervention to combat process losses due to anonymity of comments. Despite a significant performance improvement, we observed a consistent limitation that is the tendency of performance competitiveness from quality to quantity toward later stages of the idea generation session. In this study, we introduced a situational factor, i.e., individuals’ real names as an additional external intervention variable to increase the degree of identifiability and evaluability of individual outputs, while maintaining the same quantity feedback. The results showed that (1) expected statistical significances were yielded for both quantity and quality of ideas and (2) performance competitiveness did not diminish throughout the idea generation session in the total-Identification condition. However, given that the magnitude of the effect of total-identification when compared to the effect of pseudonymity on ideation performance doesn’t seem large enough, a pursuit of further research to identify factors that could reinforce the effect of total-identification is necessary. The results also showed that individuals’ real names in conjunction with performance feedback did not have an effect on reducing the number of junk comments. The notions of face-saving and comments filtering are suggested to fine-tune the interface of computer-based idea generation.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      컴퓨터 기반 브레인스토밍에 전통적으로 적용된 아이디어 익명제는 생산성 향상을 위한 새로운 방법을 모색하는 연구가들에 의해 문제점으로 지적되어 왔다. 익명성이 유도하는 프로세스 손실 (social loafing, downward productivity matching 등)을 극복하기 위해 시도된 실시간 생산성 피드백기능 조차 시간이 경과함에 따라 생산성이 질에서 양으로 변질되는 경향을 보여왔다. 본 연구는 이러한 관찰된 단점을 극복하기 위해 실시간 생산성 피드백기능에 실명제를 추가하여 통제 효과를 실험하였다. 익명제에 비해 월등한 생산성향상은 유도되지 않았지만 실명제의 효과는 양과 질에서 분명한 차이를 보였다. 따라서 앞으로의 연구에서는 실명제를 보완할 새로운 요소를 찾아내는 기법에 대한 고찰이 필요하다고 보여진다.
      번역하기

      컴퓨터 기반 브레인스토밍에 전통적으로 적용된 아이디어 익명제는 생산성 향상을 위한 새로운 방법을 모색하는 연구가들에 의해 문제점으로 지적되어 왔다. 익명성이 유도하는 프로세스 ...

      컴퓨터 기반 브레인스토밍에 전통적으로 적용된 아이디어 익명제는 생산성 향상을 위한 새로운 방법을 모색하는 연구가들에 의해 문제점으로 지적되어 왔다. 익명성이 유도하는 프로세스 손실 (social loafing, downward productivity matching 등)을 극복하기 위해 시도된 실시간 생산성 피드백기능 조차 시간이 경과함에 따라 생산성이 질에서 양으로 변질되는 경향을 보여왔다. 본 연구는 이러한 관찰된 단점을 극복하기 위해 실시간 생산성 피드백기능에 실명제를 추가하여 통제 효과를 실험하였다. 익명제에 비해 월등한 생산성향상은 유도되지 않았지만 실명제의 효과는 양과 질에서 분명한 차이를 보였다. 따라서 앞으로의 연구에서는 실명제를 보완할 새로운 요소를 찾아내는 기법에 대한 고찰이 필요하다고 보여진다.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Theoretical Framework
      • Ⅲ. Methods
      • Ⅳ. Results
      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Theoretical Framework
      • Ⅲ. Methods
      • Ⅳ. Results
      • Ⅴ. Discussion
      • Ⅵ. Conclusion
      • References
      • <요 약>
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Wikipedia"

      2 Jessup, L. M., "Theoretical and methodological issues in group support systems research: Learning from groups gone awry" 28 : 394-413, 1997

      3 Mouton, J. S., "The Relationship Between Frequency Of Yielding And The Disclosure Of Personal Identity" 24 : 339-347, 1956

      4 Jung, J. H., "The Influence of Real-Time Identifiability and Evaluability Performance Feedback on Group Electronic Brainstorming Performance" 2005

      5 Strobe, W., "The Illusion of Group Effectivity" 18 : 643-650, 1992

      6 Pinsonneault, A., "The Illusion of Electronic Brainstorming Productivity: Theoretical and Empirical Issues" 10 : 378-380, 1999

      7 Jung, J. H., "The Effects of Real-Time Individual Performance Feedback and Goal Setting on Computer-Mediated Group Idea Generation" 2005

      8 정종호, "The Effects of Objective Self-Awareness and Ostracism on Reducing Junk Comments in Computer-Based Idea Generation" 한국산업경영학회 25 (25): 313-336, 2010

      9 정종호, "The Effects of Frivolous Comments on the Performance of Computer-Mediated Group Idea Generation" 한국산업경영학회 27 (27): 195-217, 2012

      10 Jessup, L. M., "The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task" 14 : 313-321, 1990

      1 "Wikipedia"

      2 Jessup, L. M., "Theoretical and methodological issues in group support systems research: Learning from groups gone awry" 28 : 394-413, 1997

      3 Mouton, J. S., "The Relationship Between Frequency Of Yielding And The Disclosure Of Personal Identity" 24 : 339-347, 1956

      4 Jung, J. H., "The Influence of Real-Time Identifiability and Evaluability Performance Feedback on Group Electronic Brainstorming Performance" 2005

      5 Strobe, W., "The Illusion of Group Effectivity" 18 : 643-650, 1992

      6 Pinsonneault, A., "The Illusion of Electronic Brainstorming Productivity: Theoretical and Empirical Issues" 10 : 378-380, 1999

      7 Jung, J. H., "The Effects of Real-Time Individual Performance Feedback and Goal Setting on Computer-Mediated Group Idea Generation" 2005

      8 정종호, "The Effects of Objective Self-Awareness and Ostracism on Reducing Junk Comments in Computer-Based Idea Generation" 한국산업경영학회 25 (25): 313-336, 2010

      9 정종호, "The Effects of Frivolous Comments on the Performance of Computer-Mediated Group Idea Generation" 한국산업경영학회 27 (27): 195-217, 2012

      10 Jessup, L. M., "The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task" 14 : 313-321, 1990

      11 Ting-Toomey, S., "The Challenge of Facework: Cross-cultural and Interpersonal Issues" State University of New York Press 1994

      12 Hiltz, S. R., "Structuring Computer-Mediated Communication Systems to Avoid Information Overload" 28 : 59-85, 1985

      13 Michener, H. A., "Social Psychology" Harcourt Brace College Publisher 1999

      14 Szymanski, K., "Social Loafing and Self-evaluation with a Social Standard" 53 : 891-897, 1987

      15 Paulus, P. B., "Social Influence Processes In Group Brainstorming" 64 : 575-586, 1993

      16 Paulus, P. B., "Social Influence Process in Computer Brainstorming" 18 : 3-14, 1996

      17 Barki, H., "Small Group Brainstorming And Idea Quality: Is Electronic Brainstorming The Most Effective Approach?" 32 : 158-205, 2001

      18 Bouchard, T. J., "Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups" 54 : 51-55, 1970

      19 Sedikides, C., "Self-evaluation: To Thine Own Self To Be Good, To Thine Own Self Be Sure, To Thine Own Self Be True, And To Thine Own Self Be Better, In Advances In Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 29)" Academic Press 209-269, 1997

      20 Wayment, H. A., "Self-evaluation Processes: Motives, Information Use, and Self-esteem" 63 : 729-757, 1995

      21 Mullen, B., "Self-Attention Theory, In Theories Of Group Behavior" Springer-Verlag 125-146, 1987

      22 Gecas, V., "Self and Identity, In Sociological perspectives on social psychology" Allyn and Bacon 41-67, 1995

      23 Albanese, R., "Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free Riding Tendency" 10 : 244-255, 1985

      24 Diehl, M., "Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle" 53 : 497-509, 1987

      25 Scheier, M. R., "Private and Public Self-attention, Resistance to Change, and Dissonance Reduction" 39 : 390-405, 1980

      26 Hull, C. L., "Principles of behavior" Appleton-Century-Crofts 1943

      27 Porter, L. W., "Managerial Attitudes and Performance" RD Irwin 1968

      28 Eisenberger, R., "Learned Industriousness" 99 : 248-267, 1992

      29 Cheek, J. M., "Identity Orientations and Self-interpretation, In Personality psychology: ReCent Trends And Emerging Directions" Springer 275-285, 1989

      30 VanGundy, A. B., "Idea Power: Techniques and Resources to Unleash the Creativity in Your Organization" AMACOM 1992

      31 "GroupSystems"

      32 Steiner, I. D., "Group Process and Productivity" Academic Press 1972

      33 Parks, C. D., "Group Performance and Interaction" Westview Press 1999

      34 Austin, J. T., "Goal-Setting Theory: Unexplored Areas And Future Research Needs" 58 : 289-308, 1985

      35 Weldon, E., "Felt Dispensability in Groups of Coactors: The Effects of Shared Responsibility and Explicit Anonymity on Cognitive Effort" 41 : 330-351, 1988

      36 Ashford, S. J., "Feedback As An Individual Resource: Personal Strategies Of Creating Information" 32 : 370-398, 1983

      37 Brown, B. R., "Face-Saving Following Experimentally Induced Embarrassment" 6 : 255-271, 1970

      38 Paulus, P. B., "Enhancing Ideational Creativity in Groups: Lesson From Research on Brainstorming, In Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration" Oxford University Press 110-136, 2003

      39 Nunamaker, J. F., "Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work" 34 : 40-61, 1991

      40 Gallupe, R. B., "Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size" 35 : 350-369, 1992

      41 Connolly, T., "Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups" 36 : 689-703, 1990

      42 Diener, E., "Deindividuation: The Absence Of Self-Awareness And Self-Regulation In Group Members, In Psychology of Group Influence" Erlbaum 209-242, 1980

      43 Wills, T. A., "Commentary: Neo-social Comparison and Beyond, In Social Comparison: Contemporary Theory and Research" Erlbaum 395-411, 1991

      44 Baumeister, R. F., "Bad is Stronger Than Good" 5 : 323-370, 2001

      45 Zajonc, R. B., "Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure" 9 : 1-29, 1968

      46 Osborn, A. F., "Applied imagination" Scribner 1957

      47 Pinsonneault, A., "Anonymity in Group Support Systems Research: A New Conceptualization, Measure, and Contingency Framework" 14 : 89-108, 1998

      48 Carver, C. S., "ATtention And Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach To Human Behavior" Springer-Verlag 1981

      49 Duval, T. S., "A Theory of Objective Self-awareness" Academic 1972

      50 Brown, B., "A Simple Dynamic Model Of Social Factors In Group Brainstorming" 27 : 91-114, 1996

      51 Luhtanen, R., "A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation Of One’S Social Identity" 18 : 302-318, 1992

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.6 0.6 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.75 0.75 1 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼