RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      전자간호기록 적용 전ㆍ후 환자의 간호기록 비교: 복식자궁절제술 환자를 중심으로 = A Comparison of the Nursing Records of Hysterectomy Patients: Pre and Post Implementation of an ICNP Based Electronic Nursing Record System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101593665

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: This study compared the abilities of electronic nursing records, which are based on standard nursing terminology, and paper-based nursing records to support the nursing process. Methods: The nursing records of 38 pairs of inpatients admitted to a gynecology nursing unit were selected. The data from the paper records were obtained manually by a chart review as single statement units. The electronic records were extracted from a computerized system. The statements were categorized using the NANDA diagnosis and the modified Clinical Care Classification. Based on a semantic analysis of the components of the nursing process, the completeness of the nursing records was classified into complete and incomplete patterns according to the presence and relevancy of the assessment, the diagnosis, the intervention and the outcome. Results: The numbers of nursing diagnoses used and the unique nursing diagnoses were both higher in the electronic records than those in the paper records. The number of statements of nursing assessments/outcomes, and nursing interventions was 1.4-fold higher in the electronic records than that in the paper records respectively. The proportion of complete patterns of the nursing process was 3.4% in the paper records and 25.7% in the electronic records. Conclusion: These results suggest that electronic records are better than paper records to support the nursing process in terms of the quantitative and qualitative aspects of nursing documentation.
      번역하기

      Objective: This study compared the abilities of electronic nursing records, which are based on standard nursing terminology, and paper-based nursing records to support the nursing process. Methods: The nursing records of 38 pairs of inpatients admitte...

      Objective: This study compared the abilities of electronic nursing records, which are based on standard nursing terminology, and paper-based nursing records to support the nursing process. Methods: The nursing records of 38 pairs of inpatients admitted to a gynecology nursing unit were selected. The data from the paper records were obtained manually by a chart review as single statement units. The electronic records were extracted from a computerized system. The statements were categorized using the NANDA diagnosis and the modified Clinical Care Classification. Based on a semantic analysis of the components of the nursing process, the completeness of the nursing records was classified into complete and incomplete patterns according to the presence and relevancy of the assessment, the diagnosis, the intervention and the outcome. Results: The numbers of nursing diagnoses used and the unique nursing diagnoses were both higher in the electronic records than those in the paper records. The number of statements of nursing assessments/outcomes, and nursing interventions was 1.4-fold higher in the electronic records than that in the paper records respectively. The proportion of complete patterns of the nursing process was 3.4% in the paper records and 25.7% in the electronic records. Conclusion: These results suggest that electronic records are better than paper records to support the nursing process in terms of the quantitative and qualitative aspects of nursing documentation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Lee KH, "Women's Health Nursing I, II" Hyunmoon Press 1342-1358, 2003

      2 Nursing Text Society for the Research of Women's Health, "Women's Health Nursing I, II" Soomoonsa 1108-1120, 2006

      3 ICN, "The 7-axis model of version 1(chap 4)"

      4 Hardiker NR, "Standards for nursing terminology" 7 (7): 523-528, 2000

      5 Bakken S, "Standardized terminologies for nursing concepts: collaborative activities in the United States" International Medical Informatics Association 21-32, 2000

      6 American Nursing Association, "Nursing informatics: Scope and standards of practice" Silver Spring 1-15, 2008

      7 Park HA, "Nursing diagnosis, intervention, outcome classification" Seoul National University Press 5-24, 2000

      8 Carpenito-Moyet LJ, "Nursing care plans and documentation. 4th ed" Williams & Wilkins 3-26, 2004

      9 North America Nursing Diagnosis Association, "Nursing Diagnosis: Definition and Classifications 2001-2002" 13-207, 2001

      10 Carpenito-Moyet LJ, "Nursing Diagnosis. Application to clinical practice. 10th ed" Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 80-938, 2004

      1 Lee KH, "Women's Health Nursing I, II" Hyunmoon Press 1342-1358, 2003

      2 Nursing Text Society for the Research of Women's Health, "Women's Health Nursing I, II" Soomoonsa 1108-1120, 2006

      3 ICN, "The 7-axis model of version 1(chap 4)"

      4 Hardiker NR, "Standards for nursing terminology" 7 (7): 523-528, 2000

      5 Bakken S, "Standardized terminologies for nursing concepts: collaborative activities in the United States" International Medical Informatics Association 21-32, 2000

      6 American Nursing Association, "Nursing informatics: Scope and standards of practice" Silver Spring 1-15, 2008

      7 Park HA, "Nursing diagnosis, intervention, outcome classification" Seoul National University Press 5-24, 2000

      8 Carpenito-Moyet LJ, "Nursing care plans and documentation. 4th ed" Williams & Wilkins 3-26, 2004

      9 North America Nursing Diagnosis Association, "Nursing Diagnosis: Definition and Classifications 2001-2002" 13-207, 2001

      10 Carpenito-Moyet LJ, "Nursing Diagnosis. Application to clinical practice. 10th ed" Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 80-938, 2004

      11 Seoul National University Hospital, "Nursing Diagnosis and Planning" Seoul National University Press 335-350, 1994

      12 Nahm R, "Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction" 18 (18): 220-229, 2000

      13 Gabrieli ER, "Longitudinal electronic patient records: a challenge of our time" 15 (15): S48-S52, 1997

      14 조인숙, "ICNP 활용 전자간호기록 시스템을 위한 수작업 간호기록내용 분석: 모성간호기록을 중심으로" 대한의료정보학회 8 (8): 1-13, 2002

      15 Hardiker NR, "Formal nursing terminology systems: a means to an end" 35 (35): 298-305, 2002

      16 Cho I, "Evaluation of the expressiveness of an ICNP-based nursing data dictionary in a computerized nursing record system" 13 (13): 456-464, 2006

      17 Larrabee JH, "Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital" 19 (19): 56-68, 2001

      18 Smith K, "Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation" 23 (23): 132-138, 2005

      19 Park HA, "Development of nursing information system component and interface model for integrated medical information system" Ministry of Health and Welfare 31-66, 2003

      20 Park SA, "Development of computerized program for nursing diagnosis and Intervention linked to medical diagnosis" 8 (8): 239-248, 2002

      21 Cho I, "Development and evaluation of a terminology-based electronic nursing record system" 36 (36): 304-312, 2003

      22 Song MS, "Comparison of nusing activities reflected in nursing notes and in-depth interviews of nurses in an acute hospital" 33 (33): 802-811, 2003

      23 Seoul National University Hospital, "Clinical nursing process application as based on ENR" Hyunmoon Press 33-884, 2007

      24 Saba V, "Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System Manual" Springer Publishing Company 103-240, 2007

      25 Marin HF, "Building standard-based nursing information systems. Pan American Health Organization" World Health Organization 12-15, 2001

      26 Kim YJ, "Analysis of nursing records of cardiac-surgery patients based on the nursing process and focusing on nursing outcomes" 74 (74): 952-959, 2003

      27 Myung HJ, "Analysis of nursing notes to develop an ICNP-based electronic nursing records system-Focused on general surgery patients' nursing records" Seoul National University 2003

      28 Lee CH, "A study on the effects of EMR on nursing documentation" 6 (6): 87-97, 2000

      29 Chi SA, "A basic study on improvement and computerization of nursing record" 29 (29): 21-33, 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-04-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한의료정보학회지 -> Healthcare Informatics Research
      외국어명 : Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics -> Healthcare Informatics Research
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.24 0.24 0.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.18 0.15 0.434 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼