『BulgyoJinhunghoiWolbo』 No.4, No.6, No.8, and No.9 reveal a section of the controversy over zen doctrine developed in the history of Zen Buddhism in Korea. Yu-gyeongjong's 「Dapseo(答書)」, which is included in No. 4, shows the problems of per...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108554065
김호귀 (동국대학교)
2023
Korean
불교진흥회월보 ; 유경종 ; 이능화 ; 최동식 ; 영명연수 ; 임제종 ; BulgyoJinhunghoiWolbo ; Dapseo ; Linjizong ; Yi-nunghwa ; Choi-dongsik ; Yu-gyeongjong ; Hangaldung
KCI등재
학술저널
69-99(31쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
『BulgyoJinhunghoiWolbo』 No.4, No.6, No.8, and No.9 reveal a section of the controversy over zen doctrine developed in the history of Zen Buddhism in Korea. Yu-gyeongjong's 「Dapseo(答書)」, which is included in No. 4, shows the problems of per...
『BulgyoJinhunghoiWolbo』 No.4, No.6, No.8, and No.9 reveal a section of the controversy over zen doctrine developed in the history of Zen Buddhism in Korea.
Yu-gyeongjong's 「Dapseo(答書)」, which is included in No. 4, shows the problems of performance and edification related to Linjizong, and the characteristics of Joseon zen buddhism related to five-sects of zen buddhism.
On the other hand, the sixth issue shows Yi-nunghwa and Choi-dongsik's refutation. Yi-nunghwa, on six occasions, and Choi-dongsik, on five occasions, raised objections to Yu-gyeongjong's views. Choi-dongsik's and Yi-nunghwa's rebuttals to Yu-gyeongjong's 「Dapseo」 were developed to the same effect, but they are not entirely identical, and there are subtle differences in the content of these rebuttals.
Regarding the views of these refutations, Yu-gyeongjong again described his views with the title of penance in No. 8. Yu-gyeongjong concludes that after describing his views in various ways, including doctrinal explanations and practices of reality, this way of explanation gradually increases conflicts.
In particular, Yu-gyeongjong contributed 「Hangaldung(閑葛藤)」 to No.9. Here, Yu-gyeongjong ended up advocating his own view in the form of a dialogue about the practice of Chosun zen Buddhism, which inherited Linjizong, and other ways of ruling the mind, rather than reflecting on the refutation of Choi-dongsik and Yi-nunghwa.
『BulgyoJinhunghoiWolbo』 showed the uniqueness of being a magazine of modern Korean Buddhism, and it was also a newsletter of the Buddhist end at that time, a medium of propagation, and a scholarly magazine of Buddhism and a magazine of culture.
It can be seen that the development of the doctrinal debate shown here was actively spreading in the doctrinal aspect in modern Korean zen Buddhism.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 정병삼, "예운의 근대 불교계 활동" 불교문화연구원 (96) : 89-120, 2021
2 "역주 조선불교통사" 동국대출판부 2010
3 김종진, "근대불교잡지의 문화사" 소명출판 2022
4 李能和, "朝鮮佛教通史" 신문관 1917
5 대한불교조계종교육원, "曹溪宗史" 조계종출판사 2004
6 鈴木哲雄, "唐五代禪宗史" 山喜房佛書林 1997
7 "『불교진흥회월보』 제1호 · 제4호 · 제6호 · 제8호 · 제9호"
8 念常, "『佛祖歷代通載』, 大正藏49"
9 서수정, "19세기 후반 결사단체의 佛書 編刊 배경" 한국불교사학회 한국불교사연구소 (11) : 298-330, 2017
1 정병삼, "예운의 근대 불교계 활동" 불교문화연구원 (96) : 89-120, 2021
2 "역주 조선불교통사" 동국대출판부 2010
3 김종진, "근대불교잡지의 문화사" 소명출판 2022
4 李能和, "朝鮮佛教通史" 신문관 1917
5 대한불교조계종교육원, "曹溪宗史" 조계종출판사 2004
6 鈴木哲雄, "唐五代禪宗史" 山喜房佛書林 1997
7 "『불교진흥회월보』 제1호 · 제4호 · 제6호 · 제8호 · 제9호"
8 念常, "『佛祖歷代通載』, 大正藏49"
9 서수정, "19세기 후반 결사단체의 佛書 編刊 배경" 한국불교사학회 한국불교사연구소 (11) : 298-330, 2017
스리랑카 탈팟(Talpat) 전통과 필사본 연구(1) - Dīpavaṃsa Catalog와 Colophon을 중심으로 -
초의 의순의 이종선과 다선일미의 상관성 고찰 - 『선문사변만어』와 『동다송』을 통해 -
백파와 초의의 선사상 논쟁 재검토 –삼종선과 이종선을 중심으로