RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    포괄적 사용성 평가를 통한 인체공학적 군용 장비 디자인 개선: 대한민국 육군 전투조끼 사례 연구 = Improving Military Gear Design through Comprehensive Usability Evaluation: A Case Study on ROK Army Combat Vests

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109915552

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Objective: This study aims to identify ergonomic challenges in Republic of Korea (ROK) Army combat vests through a comprehensive usability evaluation and propose targeted design improvements.
    Background: To enhance combat effectiveness and survivability amid declining troop numbers, the ROK Army has promoted the Warrior Platform initiative to modernize individual combat systems. Combat vests with Modular Lightweight Loadcarrying Equipment (MOLLE) have been deployed, but issues remain regarding load burden, mobility restriction, and poor ergonomic fit. Prior evaluations have relied heavily on subjective evaluation and lacked scientific criteria. A structured, data-driven evaluation approach is therefore essential to validate usability and inform design optimization.
    Method: Three combat vest designs (Designs A – C) were evaluated with four activeduty ROK Army soldiers. The study incorporated a multifaceted evaluation protocol, including design and size analysis, clothing pressure measurement, joint range of motion (ROM) analysis, and a subjective usability survey. Clothing pressure was measured using pneumatic sensors, and joint ROMs were assessed with an IMUbased motion capture system.
    Results: The evaluation revealed noticeable differences in neckline configuration, armhole depth, strap placement, waist belt structure, and MOLLE capacity. Design A exhibited the highest pressure at the shoulders and back. Design B demonstrated effective load distribution but restricted lumbar mobility to a degree, due to an added support strap. Design C allowed better mobility but lacked adequate stability.
    Subjective evaluation aligned with the quantitative findings with participants favoring Design B. Based on the results, improvements were suggested, including refining armhole curves, extending the hemline, and repositioning straps.
    Conclusion: The findings highlight how specific design elements impact wearability and mobility, offering evidence-based guidance for selecting and enhancing ROK Army combat vest designs.
    Application: The evaluation protocol established in this study can be applied to other military and performance gears to identify design opportunities and guide future development strategies.
    번역하기

    Objective: This study aims to identify ergonomic challenges in Republic of Korea (ROK) Army combat vests through a comprehensive usability evaluation and propose targeted design improvements. Background: To enhance combat effectiveness and survivabili...

    Objective: This study aims to identify ergonomic challenges in Republic of Korea (ROK) Army combat vests through a comprehensive usability evaluation and propose targeted design improvements.
    Background: To enhance combat effectiveness and survivability amid declining troop numbers, the ROK Army has promoted the Warrior Platform initiative to modernize individual combat systems. Combat vests with Modular Lightweight Loadcarrying Equipment (MOLLE) have been deployed, but issues remain regarding load burden, mobility restriction, and poor ergonomic fit. Prior evaluations have relied heavily on subjective evaluation and lacked scientific criteria. A structured, data-driven evaluation approach is therefore essential to validate usability and inform design optimization.
    Method: Three combat vest designs (Designs A – C) were evaluated with four activeduty ROK Army soldiers. The study incorporated a multifaceted evaluation protocol, including design and size analysis, clothing pressure measurement, joint range of motion (ROM) analysis, and a subjective usability survey. Clothing pressure was measured using pneumatic sensors, and joint ROMs were assessed with an IMUbased motion capture system.
    Results: The evaluation revealed noticeable differences in neckline configuration, armhole depth, strap placement, waist belt structure, and MOLLE capacity. Design A exhibited the highest pressure at the shoulders and back. Design B demonstrated effective load distribution but restricted lumbar mobility to a degree, due to an added support strap. Design C allowed better mobility but lacked adequate stability.
    Subjective evaluation aligned with the quantitative findings with participants favoring Design B. Based on the results, improvements were suggested, including refining armhole curves, extending the hemline, and repositioning straps.
    Conclusion: The findings highlight how specific design elements impact wearability and mobility, offering evidence-based guidance for selecting and enhancing ROK Army combat vest designs.
    Application: The evaluation protocol established in this study can be applied to other military and performance gears to identify design opportunities and guide future development strategies.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼