RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    일본의 사법제도 개혁의 현황과 과제 = A Study of the Reform of Japanese Judicial System

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5011482

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In Japan, after the Meiji Restoration and the postwar reform, the third reform was planned under the ideas of neo-liberalism in the 1980s and genuinely proceeded since the 1990s. This reform was based upon political reform, administrative reform, promotion of de-centralization and de-regulation. In order to achieve the reform, the main task was the reform of judicial system. On July 1999, the Judicial Reform Council (JRC) was established in the Cabinet, which held deliberation meetings for sixty-three times. The JRC drew up a statement based upon the result of deliberation that was delivered to the Cabinet on June 2001.
    According to the statement, the reform of judicial system should be based upon plans of economic structure reform, such as political and administrative reform, promotion of de-centralization and de-regulation, and these should be combined with the principles of the Constitution. The main task of the judicial system reform will therefore be the re-construction of the country's shape. According to the JRC, the fundamental task of the judicial system reform should be based upon how the spirit of law and the rule of law achieve the law of nation flesh and blood of the country and its shape. Moreover, the reform should also find out what needs to achieve the individual' right and the people's sovereignty.
    In order to materialize the fundamental task of the judicial system reform, the JRC indicates three main criteria, such as the improvement of institutional base, the amplification of human resources and the establishment of nation base. The embodiment of the reform has been conducted to the introduction of Law School and Citizen Judge System, the establishment of Judicial Support Center, the revision of Administrative Case Litigation Law, the foundation of Intellectual Property High Court, the adoption of Labor Umpire System.
    This study aims to look at the reform of judicial system in Japan, and to examine its outcome in order to have some suggestion for the reform of judicial system in Korea.
    번역하기

    In Japan, after the Meiji Restoration and the postwar reform, the third reform was planned under the ideas of neo-liberalism in the 1980s and genuinely proceeded since the 1990s. This reform was based upon political reform, administrative reform, pro...

    In Japan, after the Meiji Restoration and the postwar reform, the third reform was planned under the ideas of neo-liberalism in the 1980s and genuinely proceeded since the 1990s. This reform was based upon political reform, administrative reform, promotion of de-centralization and de-regulation. In order to achieve the reform, the main task was the reform of judicial system. On July 1999, the Judicial Reform Council (JRC) was established in the Cabinet, which held deliberation meetings for sixty-three times. The JRC drew up a statement based upon the result of deliberation that was delivered to the Cabinet on June 2001.
    According to the statement, the reform of judicial system should be based upon plans of economic structure reform, such as political and administrative reform, promotion of de-centralization and de-regulation, and these should be combined with the principles of the Constitution. The main task of the judicial system reform will therefore be the re-construction of the country's shape. According to the JRC, the fundamental task of the judicial system reform should be based upon how the spirit of law and the rule of law achieve the law of nation flesh and blood of the country and its shape. Moreover, the reform should also find out what needs to achieve the individual' right and the people's sovereignty.
    In order to materialize the fundamental task of the judicial system reform, the JRC indicates three main criteria, such as the improvement of institutional base, the amplification of human resources and the establishment of nation base. The embodiment of the reform has been conducted to the introduction of Law School and Citizen Judge System, the establishment of Judicial Support Center, the revision of Administrative Case Litigation Law, the foundation of Intellectual Property High Court, the adoption of Labor Umpire System.
    This study aims to look at the reform of judicial system in Japan, and to examine its outcome in order to have some suggestion for the reform of judicial system in Korea.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
    • Ⅱ. 재판소 조직 및 법조제도의 변화
    • Ⅲ. 법조양성제도의 개혁
    • Ⅳ. 재판원제도
    • Ⅴ. 사법 네트워크
    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
    • Ⅱ. 재판소 조직 및 법조제도의 변화
    • Ⅲ. 법조양성제도의 개혁
    • Ⅳ. 재판원제도
    • Ⅴ. 사법 네트워크
    • Ⅵ. 맺음말 : 시사점을 중심으로
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이동원, "헌법재판제도에 관한 일본에서의 논의 헌법재판제도의 이해" 92 : 2001년.

    2 笹川紀勝, "일본의 「사법개혁」의 방향" 7 (7): 2002

    3 이상윤, "일본국헌법상 국민의 사법참가에 관한 연구" 5 (5): 2004년5월.

    4 김창록, "일본 사법개혁 논의의 경과와 현황 - 법과대학원제도의 도입을 중심으로" 2004년4월.

    5 "사법개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅴ) 제14차-제27차 회의자료" 사법개혁위원회 2005년1월.

    6 "사법개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅲ) 제1차-제13차 회의자료" 2004년5월.

    7 "사법개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅱ) 제1차-제13차 회의자료" 사법개혁위원회 2004년5월.

    8 飯考行, "韓?の裁判官制度改革" (599) : 2004年11月.

    9 尹龍澤, "韓?の司法改革の特色と?容" (599) : 2004年11月.

    10 池田修, "解?裁判員法" 弘文堂 2005年.

    1 이동원, "헌법재판제도에 관한 일본에서의 논의 헌법재판제도의 이해" 92 : 2001년.

    2 笹川紀勝, "일본의 「사법개혁」의 방향" 7 (7): 2002

    3 이상윤, "일본국헌법상 국민의 사법참가에 관한 연구" 5 (5): 2004년5월.

    4 김창록, "일본 사법개혁 논의의 경과와 현황 - 법과대학원제도의 도입을 중심으로" 2004년4월.

    5 "사법개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅴ) 제14차-제27차 회의자료" 사법개혁위원회 2005년1월.

    6 "사법개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅲ) 제1차-제13차 회의자료" 2004년5월.

    7 "사법개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅱ) 제1차-제13차 회의자료" 사법개혁위원회 2004년5월.

    8 飯考行, "韓?の裁判官制度改革" (599) : 2004年11月.

    9 尹龍澤, "韓?の司法改革の特色と?容" (599) : 2004年11月.

    10 池田修, "解?裁判員法" 弘文堂 2005年.

    11 大久保太, "裁判員制度案批判(?)(下)" 1772 : 2002年.

    12 特集, "裁判員制度の導入" 1268 : 2004年6月.

    13 香成敏磨, "裁判員制度の合憲性" 2004

    14 笹田?司, "裁判員制度と日本?憲法" 77 (77): 2005年4月.

    15 ?嶋裕之, "法曹養成制度改革の課題" 77 (77): 2005年7月.

    16 ?嶋裕之, "法曹養成制度改革の成果と課題" (594) : 2004年06月.

    17 大石和彦, "民の司法?加」をめぐる憲法問題" 18 : 2001年.

    18 西野喜一, "日本?憲法と裁判員制度(下)" 2005

    19 土田和博, "新自由主義的司法制度改革と憲法原理" 73 (73): 2001年5月.

    20 土屋美明, "市民の司法は?現したか" 花?社 2005年.

    21 "司法改革: 市民のための司法をめざして" 日本評論社 2005年.

    22 "司法制度改革審議?意見書: 21世紀の日本を支える司法制度" 司法制度改革審議 2001年6月.

    23 笹田?司, "司法における?門性と?民?加" 44 (44): 2002年.

    24 特集, "刑事裁判における裁判員制度の導入" (57) : 2004年9月.

    25 市川正人, "?民?加と裁判員制度" 76 (76): 2004年.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.08 1.08 1.06
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.04 0.96 1.025 0.31
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼