RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      세계 각국 헌법 전문(前文)의 비교 = Comparison of preambles to constitutions around the world

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108442215

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Preamble to the Constitution refers to a sentence or provision placed before the text of the Constitution, which consists of a part of the Constitutions. Preamble to the Constitution declares the historical origin and the basic principle of constitution, and also declares its constitutional commitment. The purpose of Preamble to the Constitution is to identify the subject and the procedure of Constitutions as well as the motive, purpose and ideology of Constitution showing the identify of Constitutions, but it is not included in the text along with appendix, and is not essential element of written constituions. However, the written constitutions around the world have the preamble. This study targets total 16 countries that have Preamble to the Constitution including our country. What we want to obtain through the comparison of Constitutions is the accurate understanding of practical application of Constitutions, which are the target of comparison, and its ultimate goal is to secure the optimized constitutional normative power by specify the similarity or difference of preamble shown from individual and concrete application of each country. The comparison method of preamble to achieve this goal can be classified into formal aspect and practical aspect. Preamble to the Constitution is positioned in the front of text, so the actual benefit of comparison is not that big. Therefore, the core contents should be identified through practical aspect comparison. In this case, it is important which factor should be based. This study compares and analyzes the contents of preamble to the Constitution based on, first subjects and procedures, second, history and future, third, justice, fourth, diversity, fifth, freedom and equality, sixth, peace and solidarity, and seventh, the Declaration of Federal Constitutions. In our country, whenever there is discussion on constitutional amendment, it is argued that the May 18 Democratization Movement and the June 1987 Struggle should be included in the Preamble to the Constitution. As the level of people’s awareness on Preamble to the Constitution gets higher, for example, there is an attempt to include the things which is difficult to add to the text of Constitution such as respectful treatment to civilian army activity. The comparison of Constitutions largely serves as a useful material for raising the awareness of Constitutions, contributing to the international reunification of Constitutions, and revising Constitutions. This study on the preamble to the Constitution around the world is thought to function as the criteria that can judge the effectiveness whether May 18 Democratization Movement and the June 1987 Struggle, which are being argued that it should be included in the Preamble to the Constitution, has such a value.
      번역하기

      Preamble to the Constitution refers to a sentence or provision placed before the text of the Constitution, which consists of a part of the Constitutions. Preamble to the Constitution declares the historical origin and the basic principle of constituti...

      Preamble to the Constitution refers to a sentence or provision placed before the text of the Constitution, which consists of a part of the Constitutions. Preamble to the Constitution declares the historical origin and the basic principle of constitution, and also declares its constitutional commitment. The purpose of Preamble to the Constitution is to identify the subject and the procedure of Constitutions as well as the motive, purpose and ideology of Constitution showing the identify of Constitutions, but it is not included in the text along with appendix, and is not essential element of written constituions. However, the written constitutions around the world have the preamble. This study targets total 16 countries that have Preamble to the Constitution including our country. What we want to obtain through the comparison of Constitutions is the accurate understanding of practical application of Constitutions, which are the target of comparison, and its ultimate goal is to secure the optimized constitutional normative power by specify the similarity or difference of preamble shown from individual and concrete application of each country. The comparison method of preamble to achieve this goal can be classified into formal aspect and practical aspect. Preamble to the Constitution is positioned in the front of text, so the actual benefit of comparison is not that big. Therefore, the core contents should be identified through practical aspect comparison. In this case, it is important which factor should be based. This study compares and analyzes the contents of preamble to the Constitution based on, first subjects and procedures, second, history and future, third, justice, fourth, diversity, fifth, freedom and equality, sixth, peace and solidarity, and seventh, the Declaration of Federal Constitutions. In our country, whenever there is discussion on constitutional amendment, it is argued that the May 18 Democratization Movement and the June 1987 Struggle should be included in the Preamble to the Constitution. As the level of people’s awareness on Preamble to the Constitution gets higher, for example, there is an attempt to include the things which is difficult to add to the text of Constitution such as respectful treatment to civilian army activity. The comparison of Constitutions largely serves as a useful material for raising the awareness of Constitutions, contributing to the international reunification of Constitutions, and revising Constitutions. This study on the preamble to the Constitution around the world is thought to function as the criteria that can judge the effectiveness whether May 18 Democratization Movement and the June 1987 Struggle, which are being argued that it should be included in the Preamble to the Constitution, has such a value.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2012

      2 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2010

      3 김철수, "헌법학신론" 박영사 2013

      4 이준일, "헌법학강의" 홍문사 2015

      5 김백유, "헌법학(Ⅰ)" 도서출판 조은 2010

      6 홍성방, "헌법학" 현암사 2005

      7 한수웅, "헌법학" 법문사 2014

      8 장영수, "헌법주석(Ⅰ)" 박영사 2013

      9 강승식, "헌법전문의 기능에 관한 비교법적 고찰" 법학연구소 13 (13): 75-99, 2012

      10 김종철, "헌법전문과 6월항쟁의 헌법적 의미 — 민주공화국 원리를 중심으로 —" 한국헌법학회 24 (24): 211-234, 2018

      1 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2012

      2 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2010

      3 김철수, "헌법학신론" 박영사 2013

      4 이준일, "헌법학강의" 홍문사 2015

      5 김백유, "헌법학(Ⅰ)" 도서출판 조은 2010

      6 홍성방, "헌법학" 현암사 2005

      7 한수웅, "헌법학" 법문사 2014

      8 장영수, "헌법주석(Ⅰ)" 박영사 2013

      9 강승식, "헌법전문의 기능에 관한 비교법적 고찰" 법학연구소 13 (13): 75-99, 2012

      10 김종철, "헌법전문과 6월항쟁의 헌법적 의미 — 민주공화국 원리를 중심으로 —" 한국헌법학회 24 (24): 211-234, 2018

      11 허 영, "헌법이론과 헌법" 박영사 2011

      12 도회근, "헌법 총강의 개정 필요성과 방향" 한국헌법학회 16 (16): 1-26, 2010

      13 정극원, "평화국가의 모델로서 유럽연합" 유럽헌법학회 (15) : 1-26, 2014

      14 박선영, "제19대 국회의장 직속 헌법개정자문위원회의 헌법전문과 총강부문 개정안에 대한 비교헌법학적 연구" 유럽헌법학회 (15) : 201-240, 2014

      15 이부하, "인권보장을 위한 비교헌법론" 법영사 2014

      16 정극원, "유럽국가의 기본권보장 체계와 규범내용" 유럽헌법학회 (25) : 1-30, 2017

      17 정극원, "유럽과 아시아국가 헌법의 비교 -독일, 스위스, 인도네시아 및 필리핀을 중심으로-" 유럽헌법학회 (30) : 337-359, 2019

      18 한병호, "유럽 지역 국가의 헌법전문에 대한 비교연구" 한국헌법학회 24 (24): 81-124, 2018

      19 정재황, "신헌법입문" 박영사 2018

      20 조동은, "스페인 1978년 헌법의 성립과정에 관한 연구" 유럽헌법학회 (20) : 111-162, 2016

      21 국회도서관, "세계의 헌법(Ⅰ), 세계의 헌법(Ⅱ)"

      22 김영환, "다양성과 그 가치" 백산출판사 2016

      23 김학태, "다문화사회의 사회통합을 위한 법정책 연구 - 한국과 EU의 사회통합 모델을 중심으로 -" 유럽헌법학회 (18) : 127-170, 2015

      24 정극원, "기본권으로서의 환경관과 국가목적규정으로서의 환경권" 한국공법학회 32 (32): 2003

      25 김영환, "憲法에서의 多樣性" 한국헌법학회 15 (15): 251-278, 2009

      26 韓柄鎬, "人間다운 生存의 憲法的 保障에 관한 연구 : 具體的 權利로서의 實現可能性을 중심으로" 서울大學校 大學院 1993

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼