RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 AHCI SCOPUS

      Discussions Concerning the Legality of the 1910 “Annexation” of Korea by Japan

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104988592

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The legality of Japan’s “annexation” of Korea under international law is an issue which forms the starting point and foundation of the bilateral relations between Korea and Japan. Therefore, it has been the object of acute confrontation between ...

      The legality of Japan’s “annexation” of Korea under international law is an issue which forms the starting point and foundation of the bilateral relations between Korea and Japan. Therefore, it has been the object of acute confrontation between the two states. The so-called Japanese legal responsibility for its colonial rule over Korea is directly affected by the answer to the issue. Theoretically speaking, this legality should be judged solely on the basis of the validity of the 1910 Annexation Treaty between Korea and Japan. However, discussions concerning this issue also cover the validity of a series of other treaties concluded in the process of Japanese plundering of the sovereignty of Korea from 1904 to 1910. The argument for the invalidity of these treaties relating to the “annexation" of Korea is grounded on two major points: firstly, the 1905 Treaty and the 1910 Annexation Treaty were concluded in coercion; and secondly, several of these treaties have formal and procedural defects. Examining the two points, this paper concludes that the treaties relating to the “annexation” of Korea borrowed the mere appearance of treaties and therefore cannot be deemed to be valid.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 장박진, "한일회담에서의 기본관계 조약 형성과정의 분석: 제 2조 '구조약 무효조항' 및 제 3조 '유일합법성 조항'을 중심으로" 국제학연구소 17 (17): 1-39, 2008

      2 박진희, "한국의 대일정책과 제1차~3차 한일회담" 수선사학회 25 (25): 83-112, 2006

      3 박배근, "한국병합관련조약의 효력과 국가 대표의 매수" 서울국제법연구원 17 (17): 155-178, 2010

      4 박배근, "시제법적 관점에서 본 한국병합관련 ‘조약’의 효력: 조약 체결의 형식과 절차를 중심으로" 대한국제법학회 54 (54): 91-118, 2009

      5 Kim, Chang-rok, "“Illegality” of the Korea-Japan Treaties in the Early 1900s" 20 (20): 2001

      6 Sakamoto, Shigeki, "Validity of the Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty: From the Perspective of the Treaty by Coercion" 44 (44): 1995

      7 Nishiyotsutsuji, Kimitaka, "Untold Stories of Foreign Relations during the Late Korean Empire Period" 1930

      8 Sasagawa, Norikatsu, "The Treaty Forced by Hitler and “Coercion of a State” in the Modern Sense-For the Positioning of the Protectorate Treaty of Korea. in: The Annexation of Korea and Modern Times" Akashi Shoten 2008

      9 Ariga, Nagao, "The Theory of Protectorate" Waseda University Press 1906

      10 Choi, Jong-go, "The Status of the Empire of Korea under International Law. in: The Forced Occupation of Korea by Japan" Kachi 1995

      1 장박진, "한일회담에서의 기본관계 조약 형성과정의 분석: 제 2조 '구조약 무효조항' 및 제 3조 '유일합법성 조항'을 중심으로" 국제학연구소 17 (17): 1-39, 2008

      2 박진희, "한국의 대일정책과 제1차~3차 한일회담" 수선사학회 25 (25): 83-112, 2006

      3 박배근, "한국병합관련조약의 효력과 국가 대표의 매수" 서울국제법연구원 17 (17): 155-178, 2010

      4 박배근, "시제법적 관점에서 본 한국병합관련 ‘조약’의 효력: 조약 체결의 형식과 절차를 중심으로" 대한국제법학회 54 (54): 91-118, 2009

      5 Kim, Chang-rok, "“Illegality” of the Korea-Japan Treaties in the Early 1900s" 20 (20): 2001

      6 Sakamoto, Shigeki, "Validity of the Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty: From the Perspective of the Treaty by Coercion" 44 (44): 1995

      7 Nishiyotsutsuji, Kimitaka, "Untold Stories of Foreign Relations during the Late Korean Empire Period" 1930

      8 Sasagawa, Norikatsu, "The Treaty Forced by Hitler and “Coercion of a State” in the Modern Sense-For the Positioning of the Protectorate Treaty of Korea. in: The Annexation of Korea and Modern Times" Akashi Shoten 2008

      9 Ariga, Nagao, "The Theory of Protectorate" Waseda University Press 1906

      10 Choi, Jong-go, "The Status of the Empire of Korea under International Law. in: The Forced Occupation of Korea by Japan" Kachi 1995

      11 Park, Pae-Keun, "The Meaning and Limitations of the Arguments concerning the Validity of the Treaties Related to the Annexation of Korea by Japan" 44 : 2003

      12 Kang, Seong-eun, "The Eulsa Five-Article Treaty and the Process of Conclusion by Force, Seen through the Primary Sources. in: The Annexation of Korea and Modern Times" Akashi Shoten 2008

      13 Sasagawa, Norikatsu, "The Annexation of Korea and Modern Times" Akashi Shoten 2008

      14 Lee, Tae-Jin, "The Annexation of Korea Was Not Established: Japan’s Usurpation of the Sovereignty of the Empire of Korea and the Treaty by Coercion, Part 2" 651 : 185-196, 1998

      15 Lee, Tae-Jin, "The Annexation of Korea Was Not Established: Japan’s Usurpation of the Sovereignty of the Empire of Korea and the Treaty by Coercion, Part 1" 650 : 300-310, 1998

      16 Lee, Tae-Jin, "The Annexation of Korea Was Not Established" Taehaksa 2001

      17 Duus, Peter, "The Abacus and the Sword: The Japanese Penetration of Korea 1895-1910" University of California Press 1995

      18 Unno, Fukuju, "The 2nd Japan-Korea Agreement and the Five Ministers’ Memorial to the Throne" 25 (25): 109-143, 2005

      19 United Nations, "Reports of International Arbitral Awards. Vol. II"

      20 Lee, Sang Chan, "Reexamination of the Records on the Eulsa Treaty in the Records of the Japanese Legation in Korea and Japanese Diplomatic Documents"

      21 Lee, Keun-Gwan, "Reexamination of Theories of Coercion in International Treaty Law. in: Studies on the Illegality of the Annexation of Korea" Seoul National University Press 2003

      22 Lee, Tae-Jin, "Procedural Illegality of Treaties to Usurp the Sovereignty of Korea in 1904-1910. in: Studies on the Illegality of the Annexation of Korea" Seoul National University Press 2003

      23 Oppenheim, L., "Peace. Vol. 1 of International Law, A Treatise" Longmans, Green, and Co 1905

      24 Lee, Tae-Jin, "Only Treaties Relating to the Invasion of Korea, Violated Formal Requirements" 659 : 249-268, 1999

      25 Rey, Francis, "La situation internationale de la Corée" Revue générale de droit international public 13-, 1906

      26 Sasagawa, Norikatsu, "Japan-Korea Treaties in the Period of Traditional International Law (1904-1910)—Legal Issues over the Coercion of a Treaty. in: The Annexation of Korea and Modern Times" Akashi Shoten 2008

      27 Paik, Choong-Hyun, "Issues of Korea-Japan Treaties of the 1900s in the Light of International Law" 19 : 1996

      28 Lee, Tae-Jin, "Is It Possible to Transfer the Sovereignty in a Summary Arrangement?: In Response to Professor Unno’s Criticism, Part 2" 674 : 272-281, 2000

      29 Lee, Tae-Jin, "Is It Possible to Transfer the Sovereignty in a Summary Arrangement?: In Response to Professor Unno’s Criticism, Part 1" 674 : 246-255, 2000

      30 Unno, Fukuju, "Historical Consciousness of the Annexation of Korea: Reexamination of Professor Lee’s Theory of the Non-establishment of the Annexation of Korea" 666 : 260-274, 1999

      31 Unno, Fukuju, "From the Protection to the Annexation of Korea by Japan" Memoirs of the Institute of Humanities, Meiji University 1999

      32 Rousseau, Charles, "Droit International Public. Tome I: Introduction et Sources" Editions Sirey 1970

      33 Harada, Damaki, "Conclusion of the 2nd Japan-Korea Agreement and Korea’s Emperor Gojong" 24 (24): 141-172, 2004

      34 Paik, Choong-Hyun, "An Analysis of Japan’s Annexation of Korea in the Light of International Law. in: Studies on the Illegality of the Annexation of Korea" Seoul National University Press 2003

      35 Sasagawa, Norikatsu, "Aiming at Legal Conversation between Japan and Korea" 663 : 1999

      36 이태진, "1905년 「보호조약」에 대한 고종황제의 협상지종설 비판" 역사학회 185 (185): 107-140, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2018-11-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      2017-03-07 학회명변경 영문명 : The Academy of Korean -> The Academy of Korean Studies KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 A&HCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.19 0.1 0.24
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.2 0.394 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼