RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      대학생들이 따라한 영어 문장의 화자별 운율 특성 분석

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76389691

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      For a natural conversation with English speaking people. listening and speaking skills seem very important. In Korea. many students attempt to improve the skills by repeating English sentences loudly. However, they could not achieve those skills
      easily because their repetition lacks attention. The purpose of this study is to examine the prosodic features of English sentences repeated by eight students divided into high and low groups by their TOEIC scores. Four sentences of various number of words were presented to the students. and they immediately repeated them. Fundamental frequency values of each recorded sentence every five milliseconds were carefully determined to compare them along with those of the native speaker. Results showed that the prosodic features of the students came out almost similar in the short sentences but the gap between the two groups and the native speaker widened as the sentence became longer. Secondly. as the number of words in each sentence became greater. the low group made more errors than the high group. Specifically, many students made errors in the function words which did not have sentence stress. It is desirable to devise some visible guides to diagnose wrong prosodic features of the students on an individual basis.
      번역하기

      For a natural conversation with English speaking people. listening and speaking skills seem very important. In Korea. many students attempt to improve the skills by repeating English sentences loudly. However, they could not achieve those skills easi...

      For a natural conversation with English speaking people. listening and speaking skills seem very important. In Korea. many students attempt to improve the skills by repeating English sentences loudly. However, they could not achieve those skills
      easily because their repetition lacks attention. The purpose of this study is to examine the prosodic features of English sentences repeated by eight students divided into high and low groups by their TOEIC scores. Four sentences of various number of words were presented to the students. and they immediately repeated them. Fundamental frequency values of each recorded sentence every five milliseconds were carefully determined to compare them along with those of the native speaker. Results showed that the prosodic features of the students came out almost similar in the short sentences but the gap between the two groups and the native speaker widened as the sentence became longer. Secondly. as the number of words in each sentence became greater. the low group made more errors than the high group. Specifically, many students made errors in the function words which did not have sentence stress. It is desirable to devise some visible guides to diagnose wrong prosodic features of the students on an individual basis.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. 머릿말
      • 2. 연구방법
      • 3. 분석 결과와 토론
      • 4. 맺음말
      • Abstract
      • 1. 머릿말
      • 2. 연구방법
      • 3. 분석 결과와 토론
      • 4. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "영어모음 발음의 이론과 실제" 7 : 127-137, 1997

      2 "The sounds of speech communication" Pro-ed 1987

      3 "The complete guide to TOEICR" Thomson Learning 1997

      4 "Speech acoustics and perception" Pro-ed 1986

      5 "Signalyze에 의한 피치 분석 방법 고찰" 28 : 69-79, 1998

      6 "Principles of experimental phonetics" Mosby 1996

      7 "Paralinguistic variation and invariance in the characteristic frequencies of vowels" 1-45 29, 1988

      8 "Notes on the phonetics of word prosody. Stress patterns of the world." Holland Academic Graphics. 233-269, 1996

      9 "Information conveyed by vowels Journal of the Acoustical Society of America" 98-104, 1957

      10 "An acoustical study of English word stress produced by Americans and Koreans." 9 (9): 77-88, 2002

      1 "영어모음 발음의 이론과 실제" 7 : 127-137, 1997

      2 "The sounds of speech communication" Pro-ed 1987

      3 "The complete guide to TOEICR" Thomson Learning 1997

      4 "Speech acoustics and perception" Pro-ed 1986

      5 "Signalyze에 의한 피치 분석 방법 고찰" 28 : 69-79, 1998

      6 "Principles of experimental phonetics" Mosby 1996

      7 "Paralinguistic variation and invariance in the characteristic frequencies of vowels" 1-45 29, 1988

      8 "Notes on the phonetics of word prosody. Stress patterns of the world." Holland Academic Graphics. 233-269, 1996

      9 "Information conveyed by vowels Journal of the Acoustical Society of America" 98-104, 1957

      10 "An acoustical study of English word stress produced by Americans and Koreans." 9 (9): 77-88, 2002

      11 "Acoustic theory of speech production" Mouton 1960

      12 "A sketch of the H-H theory" 403-439, 1990

      13 "A comparative study of English and Korean monophthongs produced by male and female speakers." 24 : 245-261, 1996

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.75 0.75 0.77
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.7 0.68 1.275 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼