북한 지역내 인도에 반한 죄의 법률적 처리에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The United Nations Commission of Inquiry on the Human Rights in the DPRK, in its 2014 report, has manifested that the crimes against humanities have been committed and have not ceased to occur to the present time in the territory of the DPRK. The Commission has also clarified that not only the individual perpetrators, up to the “Supreme Leader”, in the command chain of the state policy, but the whole governance system in the country have resulted in the perpetration of those atrocities.
The Commission also pointed out that, despite the need to engage with the DPRK on the human rights dialogue, the importance of the accountability should not be compromised at all. It looked into the possibilities of holding various forms of international accountability systems, such as the International Criminal Court, ad hoc and mixed tribunals, and national trials that may operate based upon the principle of universality. It also mentioned the possibility of holding “truth and reconciliation commissions”, while specifically pointing that accountability should be pursued at all costs.
This writing contends that the most desirable legal forum in the pursuit of the accountability are the domestic courts of South Korea, It also points out that in order for a Korean court to be placed as the best venue for the settlement of the crimes against humanities in the DPRK, the following issues, at the minimum, should be duly considered prior to the opening of such domestic courts: the composition of the court; the jurisdiction-time, place, and conducts; the applicable norms; and the application of the statutes of limitations.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
• Ⅱ. 북한내 인도에 반한 죄에 관한 유엔의 입장
• Ⅲ. 북한내 인도에 반한 죄에 관한 형사책임의 처리
• Ⅳ. 나가는 말
• 【참고문헌】
• 【Abstract】

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이규창, "북한인권 침해행위에 대한 국제형사처벌 - 유엔 북한인권 조사위원회 보고서와 관련하여 -" 국가안전보장문제연구소 57 (57): 57-85, 2014

2 한명섭, "북한 과거청산과 북한인권기록보존소 설치에 관한 고찰" (18) : 2014

3 힐디군트 노이베르트, "복권과 배상, 독재정권의 희생자들을 위한 복지정책, 독일통일과정에서의 과거사 청산과 사회통합: 남북 통일과정에 주는 시사점" 법무부․콘라드 아네나워 재단 2013

4 김형구, "레바논특별재판소의 설립과 관련 법적 쟁점" 대한국제법학회 53 (53): 11-40, 2008

5 안명철, "그들이 울고 있다" 천지미디어 1995

6 "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimes_against_humanity"

7 "http://www.un.org/en/sc/about/methods/arriaformula.shtml"

8 "http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/StatuteInternationalC riminalTribunalForRwanda.aspx"

9 "http://www.icty.org/x/file/Legal%20Library/Statute/statute_sept09_en.pdf"

10 "What is Transitional Justice?:A Backgrounder, UN Peace-building"

11 "UN. Doc. A/RES/70/172"

12 "UN Doc., A/RES/69/188"

13 "UN Doc., A/HRC/RES/25/25"

14 "UN Doc., A/HRC/28/71"

15 "UN Doc., A/HRC/26/43"

16 "UN Doc., A/HRC/25/CPR.1, para. 1026"

17 "UN Doc., A/HRC/25/63"

18 "UN Doc., A/HRC/22/57"

19 "UN Doc., A/C.3/70/L.35"

20 "UN Doc., A/70/362"

21 Paige Arthur, How, "Transitions" Human Rights Quarterly 31 : 321-, 2009

22 "The Prosecutor vs Jean-Paul Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T"

23 Tricia D. Olsen, "The Justice Balance: When Transitional Justice Improves Human Rights" 32 : 982-, 2010

24 백범석, "Something to Consider: For Transitional Justice in Unified Korea" 대한국제법학회 60 (60): 99-130, 2015

25 "Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, A/CONF"

26 "Report Presented to the Preliminary Peace Conference by the Commission on the Responsibilities of the Authors of War and on Enforcement of Penalties" 1919

27 Malcolm N. Shaw, "International Law" Cambridge University Press 2008

28 "Guidance Note of the Secretary-General, United Nations Approach to Transitional Justice"

29 Major Nathaniel H. Babb, "Don’t Forget the Far East: A Modern Lesson from the Chinese Prosecution of Japanese War Criminals After World War II" 222 (222): 155-, 2014

30 Hogan Lovells International LLP., "Crimes Against Humanity: An Independent Legal Opinion On the Findings of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic Peoples’ Republic of Korea 2014" 2014

31 Steven R. Ratner, "Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy" Oxford University Press 2001

32 Juan Carlos Portilla, "A Forgiveness Law: The Path to Solve the Peace versus Justice Dilemma" 35 : 193-, 2015