RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      CO2 Emissions and Their Abatement Measures in the Transportation Sector of Korea = CO2 Emissions and Their Abatement Measures in the Transportation Sector of Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102027068

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As concerns on global warming by the greenhouse effect escalate, national efforts to respond to climate changes are growing in Korea. This study was, by an integrated simulation framework, to address the emission of CO2 , which is the most contributing greenhouse gas to global warming, and assess the policy options to abate CO2 emissions in the transportation sector of Korea. The applied model of this study was AIM(Asia-Pacific Integrated Model for Evaluating Policy Options to Reduce GHG Emission and Global Warming Impacts) originally developed by the National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan. Based on AIM, the conditions of new energy-saving technologies selection was assessed under the various scenarios regarding different rates of carbon taxes, subsidies and the existence of a driving restriction system. There are 3 major findings of the study. First, the carbon tax may not play any tole in promoting the market entry of energy-saving or low CO2 emitting vehicles in the future since the cost savings made by new low CO2 emitting vehicles alone are large enough to allow themselves to enter into the market. Second, while the energy consumption in the transportation sector is expected to grow very rapidly and high, the appropriate policy measures to curtail CO2 emissions in the transportation sector are very limited under the present technology development pace. Thus, various approaches other than the just imposition of carbon tax such as the nationwide driving restriction system, are required. Third, when the carbon tax may not be effective, subsidies, which are given to the buyers of energy-saving vehicles, could be another option to reduce CO2 emissions in the transportation sector. However, it requires a huge amount of financial sources and moderate rates of carbon taxes can not cover all the necessary funds. Also, subsidies are considered to be incompatible with polluter-pays-principle. Therefore, subsidies to R&D on electric cars, energy-saving vehicles and other CO2 abatement equipments are recommended.
      번역하기

      As concerns on global warming by the greenhouse effect escalate, national efforts to respond to climate changes are growing in Korea. This study was, by an integrated simulation framework, to address the emission of CO2 , which is the most contributin...

      As concerns on global warming by the greenhouse effect escalate, national efforts to respond to climate changes are growing in Korea. This study was, by an integrated simulation framework, to address the emission of CO2 , which is the most contributing greenhouse gas to global warming, and assess the policy options to abate CO2 emissions in the transportation sector of Korea. The applied model of this study was AIM(Asia-Pacific Integrated Model for Evaluating Policy Options to Reduce GHG Emission and Global Warming Impacts) originally developed by the National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan. Based on AIM, the conditions of new energy-saving technologies selection was assessed under the various scenarios regarding different rates of carbon taxes, subsidies and the existence of a driving restriction system. There are 3 major findings of the study. First, the carbon tax may not play any tole in promoting the market entry of energy-saving or low CO2 emitting vehicles in the future since the cost savings made by new low CO2 emitting vehicles alone are large enough to allow themselves to enter into the market. Second, while the energy consumption in the transportation sector is expected to grow very rapidly and high, the appropriate policy measures to curtail CO2 emissions in the transportation sector are very limited under the present technology development pace. Thus, various approaches other than the just imposition of carbon tax such as the nationwide driving restriction system, are required. Third, when the carbon tax may not be effective, subsidies, which are given to the buyers of energy-saving vehicles, could be another option to reduce CO2 emissions in the transportation sector. However, it requires a huge amount of financial sources and moderate rates of carbon taxes can not cover all the necessary funds. Also, subsidies are considered to be incompatible with polluter-pays-principle. Therefore, subsidies to R&D on electric cars, energy-saving vehicles and other CO2 abatement equipments are recommended.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼