RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      웹기반 지능형 기술가치평가 시스템에 관한 연구

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Although there have been cases of evaluating the value of specific companies or projects which have centralized on developed countries in North America and Europe from the early 2000s, the system and methodology for estimating the economic value of in...

      Although there have been cases of evaluating the value of specific companies or projects which have centralized on developed countries in North America and Europe from the early 2000s, the system and methodology for estimating the economic value of individual technologies or patents has been activated on and on. Of course, there exist several online systems that qualitatively evaluate the technology’s grade or the patent rating of the technology to be evaluated, as in ‘KTRS’ of the KIBO and ‘SMART 3.1’ of the Korea Invention Promotion Association. However, a web-based technology valuation system, referred to as ‘STAR-Value system’ that calculates the quantitative values of the subject technology for various purposes such as business feasibility analysis, investment attraction, tax/litigation, etc., has been officially opened and recently spreading.
      In this study, we introduce the type of methodology and evaluation model, reference information supporting these theories, and how database associated are utilized, focusing various modules and frameworks embedded in STAR-Value system. In particular, there are six valuation methods, including the discounted cash flow method (DCF), which is a representative one based on the income approach that anticipates future economic income to be valued at present, and the relief-from-royalty method, which calculates the present value of royalties where we consider the contribution of the subject technology towards the business value created as the royalty rate. We look at how models and related support information (technology life, corporate (business) financial information, discount rate, industrial technology factors, etc.) can be used and linked in a intelligent manner.
      Based on the classification of information such as International Patent Classification (IPC) or Korea Standard Industry Classification (KSIC) for technology to be evaluated, the STAR-Value system automatically returns meta data such as technology cycle time (TCT), sales growth rate and profitability data of similar company or industry sector, weighted average cost of capital (WACC), indices of industrial technology factors, etc., and apply adjustment factors to them, so that the result of technology value calculation has high reliability and objectivity. Furthermore, if the information on the potential market size of the target technology and the market share of the commercialization subject refers to data-driven information, or if the estimated value range of similar technologies by industry sector is provided from the evaluation cases which are already completed and accumulated in database, the STAR-Value is anticipated that it will enable to present highly accurate value range in real time by intelligently linking various support modules.
      Including the explanation of the various valuation models and relevant primary variables as presented in this paper, the STAR-Value system intends to utilize more systematically and in a data-driven way by supporting the optimal model selection guideline module, intelligent technology value range reasoning module, and similar company selection based market share prediction module, etc. In addition, the research on the development and intelligence of the web-based STAR-Value system is significant in that it widely spread the web-based system that can be used in the validation and application to practices of the theoretical feasibility of the technology valuation field, and it is expected that it could be utilized in various fields of technology commercialization.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 성태응, "특허가치 결정요인과 기술거래금액에 관한 실증 분석" 한국기술혁신학회 19 (19): 254-279, 2016

      2 박현우, "초기단계 기술의 가치평가 방법론 적용 프레임워크" 한국기술혁신학회 15 (15): 242-261, 2012

      3 임성묵, "시장접근법 기반의 기술가치평가를 위한 개념적 모형에 관한 연구" 한국기술혁신학회 18 (18): 204-231, 2015

      4 전승표, "생존곡선을 활용한 잔존 인용특허 수명 추정에 관한 연구" 한국기술혁신학회 15 (15): 745-765, 2012

      5 김상국, "농식품 산업의 기술평가 영향요인 분석과 시뮬레이션 기반 기술평가 비교" 기술경영경제학회 24 (24): 277-307, 2016

      6 강필성, "기술가치평가를 위한 시장대체원가 접근법" 대한산업공학회 41 (41): 150-161, 2015

      7 전승표, "기대주기 분석을 활용한 수요예측 연구: 하이브리드 자동차의 사례를 중심으로" 한국기술혁신학회 14 : 1232-1255, 2011

      8 "http://www.starvalue.or.kr/"

      9 "http://ip.com/solutions/innovationq/"

      10 Sung, T.-E., "Web-based STAR-Value System for Technology Valuation" 319-337, 2016

      1 성태응, "특허가치 결정요인과 기술거래금액에 관한 실증 분석" 한국기술혁신학회 19 (19): 254-279, 2016

      2 박현우, "초기단계 기술의 가치평가 방법론 적용 프레임워크" 한국기술혁신학회 15 (15): 242-261, 2012

      3 임성묵, "시장접근법 기반의 기술가치평가를 위한 개념적 모형에 관한 연구" 한국기술혁신학회 18 (18): 204-231, 2015

      4 전승표, "생존곡선을 활용한 잔존 인용특허 수명 추정에 관한 연구" 한국기술혁신학회 15 (15): 745-765, 2012

      5 김상국, "농식품 산업의 기술평가 영향요인 분석과 시뮬레이션 기반 기술평가 비교" 기술경영경제학회 24 (24): 277-307, 2016

      6 강필성, "기술가치평가를 위한 시장대체원가 접근법" 대한산업공학회 41 (41): 150-161, 2015

      7 전승표, "기대주기 분석을 활용한 수요예측 연구: 하이브리드 자동차의 사례를 중심으로" 한국기술혁신학회 14 : 1232-1255, 2011

      8 "http://www.starvalue.or.kr/"

      9 "http://ip.com/solutions/innovationq/"

      10 Sung, T.-E., "Web-based STAR-Value System for Technology Valuation" 319-337, 2016

      11 Reilly, R. F., "Valuing Intangible Assets" McGraw-Hill 1998

      12 Smith, G. V., "Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets" John Wiley & Sons 2000

      13 Yang, D. W., "Valuation for technology on the practical viewpoint" 3 : 68-84, 2000

      14 Seol, S. S., "Theories and Practices of Technology Valuation" 3 (3): 1-4, 2000

      15 Tseng, Y.-H., "Text mining techniques for patent analysis" 43 : 1216-1247, 2007

      16 Yoon, M. H., "Technology Valuation System of Owned Technologies" 11 (11): 35-43, 2001

      17 "Technology Valuation Service by Tiger Scientific Inc"

      18 Hong, G. . P., "Technology Valuation Model for Effective R&D Investment Decision-making" KISTI 2002

      19 Kim, S.-G., "Remodulation Studies on Technology Valuation Models through Elaboration of Profit Volatility Analysis Models" 151-162, 2013

      20 Heo, E. N., "Recent developments on economic valuation method: CVA MAUA and real option pricing" 3 : 37-54, 2000

      21 Reinhard, H., "Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development" 36 (36): 387-398, 2007

      22 "OceanTomo Ratings System Data Access and Report Pricing"

      23 Jun, S.-P., "Forecasting by analogy using the web search traffic" 115 : 37-51, 2016

      24 Baek, D. H., "Development of Technology Valuation System for Promoting Technology Transfer" 277-286, 2003

      25 Shin, K. S., "Development of Company Credit Assessment System by Intelligent Information Technology" 67-74, 2000

      26 박현우, "Determinants and Influential Factors in Technology Valuation in Korea" 한국콘텐츠학회 6 (6): 53-58, 2010

      27 Park, H.-W., "Comparative Studies on Application Methodologies of Income Approach in Technology Valuation" 129-144, 2012

      28 Kwon, Y., "Assessment of online patent rating system in Korea" 19 : 164-167, 2013

      29 Crowsey, M. J., "An Evaluation of Unstructured Text Mining Software" IEEE 1-6, 2007

      30 Yang, T. S, "A Study on the Improvement of the Existing Technology Valuation Solutions;focused on high technology based start-up company" 2 (2): 93-120, 2000

      31 Kang, N. G., "A Study on Methodology of Establishing Meta Data about Technology Valuation Information" 327-330, 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-03-25 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Intelligent Information Systems Society KCI등재
      2015-03-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-02-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국지능정보시스템학회 논문지 -> 지능정보연구 KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.51 1.51 1.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.78 1.54 2.674 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼