This dissertation examined the impacts of the welfare reform program, California Work Pays Demonstration Program (CWPDP), implemented in 1992. CWPDP was designed to move welfare recipients into the labor market by reducing the amount of AFDC grants an...
This dissertation examined the impacts of the welfare reform program, California Work Pays Demonstration Program (CWPDP), implemented in 1992. CWPDP was designed to move welfare recipients into the labor market by reducing the amount of AFDC grants and by revoking the time limit on the $30 and one-third earned income disregard.
The evaluation of the policy impacts on the welfare recipients was conducted in three areas: employment, earnings, and the exit rate from welfare. The research hypothesis that CWPDP had positive impacts on the employment and earnings of female heads on aid was established by the literature review. For the subject of exit rates, an a priori hypothesis was not established because CWPDP was expected to have two countervailing effects on the transition rate.
This study used a subset of a database created by the California Department of Social Services, and University of California Data Archive and Technical Assistance. The subset is composed of 3,936 AFDC-FG cases selected in LA County: 1,311 control cases and 2,625 experimental cases. The control group was kept on the AFDC rules as of September 1992, while the experimental group was subject to AFDC rule changes implemented under CWPDP. Earnings data for 12 quarters were employed (the first quarter of 1993 through the second quarter 1996) for analysis of employment and earnings. Monthly data on aid receipt covering 117 consecutive months from January 1987 through September 1996 were used for analysis of exit rates.
The analyses of the employment and earnings using the random effects probit model and the random effects regression model, respectively, indicated that CWPDP did not effectively encourage female heads to participate in the labor market. It also revealed that CWPDP did not significantly increase the earnings of female heads. The analysis of exit rates, using three event history models, showed that CWPDP kept families on aid longer, but the impact was small.
The findings imply that the disincentive structure of the public assistance program is not the main barrier preventing female heads from getting jobs and leaving the welfare rolls. Rather, participation in the labor market and exit from welfare is mainly determined by their own demographic characteristics and the economic cycle.
Based on the findings, policy implications including a fortified EITC, affordable child care services, a flexible exemption rate of TANF, and guaranteed public jobs are suggested in this study.