This article is to study on the background and motives of China’s new security strategy. Furthermore, this study intends to find distinctive features which are involved in the new security strategy of Great China established in the 21st century’s...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103964932
김재관 (서강대 공공정책대학원 중국학과)
2003
Korean
KCI등재후보
학술저널
1-34(34쪽)
11
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This article is to study on the background and motives of China’s new security strategy. Furthermore, this study intends to find distinctive features which are involved in the new security strategy of Great China established in the 21st century’s...
This article is to study on the background and motives of China’s new security strategy.
Furthermore, this study intends to find distinctive features which are involved in the new security strategy of Great China established in the 21st century’s new international environment.In short, the ollowing five issues will be dealt with in this
study. First, China is moving from the resent economic development-centered diplomatic policy to the balanced development strategy
in order to enhance its military powers as well as economic one, which means that the theory of security and development starts
to gain its momentum. Second, the following three factors are gradually accelerating China’s modernization of national defense: US Missile Defense System, Taiwan’s
increasing sentiment of independence, and Japan’s rearmament. However, the military power of China has not reached the level of
‘China Threat’ as the US has been worried so far. Third, China’s new concept of national security will function as a basic policy of security for the 21st century. Fourth,
China will pursue the multi-polarization
strategy and independent cooperation line including multilateralism and diplomatic policy
of partnership & linkage against the selective congagement policy of America, in the 21st century. Finally, the study is to demonstrate that the stability and peace
of the Northeast Asia will be guaranteed
only when the US-China relation is based on the strategic partnership, rather than potentially strategic antagonism.
동티모르 재식민지화와 독립: 서방권 국가들의 구성주의적 행위를 중심으로
한국 대통령 선거에서 제3후보에 대한 지지 분석:정주영과 이인제의 비교 연구
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-07-08 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea and World Politics | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 1999-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.91 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.88 | 0.95 | 1.328 | 0.24 |