축사 주변의 악취 및 부유분진의 CALPUFF 모델링: 계사 중심으로 = CALPUFF Modeling of Odor/suspended Particulate in the Vicinity of Poultry Farms

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구에서는 시간별 실제 기상데이터를 토대로 한 CALPUFF 모델링 수행을 통하여 민원지역에 대한 신뢰성이 있는 모델링 결과를 도출하였다. 무창형 계사 P1 및 P2의 방진망 구조물(chamber) 및 개방형 계사 P3로부터의 오염원 배출 및 확산거동을, 부피오염원으로서의 CALPUFF 모델링 또는 각 방향의 배출면적을 가중치로 한 수직 배기의 평균 선속도인 모델 배출 선속도(u^M_y )를 적용한 점오염원으로서의 최종 CALPUFF 모델링으로 구현하였다. 또한 계사 P1, P2 및 P3에서의 배출되는 악취 및 분진오염원 배출량에 대한 각각의 제거효율(0, 20, 50 및 80%) 또는 각각 대응되는 emission rate (100, 80, 50 및 20%)에 따른 시나리오를 기본으로, CALPUFF 모델링을 수행하여 각각에 대한 민원지역의 농도예측을 수행하였다. 이러한 민원지역에 대한 암모니아, 황화수소, PM_2.5 및 PM₁₀에 대한 농도예측과 악취방지법 및 대기환경법에서 요구되는 오염물질 농도와 비교하여, 계사 P1, P2 및 P3에 요구되는 암모니아, 황화수소, PM_2.5 및 PM₁₀에 대한 제거율을 산정하였다. 그 결과로서, “P1, P2 및 P3에서 각각의 배출농도를 줄인 비율만큼 각각의 discrete receptor에서의 농도가 같은 비율로 감소한다”는 가정(a priori assumption)이 본 CALPUFF 모델링 범위 내에서 적용 가능함이 입증되었다. 한편 부피오염원을 적용한 CALPUFF 모델링을 수행한 경우에서 방지시설의 요구되는 제거효율은, 점오염원을 적용한 CALPUFF 모델링을 수행한 경우와 비교하였을 때에 P1의 경우에는 상호간에 유사하였으나, P2와 P3에서 암모니아와 PM₁₀의 경우에 더 높게 나타났다. 그럼에도 불구하고 민원해결을 위한 안전한 접근방법으로서 부피오염원으로서 CALPUFF 모델링을 선정하였다. 이에 따라서 본 연구에서는 암모니아, 황화수소, PM_2.5 및 PM₁₀와 같은 오염원배출에 대하여 무창형 계사 P1 및 P2에 요구되는 정량적 방지수준을 타당하게 도출하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this study, CALPUFF modeling was performed, using a real surface and upper air meterological data to predict trustworthy modeling-results. Pollutant-releases from windscreen chambers of enclosed poultry farms, P1 and P2, and from a open poultry farm, P3, and their diffusing behavior were modeled by CALPUFF modeling with volume sources as well as by finally-adjusted CALPUFF modeling where a linear velocity of upward-exit gas averaged with the weight of each directional-emitting area was applied as a model-linear velocity (u^M_y) at a stack, with point sources. In addition, based upon the scenario of poultry farm-releasing odor and particulate matter (PM) removal efficiencies of 0, 20, 50 and 80% or their corresponding emission rates of 100, 80, 50 and 20%, respectively, CALPUFF modeling was performed and concentrations of odor and PM were predicted at the region as a discrete receptor where civil complaints had been frequently filed. The predicted concentrations of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ were compared with those required to meet according to the offensive odor control law or the atmospheric environmental law. Subseu quently their required removal efficiencies at poultry farms of P1, P2 and P3 were estimated. As a result, a priori assumption that pollutant concentrations at their discrete receptors are reduced by the same fraction as pollutant concentrations at P1, P2 and P3 as volume source or point source, were controlled and reduced, was proven applicable in this study. In case of volume source-adopted CALPUFF modeling, its required removal efficiencies of P1 compared with those of point source-adopted CALPUFF modeling, were predicted similar each other. However, In case of volume source-adopted CALPUFF modeling, its required removal efficiencies of both ammonia and PM₁₀ at not only P2 but also P3 were predicted higher than those of point source-adopted CALPUFF modeling. Nonetheless, the volume source-adopted CALPUFF modeling was preferred as a safe approach to resolve civil complaints. Accordingly, the required degrees of pollution prevention against ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ at P1 and P2, were estimated in a proper manner.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 황보종, "실험 무창육계사의 환경효율 분석" 한국축산학회 44 (44): 475-482, 2002

2 이은주, "구미국가산업단지의 트리메틸아민 악취모델링" 한국화학공학회 54 (54): 187-199, 2016

3 이은주, "구미국가산업단지의 아세트알데히드 악취모델링" 한국화학공학회 54 (54): 22-35, 2016

4 김기연, "계사(鷄舍) 유형별 악취물질의 시간적 실내 농도 분포 특성" 한국실내환경학회 10 (10): 69-82, 2013

5 김기연, "계사(鷄舍) 악취 물질의 발생 분포 특성에 관한 연구" 한국냄새환경학회 11 (11): 105-111, 2012

6 Turner, D. B., "Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates"

7 Roumeliotis, T. S., "Summary of Ammonia and Particulate Matter Emission Factors for Poultry Operations" 17 : 305-314, 2008

8 Laupsa, H., "Source Apportionment of Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in An Urban Area Using Dispersion, Receptor and Inverse Modeling" 43 : 4733-4744, 2009

9 Bokowa, A. H., "Review of Odour Legislation" 23 : 31-36, 2010

10 Jester, R. C., "Respiratory Health on the Poultry Farm"

11 Lacey, R. E., "Particulate Matter and Ammonia Emission Factors for Tunnel-ventilated Broiler Production Houses in the Southern U.S" 46 (46): 1203-1214, 2003

12 Kim, K. Y., "On Site Evaluation on Odor Emissions from Livestock Manure Composting Facilities in the Han River Basin" 43 (43): 1005-1018, 2001

13 Gay, S. W., "Odor, Total Reduced Sulfur, and Ammonia Emissions from Animal Housing Facilities and Manure Storage Units in Minnesota" 347-360, 2003

14 Smeets, M. A. M., "Odor and Irritation Thresholds for Ammonia : A Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Olfactometry" 32 : 11-20, 2007

15 Navaratnasamy, M., "Odor Emissions from Poultry Manure/litter and Barns" Poultry industry council 2004

16 Hadlocon, L. S., "Modeling of Particulate Matter Dispersion from a Poultry Facility Using AERMOD" 65 (65): 206-217, 2015

17 Vieira de Melo, A. M., "Modeling of Odour Dispersion Around a Pig Farm Building Complex Using AERMOD and CALPUFF: Comparison with Wind Tunnel Results" 56 : 8-20, 2012

18 Caputo, M., "Intercomparison of Dispersion Models" 37 : 2435-2449, 2003

19 Gustafsson, G., "Factors Affecting the Release and Concentration of Dust in Pig House" 74 : 379-390, 1999

20 Okutani, F., "Evaluation of"Open Essence"Odor Identification Test Card by Application to Healthy Volunteers" 40 : 76-80, 2013

21 Kulik, A., "Europe Cultivates Organics Treatment" 39 : 37-40, 1996

22 Kazutaka, K., "Emissions of Malodorous Compounds and Greenhouse Gases from Composting Swine Feces" 56 : 265-271, 1996

23 Kuroda, K., "Emission of Malodorous Compounds and Greenhouse Gases from Composting Swine Feces" 56 : 265-271, 1995

24 Mark Dunlop, "Control of Odor and Dust from Chicken Sheds:Review of “add-on” Technologies" 2009

25 Hartung, J., "Control of Gaseous Emissions from Livestock Buildings and Manure Stores" 57 : 173-189, 1994

26 Koerkamp, P. W. G., "Concentrations and Emissions of Ammonia in Livestock Buildings in Northern Europe" 70 : 79-95, 1998

27 Wathes, C. M., "Concentrations and Emissions Rates of Aerial Ammonia, Nitrous Oxide, Methane, Carbon Oxide, Dust and Endo-toxin in UK Broiler and Layer Houses" 38 : 14-28, 1997

28 Ramiro, G. M., "Compatibility of Ammonia Suppressants Used in Poultry Litter with Mushroom Compost Preparation and Production" 97 (97): 1679-1686, 2006

29 Wang, L., "Comparison of CALPUFF and ISCST3 Models for Predicting Downward Odor and Source Emission Rates" 40 : 4663-4669, 2006

30 Sang Jin Jeong, "CALPUFF and AERMOD Dispersion Models for Estimating Odor Emissions from Industrial Complex Area Sources" 한국대기환경학회 5 (5): 1-7, 2011

31 Nicell, J. A., "Assessment and Regulation of Odour Impacts" 43 : 196-206, 2009

32 "Air dispersion modeling guidelines for Arizona air quality permits, Air quality division of Arizona department of environmental quality"

33 Lim, T.-T., "Air Quality Measurements at a Laying Hen House: Particulate Matter Concentrations and Emissions" 2003

34 Scire, J. S., "A User’s guide for the CALPUFF dispersion model, version 5" Earth Tech, Inc. 2000

35 Homes, N. S., "A Review of Dispersion Modelling and Its Application to the Dispersion of Particles : An Overview of Different Dispersion Models Available" 40 : 5902-5928, 2006

36 Ghannam, K., "A Framework for Emissions Source Apportionment in Industrial Areas: MM5/CALPUFF in a Near-Field Application" 63 (63): 190-204, 2013

37 Hinz, T., "A Comprehensive Experimental Study of Aerial Pollutants in and Emissions from Livestock Buildings:Part 2. Results" 70 : 119-129, 1998

38 Ranzato, L., "A Comparison of Methods for the Assessment of Odor Impacts on Air Quality: Field Inspection (VDI 3940) and the Air Dispersion Model CALPUFF" 61 : 570-579, 2012