This study examined countermeasures of the Criminal Law in accordance with appearance of "Risikogesellschaft". The social risk that characterizedmodern society had much value after Ulich Beck, German sociologist, suggested concep...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76465741
2006
-
360
KCI등재
학술저널
513-533(21쪽)
28
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study examined countermeasures of the Criminal Law in accordance with appearance of "Risikogesellschaft". The social risk that characterizedmodern society had much value after Ulich Beck, German sociologist, suggested concep...
This study examined countermeasures of the Criminal Law in accordance with appearance of "Risikogesellschaft". The social risk that characterizedmodern society had much value after Ulich Beck, German sociologist, suggested concept of "Risikogesellschaft". These days, the concept of Risikogesellschaft was generally accepted by not only the areas of sociology and philosophy but also the area of criminology. Great risk still existed from objective point of view and unrest was produced every day from subjective point of view: The concept of Risikogesellschaft required changes at roles and functions of the Criminal Law. The terminologies of "risk" and "risk society" were actively said at the social discourse including media so that the Criminal Law discussed countermeasures.<BR> The discussion was as follows:<BR> Firstly, the paper examined basic idea of risk-society as well as Risikostrafrecht based on risk-society. Active role change of the Criminal Law at risk-society was required to start discussion as follow:<BR> Secondly, the paper examined concrete issues of conflict phenomenon between traditional criminal law and so called Risikostrafrecht. The issue could be classified into committing a crime at precedent stage and symbolic legislation to have a problem of Risikostrafrecht.<BR> Thirdly, alternative proposals to overcome risk society were introduced to examine discussion. The theories of concrete solution of conflict between traditional criminal law and Risikostrafrecht were investigated.<BR> Lastly, a conclusion was suggested. If actions would be taken carelessly at social demand on involvement of criminal law at existing risks, legal system could be destroyed to jeopardize effectiveness of the law itself: Last step of punishment was confirmed again not to give up even at risk society of modern times. Therefore, the Criminal Law should take actions against risk society not to destroy essence of the principles of the Criminal Law of modern times but to regulate at minimum level. And. social members should make efforts to reinforce norm consciousness and to settle ineffectiveness of the laws that might be produced at risk society. The concept of new legal interest of the Criminal Law at traditional law-governed country, abstract risk criminals, administrative dependency and group responsibility, etc should investigate theories carefully to accept them flexibly and to solve future problems.
목차 (Table of Contents)
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2018-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2017-10-24 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 | ![]() |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2008-10-10 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review | ![]() |
2008-05-13 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies | ![]() |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2003-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.71 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.6 | 0.57 | 0.849 | 0.28 |