RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    여성과 속박  :  사무엘 리처드슨의 『클래리사』 Samuel Richardson;s Clarissa = Woman and Captivity

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19551798

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    One of the perpetual themes in literature is the escape from captivity. Captivity, or the lack of freedom, refers to a person's inner and outer situation. We always want freedom, yet a paradoxical truth is that we sometimes submit to captivity for the sake of safety. We sometimes believe that we are completely free simply because we fail to figure out what really captures us. Samuel Richardson's Clarissa, in this sense, appeals quite powerfully to us, showing what captivity is and how a particular human being struggles to get out of it.
    This paper is to discuss how a young woman is agonizing and struggling to get out of captivity, imposed on her by the society in a certain time and place (the 18th century, middle-class, puritan society, to be exact) and how her attempts construct a profound human tragedy. First of all, I examine the form and structure of the novel as a whole, which significantly manifest the theme of captivity. And then I analyze Clarissa as an individual virtuous self, captivated by a false ideology of her society. When there is a harmony between Clarissa's own individual morality and that of society, she enjoys her freedom as well as being a paragon of virtue. Yet when she claims to be free and independent in marriage against her family's-her father's and brother's-wish, her happiness suddenly falls down, and she is practically imprisoned in her house. She desperately tries to prove that the mercantile view and parental authority of the Harlowe family are wrong. But the power lies with the family.
    Clarissa's escape from her family puts her in another kind of captivity devised by Lovelace, an aristocrat rake who is captured in between his libertine principle and his love for her. Different as their individual situations may be, the two protagonists are the same in struggling to get out of captivity. The rape of Clarissa by Lovelace reflects his desperation while forcing her to realize that she cannot be free from the society and its ideology. Clarissa refuses to accept her realistic situation in which a young woman naturally marry the man that violates her chastity or bring him to the court. Her final resolution is to escape permanently from her body, dramatizing it as a melodramatic death of a virtuous woman.
    The novel shows that an individual can never be free from the captivity imposed by the society as long as one remains in it, and this constitutes an ultimate human dilemma. Time has changed since Richardson observed a young girl's struggle to escape from the male chauvinistic middle class puritan ideology, but the situation, the conflict between the society as a blind power and an individual desire to be free, remains the same. The captivity Clarissa has met becomes our problem in our society and our time.
    번역하기

    One of the perpetual themes in literature is the escape from captivity. Captivity, or the lack of freedom, refers to a person's inner and outer situation. We always want freedom, yet a paradoxical truth is that we sometimes submit to captivity for the...

    One of the perpetual themes in literature is the escape from captivity. Captivity, or the lack of freedom, refers to a person's inner and outer situation. We always want freedom, yet a paradoxical truth is that we sometimes submit to captivity for the sake of safety. We sometimes believe that we are completely free simply because we fail to figure out what really captures us. Samuel Richardson's Clarissa, in this sense, appeals quite powerfully to us, showing what captivity is and how a particular human being struggles to get out of it.
    This paper is to discuss how a young woman is agonizing and struggling to get out of captivity, imposed on her by the society in a certain time and place (the 18th century, middle-class, puritan society, to be exact) and how her attempts construct a profound human tragedy. First of all, I examine the form and structure of the novel as a whole, which significantly manifest the theme of captivity. And then I analyze Clarissa as an individual virtuous self, captivated by a false ideology of her society. When there is a harmony between Clarissa's own individual morality and that of society, she enjoys her freedom as well as being a paragon of virtue. Yet when she claims to be free and independent in marriage against her family's-her father's and brother's-wish, her happiness suddenly falls down, and she is practically imprisoned in her house. She desperately tries to prove that the mercantile view and parental authority of the Harlowe family are wrong. But the power lies with the family.
    Clarissa's escape from her family puts her in another kind of captivity devised by Lovelace, an aristocrat rake who is captured in between his libertine principle and his love for her. Different as their individual situations may be, the two protagonists are the same in struggling to get out of captivity. The rape of Clarissa by Lovelace reflects his desperation while forcing her to realize that she cannot be free from the society and its ideology. Clarissa refuses to accept her realistic situation in which a young woman naturally marry the man that violates her chastity or bring him to the court. Her final resolution is to escape permanently from her body, dramatizing it as a melodramatic death of a virtuous woman.
    The novel shows that an individual can never be free from the captivity imposed by the society as long as one remains in it, and this constitutes an ultimate human dilemma. Time has changed since Richardson observed a young girl's struggle to escape from the male chauvinistic middle class puritan ideology, but the situation, the conflict between the society as a blind power and an individual desire to be free, remains the same. The captivity Clarissa has met becomes our problem in our society and our time.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼