RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    러시아의 동북아정책과 안보협력의 제도화 = Russia's Security Policy for the Instituitionalization in Northeast Asia

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103964933

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The foreign policy of Russia traditi onally unfolded in two distinct theaters, the European and the Asian. But the primary attention and effort were directed to Europe,
    the significance of the Asian theater being remained on the whole subordinate, the results of which was the failure at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning
    of the twentieth and the relative trengthening of the America’s shadow during the Cold War. It was ironically after the demise of the Soviet Empire that Asia, which was seen as having its proper value and appreciated not
    from the comparative point of view with rope, revived in Russian foreign policy. Though
    without success, Gorbachev promoted a series of policies for multilateral security cooperation toward Northeast Asia. And Yeltsin and Putin respectively took concrete
    forms of this sort of policies in the course of building their own military strategy and diplomatic doctrines. Recently Russia is making efforts to identify herself with a broker or a guarantor for the Northeast Asian multilateral security system, which is seen improbable to be established for the time
    being because of the poverty of historical experience, the uniqueness of the Northeast Asian regional international system and
    nonexistence of common or collective
    security issues. Hope is not policy, and Russian foreign policy makers knows this very well. For the predictable future, herefore, they will search for the bilateral
    security partnership with each Northeast Asian countries, at least until the completion of their military reformation policy.
    번역하기

    The foreign policy of Russia traditi onally unfolded in two distinct theaters, the European and the Asian. But the primary attention and effort were directed to Europe, the significance of the Asian theater being remained on the whole subordinate, the...

    The foreign policy of Russia traditi onally unfolded in two distinct theaters, the European and the Asian. But the primary attention and effort were directed to Europe,
    the significance of the Asian theater being remained on the whole subordinate, the results of which was the failure at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning
    of the twentieth and the relative trengthening of the America’s shadow during the Cold War. It was ironically after the demise of the Soviet Empire that Asia, which was seen as having its proper value and appreciated not
    from the comparative point of view with rope, revived in Russian foreign policy. Though
    without success, Gorbachev promoted a series of policies for multilateral security cooperation toward Northeast Asia. And Yeltsin and Putin respectively took concrete
    forms of this sort of policies in the course of building their own military strategy and diplomatic doctrines. Recently Russia is making efforts to identify herself with a broker or a guarantor for the Northeast Asian multilateral security system, which is seen improbable to be established for the time
    being because of the poverty of historical experience, the uniqueness of the Northeast Asian regional international system and
    nonexistence of common or collective
    security issues. Hope is not policy, and Russian foreign policy makers knows this very well. For the predictable future, herefore, they will search for the bilateral
    security partnership with each Northeast Asian countries, at least until the completion of their military reformation policy.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-07-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea and World Politics KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.92 0.92 0.91
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.88 0.95 1.328 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼