RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대통령의 리더십과 정부신뢰: 노무현 대통령 사례를 중심으로 = Presidential Leadership and Government Trust: The Case of President Roh Moo-hyun

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103963845

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The decline in government trust is now a worldwide phenomenon.
    Government trust is essential for the effective operation of democratic political systems, since democratic governments cannot successfully implement their policies without popular support. Government trust in the United States, which had steadily decreased since the 1960s, surged during the Reagan and Clinton administrations. It turns out that presidential image, and a president’s persona in particular, has contributed to the increase in government trust in America. This study attempts to analyze South Korean survey data in order to determine the relationship between presidential leadership and government trust and thereby generalize a theory in this field.
    In the result, it was found that there exists a relationship between presidential leadership and government trust among South Korean electorates as well. The differences between the United States and South Korea are also observed.
    In the case of President Roh of South Korea, presidential persona was not so important as in the cases of the American presidents.
    Rather, rational components, in the form of evaluations of presidential competency and policy on the bases of unification, diplomacy, and economy, were discovered to be much more important in raising government trust. It was also found that the results, seemingly, could be correlated with the stage of a presidency. The present survey was conducted during the early stage of President Roh’s term, and the same pattern of results also appeared for the early stage of President Clinton’s term. As President Clinton’s term passed, presidential persona, as compared with job evaluation, became much more influential on government trust. In fact, it is widely known that the decline of government trust is responsible for the short-term failure of the real estate policy of the current Roh administration, which implies that a president’s personal image might be related to government trust in South Korea as much as it is in the United States.
    번역하기

    The decline in government trust is now a worldwide phenomenon. Government trust is essential for the effective operation of democratic political systems, since democratic governments cannot successfully implement their policies without popular support...

    The decline in government trust is now a worldwide phenomenon.
    Government trust is essential for the effective operation of democratic political systems, since democratic governments cannot successfully implement their policies without popular support. Government trust in the United States, which had steadily decreased since the 1960s, surged during the Reagan and Clinton administrations. It turns out that presidential image, and a president’s persona in particular, has contributed to the increase in government trust in America. This study attempts to analyze South Korean survey data in order to determine the relationship between presidential leadership and government trust and thereby generalize a theory in this field.
    In the result, it was found that there exists a relationship between presidential leadership and government trust among South Korean electorates as well. The differences between the United States and South Korea are also observed.
    In the case of President Roh of South Korea, presidential persona was not so important as in the cases of the American presidents.
    Rather, rational components, in the form of evaluations of presidential competency and policy on the bases of unification, diplomacy, and economy, were discovered to be much more important in raising government trust. It was also found that the results, seemingly, could be correlated with the stage of a presidency. The present survey was conducted during the early stage of President Roh’s term, and the same pattern of results also appeared for the early stage of President Clinton’s term. As President Clinton’s term passed, presidential persona, as compared with job evaluation, became much more influential on government trust. In fact, it is widely known that the decline of government trust is responsible for the short-term failure of the real estate policy of the current Roh administration, which implies that a president’s personal image might be related to government trust in South Korea as much as it is in the United States.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "행정신뢰의 결정요인에 관한 경험적 연구" 11 (11): 775-794, 1999

    2 "한국사회에 나타난 악순환의 사이클: 결사체참여, 사회자본, 그리고 정부신뢰" 36 (36): 87-112, 2002

    3 "한국 정치리더십의 특성: 박정희, 김영삼, 김대중: 지사정치형 리더십의 공통점과 차이점" 서울: 한울 2003

    4 "집권전기 이승만 대통령의 정치리더십 연구 ‘카리스마적’권위의 정치적 성격과 전개과정" 22 (22): 217-253, 2000

    5 "정부의 신뢰성 제고와 NGO의 역할" 14 (14): 239-265, 2004

    6 "정부의 신뢰 위기와 NGO와의 파트너십 대안" 12 (12): 186-210, 2003

    7 "정부신뢰 수준의 측정과 비교에 관한 연구" 11 (11): 113-135, 2002

    8 "전두환 리더십, 노태우 처세술" 서울: 너와나 미디어 2002

    9 "잃어버린 은총: 정부에 대한 국민의 상실" 서울: 굿인포메이션 119-166, 2001

    10 "우리도 좋은 대통령을 갖고 싶다: 8명의 역대 대통령과 외국 대통령의 비교 평가" 서울: 사람과 책 2004

    1 "행정신뢰의 결정요인에 관한 경험적 연구" 11 (11): 775-794, 1999

    2 "한국사회에 나타난 악순환의 사이클: 결사체참여, 사회자본, 그리고 정부신뢰" 36 (36): 87-112, 2002

    3 "한국 정치리더십의 특성: 박정희, 김영삼, 김대중: 지사정치형 리더십의 공통점과 차이점" 서울: 한울 2003

    4 "집권전기 이승만 대통령의 정치리더십 연구 ‘카리스마적’권위의 정치적 성격과 전개과정" 22 (22): 217-253, 2000

    5 "정부의 신뢰성 제고와 NGO의 역할" 14 (14): 239-265, 2004

    6 "정부의 신뢰 위기와 NGO와의 파트너십 대안" 12 (12): 186-210, 2003

    7 "정부신뢰 수준의 측정과 비교에 관한 연구" 11 (11): 113-135, 2002

    8 "전두환 리더십, 노태우 처세술" 서울: 너와나 미디어 2002

    9 "잃어버린 은총: 정부에 대한 국민의 상실" 서울: 굿인포메이션 119-166, 2001

    10 "우리도 좋은 대통령을 갖고 싶다: 8명의 역대 대통령과 외국 대통령의 비교 평가" 서울: 사람과 책 2004

    11 "우리나라 정부신뢰 특성 및 영향요인분석" 37 (37): 45-66, 2003

    12 "여론조사 한겨레신문(3월 20일)" 1998

    13 "신뢰의 측정 실험과 설문조사의 차이" 38 (38): 95-116, 2004

    14 "신뢰의 구조 서양의 비교" 서울: 교육과학사 2001

    15 "대통령리더십" 서울: 나남출판 2003

    16 "김영삼정부의 성공과 실패" 서울: 나남출판 2001

    17 "국민의 행정 신뢰에 관한 영향요인 분석 공무원에 대한 신뢰를 중심으로" 33 (33): 37-56, 1999

    18 "국민은 왜 정부를 믿지 않는가" 서울: 굿인포메이션 2001

    19 "국민들의 신뢰와 일본 민주주의" 서울: 굿인포메이션 351-372, 2001

    20 "경제가 정말 문제란 말인가" 서울: 굿인포메이션 169-196, 2001

    21 "“정책산출이 정부신뢰에 주는 영향" 291-305, 1991

    22 "“정부불신의 의미" ” 『한국정치학보』 26 1호 : 57-84, 1992

    23 "“정부불신의 원인과 결과" 393-427,

    24 "“대통령의 리더십과 정부신뢰 레이건과 클린턴대통령의 경험적 비교연구”."

    25 "“경제적 상황요인이 정부신뢰에 미치는 영향" 61-84, 1994

    26 "“The Development of Systemic Support in Four Western Democracies" 32-65,

    27 "Trust, Well-being and Democracy" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999

    28 "Trust, Political Trust and Non-institutionalized Political Participation in Western Europe" 22 (22): 150-171, 1999

    29 "Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluations of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies" 59 (59): 418-451, 1997

    30 "Trust in The Administrative State" 57 (57): 454-460, 1996

    31 "Trust in Large Organizations" 87 (87): 333-338, 1997

    32 "Trust and Governance" New York: Russell Sage Foundation 1998

    33 "Trust and Democratic Governance" New York: Russell Sage Foundation 269-294, 1998

    34 "Trends: Devolution and Confidence in Government" 65 (65): 369-388, 2001

    35 "Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory Journal of Management 17" 643-663,

    36 "The Rhetoric of Presidential Approval: Media Polling and the White House Intern Scandal" Westport: Praeger 2003

    37 "The Political Relevance of Trust in Government" 973-988,

    38 "The Political Relevance of Political Trust" 92 (92): 791-808, 1998

    39 "The Political Image Management Dynamics of President Bill Clinton" Westport: Praeger 2003

    40 "The Myth of the Great Communicator visited on May 7" (vember/december) : 0161987-, 2006

    41 "The Lewinsky Affair and Popular Support for President Clinton" 2006

    42 "The Dynamics of Political Support for American Presidents among Occupational and Partisan Groups America Journal of Political Science 26" 312-332, douglasㆍdouglasrivers&nicholasvasukatis.1982

    43 "Social and Unsocial Capital: A review essay of Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work" 24 : 45-55, 1996

    44 "Social and Political Trust in Established Democracies" Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999

    45 "Presidential Leadership and the Resurgence of Trust in Government British Journal of Political Science 16" 431-453,

    46 "Popular Evaluations of Government an empirical assessment in Cleveland" 61-72,

    47 "Political Parties and Confidence in Government A Comparison of Norway British Journal of Political Science 20" 357-386,

    48 "Political Issues and Trust in Government" 951-72, 1964-1970

    49 "Political Discontent or Ritualism" 989-1001,

    50 "On the Meaning of Political Support" 1561-1595,

    51 "Officials' Misconduct and Public Distrust: Japan and the Trilateral Democracies" Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 173-202, 2000

    52 "Monica Lewinsky's Contribution to Political Science" 31 (31): 182-189, 1998

    53 "Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital" 41 (41): 999-1023, 1997

    54 "Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy" 24 (24): 1119-1132, 1996

    55 "Forgiving and Forgetting: Public Support for Bill Clinton during the Lewinsky Scandal" 32 (32): 554-557, 1999

    56 "Distrust of Government: Explaining American Exceptionalism" Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 74-100, 2000

    57 "Democracy, Leadership and Political Culuture in Korea: With specific focus on political efficacy and trust" 8 (8): 137-170, 2002

    58 "Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture, or Performance?" Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press) 52-73, 2000

    59 "Clinton's Impeachment Will Have Few Consequences for the Presidency (in Symposium: Scandal and Government: Current and Future Implications of the Clinton Presidency)" 32 (32): 541-545, 1999

    60 "Choices and Echoes in Presidential Politics University of Chicago Press"

    61 "An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust" 20 (20): 709-734, 1995

    62 "A System Analysis of Political Life"

    63 "A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support British Journal of Political Science 5" 435-457,

    64 "A Dynamic Model of Presidential Popularity" 334-358,

    65 "A Cross-Society Study of Trust and Reciprocity: Korea, Japan and the US" 3 (3): 31-43, 2000

    66 ": What's Troubling the Trilateral Democracies?" Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 3-27, 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-07-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea and World Politics KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.92 0.92 0.91
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.88 0.95 1.328 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼