RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공적개발원조(ODA)의 부문별 중점지원국 선정 방법론

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82756656

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korea’s foreign aid allocation has been criticized to be inefficient due to its provisions to too large numbers of developing countries. Previous studies and international organizations such as DAC equally advise Korean government to concentrate its aid resources on a small number of core recipient countries. The rational determination of core recipient countries requires clear criteria and a precise methodology for the selection. This study aims to suggest a methodology for systemic selection of core recipient countries, taking a agricultural sector as an example. This study is novel in three points: to suggest criteria for aid allocation across countries based on previous studies and international discussions, to illustrate quantitative indicators to reflect the criteria and be possibly applied to other sectors, and to provide a methodology to calculate weights of the indicators.
    번역하기

    Korea’s foreign aid allocation has been criticized to be inefficient due to its provisions to too large numbers of developing countries. Previous studies and international organizations such as DAC equally advise Korean government to concentrate its...

    Korea’s foreign aid allocation has been criticized to be inefficient due to its provisions to too large numbers of developing countries. Previous studies and international organizations such as DAC equally advise Korean government to concentrate its aid resources on a small number of core recipient countries. The rational determination of core recipient countries requires clear criteria and a precise methodology for the selection. This study aims to suggest a methodology for systemic selection of core recipient countries, taking a agricultural sector as an example. This study is novel in three points: to suggest criteria for aid allocation across countries based on previous studies and international discussions, to illustrate quantitative indicators to reflect the criteria and be possibly applied to other sectors, and to provide a methodology to calculate weights of the indicators.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국수출입은행 ODA 통계데이터베이스"

    2 대한민국정부, "국제개발협력 선진화방안" 2010

    3 World Bank, "World Governance indicators"

    4 World Bank, "World Development Indicators 2010"

    5 Alesina, A, "Who gives foreign aid to whom and why" 5 : 33-63, 2000

    6 Demirel-Pegg, T, "US aid allocation: The Nexus of human rights, democracy, and development" 46 (46): 181-198, 2009

    7 McKinlay, R. D., "The U.S. Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and Donor Interest Models" 27 (27): 236-250, 1979

    8 OECD DAC, "Special review of Korea" OECD 2008

    9 OECD DAC, "Paris declaration on aid effectiveness" OECD 2005

    10 Maizels, A, "Motivations for aid to developing countries" 12 (12): 879-900, 1984

    1 "한국수출입은행 ODA 통계데이터베이스"

    2 대한민국정부, "국제개발협력 선진화방안" 2010

    3 World Bank, "World Governance indicators"

    4 World Bank, "World Development Indicators 2010"

    5 Alesina, A, "Who gives foreign aid to whom and why" 5 : 33-63, 2000

    6 Demirel-Pegg, T, "US aid allocation: The Nexus of human rights, democracy, and development" 46 (46): 181-198, 2009

    7 McKinlay, R. D., "The U.S. Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and Donor Interest Models" 27 (27): 236-250, 1979

    8 OECD DAC, "Special review of Korea" OECD 2008

    9 OECD DAC, "Paris declaration on aid effectiveness" OECD 2005

    10 Maizels, A, "Motivations for aid to developing countries" 12 (12): 879-900, 1984

    11 Younas,J, "Motivation for bilateral aid allocation:Altruism or trade benefits" 24 : 661-674, 2008

    12 OECD, "Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User guide" OECD 2008

    13 Gates, S, "Global aid allocation: Are Nordic Donors different" CASE 2004

    14 Claessens, S, "Evidence on changes in aid allocation criteria" 23 (23): 185-208, 2009

    15 IMF, "Direction of Trade"

    16 Macdonald, R, "Determinants of Canadian bilateral aid allocations: humanitarian, commercial or political" 37 (37): 294-312, 2004

    17 OECD DAC, "Creditor Reporting System: Aid Activities in support of Agriculture, 2006-2007" OECD 2009

    18 Schraeder, P. J., "Clarifying the foreign aid puzzle: A comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish aid flows" 50 : 294-323, 1998

    19 Berthelemy. J-C, "Bilateral donors' aid allocation decisions-a three-dimensional panel analysis" 13 : 253-274, 2004

    20 Berthelemy.J-C., "Bilateral donor's interest vs. recipients' development motives in aid allocation: Do all donors behave the same" 10 (10): 179-194, 2006

    21 기획재정부, "2010년 경제발전경험 공유사업 추진계획" 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.8 0.8 0.78
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.79 0.73 1.357 0.19
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼