RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    現代 英語 動詞群 變換 構造類型 硏究  :  動詞 + 構造變形詞 連語를 中心으로 = Transformational Relations for Verb-Particle Sequences in Contemporary English

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3224509

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There are many examples of verb-particle relations in contemporary English. In recent years there has teen an increasing interest in the study of verb-particle sequences. Especially during the last decade or two, remarkable progress has been made in applying techniques of modern linguistic methodology to scientific investigation which focuses on the dynamic aspects of linguistic behavior.
    Previous work has contributed greatly to a fuller understanding of the problems involved in this knotty area of English syntax, and valuable analysis and suggestions have been made toward a satisfactory solution. It may be said, however, that we need a more comprehensive and suitable study on verb-particle relations, particularily for the benefit of Korean students of English, with some explanation based on a constrative analysis between Korean and English.
    The verb-particle sequence is a unique linguistic unit which is used extensively in all forms of communication. The term "particle" has been differently defined by different scholars. I would like to use the word "particles" in a broad sense, for the following reasons: The term particle can easily serve as a cover term for (a) prepositional use, (b) adverbial use, and (c) overlapping or neutral use.
    A verb-particle sequence is, then, a unit consisting of a verb with an added particle or particles, with or without object, which may show, as a whole, a unique meaning which is other than the combined meaning of the parts together.
    There is a structural marker to distinguish one type of verb-particle sequence from another. The marker in the construction consists of "stress and juncture signal" in the verb phrase. This is well demonstrated in the following examples:
    The horse pu´lled down | the hill. (1)
    The horse pu´lled | down the hill. (2)
    In (1) and (2) we note two possible sequences. When two strong stress fall on both pull and down in setence (1) with the possibility of a slight break, we have an indication of verb + adverb sequence, whereas when a strong stress falls on pull and a weaker stress on down in sentence (2), with the possibility of a break between the two, it shows a verb + preposition sequence.
    There are three types of particles in sequences: (1) post-verbal particle, (2) pre-nominal particle and (3) overlapping particle.
    There is a basic difference between the sequence of verb-particles where the verb has an object and where it has none. According to the examples which I have collected, I have found at least three types, which will be described below :
    <표 확인>
    Under Type Two, we find two alternative forms of certain particle sequences. This transformational phenomenon may be referred to as separable and inseparable. An examples which shows this transformational operation is as fellows :
    We look up the words. ↔ We look the words up.
    There are some sequences which allow no transformation of this kind : the noun object never comes before the verbal particle.
    Korean students have great difficulty in learning to use the English verb-particle sequence. Though, unfortunately, no thorough contrastive analysis of Korean and English has been made in regard to the sequence, we know, after a lengthy investigation of the Korean language, that no similar structure exists in Korean. Hence the problem that arises for Korean students learning English. For instance,
    They set out the next day. (3)
    A Korean equivalent of "set out" or "leave" is "choolbal, " but there are no two-word equivalents. Thus the Korean student will have little difficulty in substituting "choolbal" for a single English word ("leave") but he will be quite confused when he discovers or has to produce the two-word alternative ("set out").
    One of the most difficult tasks for non-native speakers in learning English is the verb-particle sequence in contemporary English. They discover the fact that there are certain combinations of verb and particle which bear little or no relatonship to the individual words of which they are composed. The also find out that the sequences do not follow logic in either construction or meaning
    The verb-particle sequence occurs in sufficient numbers and with such consistency of structural patterns as to permit us to formulate rules for its use in English verb phrases. Grammarians, it is true, are not in complete agreement upon the description of these sequences. Many call them verb adverb and verb-pre-position combinations. But for Korean students of English, some classification of these sequences such as we have made, along with certain guides to problems of stress, intonation and word order, is a definite aid in mastering English.
    번역하기

    There are many examples of verb-particle relations in contemporary English. In recent years there has teen an increasing interest in the study of verb-particle sequences. Especially during the last decade or two, remarkable progress has been made in a...

    There are many examples of verb-particle relations in contemporary English. In recent years there has teen an increasing interest in the study of verb-particle sequences. Especially during the last decade or two, remarkable progress has been made in applying techniques of modern linguistic methodology to scientific investigation which focuses on the dynamic aspects of linguistic behavior.
    Previous work has contributed greatly to a fuller understanding of the problems involved in this knotty area of English syntax, and valuable analysis and suggestions have been made toward a satisfactory solution. It may be said, however, that we need a more comprehensive and suitable study on verb-particle relations, particularily for the benefit of Korean students of English, with some explanation based on a constrative analysis between Korean and English.
    The verb-particle sequence is a unique linguistic unit which is used extensively in all forms of communication. The term "particle" has been differently defined by different scholars. I would like to use the word "particles" in a broad sense, for the following reasons: The term particle can easily serve as a cover term for (a) prepositional use, (b) adverbial use, and (c) overlapping or neutral use.
    A verb-particle sequence is, then, a unit consisting of a verb with an added particle or particles, with or without object, which may show, as a whole, a unique meaning which is other than the combined meaning of the parts together.
    There is a structural marker to distinguish one type of verb-particle sequence from another. The marker in the construction consists of "stress and juncture signal" in the verb phrase. This is well demonstrated in the following examples:
    The horse pu´lled down | the hill. (1)
    The horse pu´lled | down the hill. (2)
    In (1) and (2) we note two possible sequences. When two strong stress fall on both pull and down in setence (1) with the possibility of a slight break, we have an indication of verb + adverb sequence, whereas when a strong stress falls on pull and a weaker stress on down in sentence (2), with the possibility of a break between the two, it shows a verb + preposition sequence.
    There are three types of particles in sequences: (1) post-verbal particle, (2) pre-nominal particle and (3) overlapping particle.
    There is a basic difference between the sequence of verb-particles where the verb has an object and where it has none. According to the examples which I have collected, I have found at least three types, which will be described below :
    <표 확인>
    Under Type Two, we find two alternative forms of certain particle sequences. This transformational phenomenon may be referred to as separable and inseparable. An examples which shows this transformational operation is as fellows :
    We look up the words. ↔ We look the words up.
    There are some sequences which allow no transformation of this kind : the noun object never comes before the verbal particle.
    Korean students have great difficulty in learning to use the English verb-particle sequence. Though, unfortunately, no thorough contrastive analysis of Korean and English has been made in regard to the sequence, we know, after a lengthy investigation of the Korean language, that no similar structure exists in Korean. Hence the problem that arises for Korean students learning English. For instance,
    They set out the next day. (3)
    A Korean equivalent of "set out" or "leave" is "choolbal, " but there are no two-word equivalents. Thus the Korean student will have little difficulty in substituting "choolbal" for a single English word ("leave") but he will be quite confused when he discovers or has to produce the two-word alternative ("set out").
    One of the most difficult tasks for non-native speakers in learning English is the verb-particle sequence in contemporary English. They discover the fact that there are certain combinations of verb and particle which bear little or no relatonship to the individual words of which they are composed. The also find out that the sequences do not follow logic in either construction or meaning
    The verb-particle sequence occurs in sufficient numbers and with such consistency of structural patterns as to permit us to formulate rules for its use in English verb phrases. Grammarians, it is true, are not in complete agreement upon the description of these sequences. Many call them verb adverb and verb-pre-position combinations. But for Korean students of English, some classification of these sequences such as we have made, along with certain guides to problems of stress, intonation and word order, is a definite aid in mastering English.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1.序論
    • 2.본론
    • 2.1 學者들의 지금까지 硏究
    • 2.2 動詞群 連語란 問題點
    • 3.動詞群 構造의 分析
    • 1.序論
    • 2.본론
    • 2.1 學者들의 지금까지 硏究
    • 2.2 動詞群 連語란 問題點
    • 3.動詞群 構造의 分析
    • 3.1 動詞群 類型의 史的 考察
    • 3.2 構造變形詞의 役割
    • 3.3 動詞 + 構造變形詞의 內部組織
    • 3.31 動詞群 構造의 內部表象
    • 3.32 動詞群 連結構造 體系
    • 3.4 動詞群 構造 類型
    • 3.41 動詞群 第1 類型
    • 3.411 動詞群 第1 類型 A
    • 3.412 動詞群 第1 類型 B
    • 3.413 動詞群 第1 類型 C
    • 3.42 動詞群 第2 類型
    • 3.421 動詞群 第2 類型 A
    • 3.422 動詞群 第2 類型 B
    • 3.4221 動詞群 第2 類型 Bi
    • 3.4222 動詞群 第2 類型 Bii
    • 3.43 動詞群 第3 類型
    • 3.5 動詞群 位置 變換
    • 4.動詞群의 意味構造
    • 4.1 動詞群 構造意味 變換
    • 4.2 動詞群 構造意味의 多元的 變換
    • 4.21 英語 意味構造意味의 多元性
    • 4.22 英語 構造意味와 韓國語 構造意味와의 相關關係性
    • 5.結論
    • 參考文獻 및 APPENDIX
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼