목적물의 후발적 멸실이 매매ㆍ임대차에 미치는 영향

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

According to the traditional view, when the leased property is partially damaged or destroyed without any fault of the lessee, the lessee can assert a claim for the diminished leasehold interest. Or, in case where the purpose of lease contract is frustrated with the remaining interest, the lessee can seek cancellation of the contract. However, under the same view, if the leasehold estate is damaged or destroyed due to the fault of the lessee, the lessee is barred from making the claim. Further, where the subject of the lease contract is completely destroyed, the lease is thereby cancelled. In such cases, the party with fault is liable to the other party for compensation.
However, (1) in the cases of complete destruction, there is no ground for automatic termination of contract -- contract terminations are chages of legal relationships, and such changes require mutual consents or relevant statutory provisions, but in such cases, there are neither consent nor statutory provisions for such terminations, (2) there can be overprotection for the lessees at the expense of the lessors, if the system allows a lessee who intentionally destroys the subject of the contract to terminate the lease with the willingness to pay the compensations to be received from the lease payment obligations remaining under the original leases. Moreover, (3) a third party creditor to the lessor may be injured if the lessor cannot collect any further payments from the lessee, if the lessor’s obligation to the creditor is secured with the future lease payments from the lessee due to the termination of the contract for the complete destruction of the subject.
In light of the above, this paper maintains that, for partial destruction cases, section 627 shall apply. As for complete destruction or partial destructions due to the fault of the lessee, general termination theories and allocation of risks theory and section 627 shall be applied to the issues involving the lessee’s duty to return the property at the end of the lease and the duty to pay lease payments and the lessor’s duty to return deposits.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최승록, "재판자료 제71집" 법원도서관 1996

2 강동욱, "임차건물이 원인불명 화재로 소실된 경우의 법률관계" 민사판례연구회 23 : 2001

3 소재선, "임대인의 임차인에 대한 안전배려의무" 청림출판 (411) : 2006

4 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2016

5 사법연수원, "민사실무 Ⅱ" 사법연수원 2015

6 김홍엽, "민사소송법" 박영사 2017

7 호문혁, "민사소송법" 법문사 2016

8 곽윤직, "민법총칙[민법강의Ⅰ]" 박영사 2015

9 양형우, "민법의 세계" 피앤씨미디어 2017

10 김준호, "민법강의" 法文社 2017

11 곽윤직, "물권법[민법강의Ⅱ]" 박영사 2015

12 양창수, "독일민법전" 博英社 2008

13 양창수, "권리의 보전과 담보(민법Ⅲ)" 博英社 2015

14 양창수, "권리의 변동과 구제(민법Ⅱ)" 博英社 2015

15 양창수, "계약법(민법Ⅰ)" 博英社 2015

16 김용담, "註釋民法 물권(3)" 韓國司法行政學會 2011

17 지원림, "民法講義" 弘文社 2015

18 곽윤직, "民法注解 (Ⅵ, Ⅸ, ⅩⅢ, ⅩⅣ, ⅩⅤ)" 薄英社 2001

19 송덕수, "新민법강의" 博英社 2016