RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    민간투자사업의 수익구조의 문제점과 입법적 개선방안 = Study on a Private Investment Recovery Structure in the Private Finance Initiative Projects

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99609438

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Article 1 of the “Act on Private Participation in Infrastructure of Korea” states that the Act aims at contributing to the development of national economy by promoting private investments in public infrastructure in order to establish and operate more creative and effective infrastructure. In order to meet this goal it is an essential prerequisite to legally establish a project structure which ensures some appropriate returns to the private sector participating private investment projects. The main focus of this research paper is to review some relevant provisions of the Act to find out whether such provisions can provide some adequate returns as well as profits to private concessionaires in the private sector and if not what kinds of alternatives can be recommended to promote private investment. Some of controversial issues discussed in this paper are: whether the relationship between the transfer of ownership to the Authority and the free use of infrastructure by the private investor is based on a bilateral contract between the two; and whether the period of free use for the private investor should be measured by the total project profits and costs. In case of revertible projects such as BTO(Build-Transfer-Operate) BTL(Build-Transfer-Lease) and BOT(Build-Operate-Transfer) the ownership of infrastructure completed under the private-public participation projects will be transferred to the authority such as a state or local government while the private investor will be entitled to use such infrastructure free of charge for a specified period. This legal arrangement is a kind of contract between the public and the private sector not a separate legal action. In addition a private investor must be willing to invest if a private investment recovery structure assures its profits and returns on its investment. However the Korean Act permits a private sector to use the infrastructure for a ceratin period of time based on only the total project costs not on the sum of the total project costs plus project profits. Thus the Act fails to provide a legal framework for a private investor to recover adequate returns from its investment for such a limited period. Thus it is worth considering other laws such as the Act on Toll Road in Korea or the German Private Financing Law on Through Roads Construction (Fernstrassenbauprivatfinanzierungsgesetz) which considers the rate of return when the user fees as the recovery of the investment are decided. Since project profits or the rates of return are closely related to the competent authority and the infrastructure user who pays for user fees it is important to specify some provisions which guarantee some adequate returns to the project investors.
    번역하기

    Article 1 of the “Act on Private Participation in Infrastructure of Korea” states that the Act aims at contributing to the development of national economy by promoting private investments in public infrastructure in order to establish and operate ...

    Article 1 of the “Act on Private Participation in Infrastructure of Korea” states that the Act aims at contributing to the development of national economy by promoting private investments in public infrastructure in order to establish and operate more creative and effective infrastructure. In order to meet this goal it is an essential prerequisite to legally establish a project structure which ensures some appropriate returns to the private sector participating private investment projects. The main focus of this research paper is to review some relevant provisions of the Act to find out whether such provisions can provide some adequate returns as well as profits to private concessionaires in the private sector and if not what kinds of alternatives can be recommended to promote private investment. Some of controversial issues discussed in this paper are: whether the relationship between the transfer of ownership to the Authority and the free use of infrastructure by the private investor is based on a bilateral contract between the two; and whether the period of free use for the private investor should be measured by the total project profits and costs. In case of revertible projects such as BTO(Build-Transfer-Operate) BTL(Build-Transfer-Lease) and BOT(Build-Operate-Transfer) the ownership of infrastructure completed under the private-public participation projects will be transferred to the authority such as a state or local government while the private investor will be entitled to use such infrastructure free of charge for a specified period. This legal arrangement is a kind of contract between the public and the private sector not a separate legal action. In addition a private investor must be willing to invest if a private investment recovery structure assures its profits and returns on its investment. However the Korean Act permits a private sector to use the infrastructure for a ceratin period of time based on only the total project costs not on the sum of the total project costs plus project profits. Thus the Act fails to provide a legal framework for a private investor to recover adequate returns from its investment for such a limited period. Thus it is worth considering other laws such as the Act on Toll Road in Korea or the German Private Financing Law on Through Roads Construction (Fernstrassenbauprivatfinanzierungsgesetz) which considers the rate of return when the user fees as the recovery of the investment are decided. Since project profits or the rates of return are closely related to the competent authority and the infrastructure user who pays for user fees it is important to specify some provisions which guarantee some adequate returns to the project investors.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 류지태, "행정법신론 제14판" 박영사 2009

    2 반기로, "프로젝트 파이낸스" 한국금융연수원 1999

    3 한국개발연구원, "임대형 민자사업(BTL) 표준 실시협약" 2009

    4 한국개발연구원, "임대형 민자사업(BTL) 타당성 및 민간투자 적격성 조사 세부요령" 2009

    5 이규방, "인프라 민간투자사업의 표준실시협약(안) 지침 수립 연구" 국토연구원 2000

    6 심상달, "예비타당성조사 수행을 위한 일반지침 수정보완연구 (제4판)" 한국개발연구원 2004

    7 오준근, "영국법상 사회기반시설에 대한 민간투자사업과 공공계약규정의 관계에 관한 연구" 한국토지공법학회 42 : 413-434, 2008

    8 한국개발연구원, "수익형 민자사업(BTO) 표준실시협약(안)" 2010

    9 김대인, "사회기반시설을 위한 민간자본 참여에 대한 법적 검토" 한국토지공법학회 43 (43): 183-206, 2009

    10 홍성필, "사회기반시설에 대한 민긴투자법 해설" 한국개발연구원 2010

    1 류지태, "행정법신론 제14판" 박영사 2009

    2 반기로, "프로젝트 파이낸스" 한국금융연수원 1999

    3 한국개발연구원, "임대형 민자사업(BTL) 표준 실시협약" 2009

    4 한국개발연구원, "임대형 민자사업(BTL) 타당성 및 민간투자 적격성 조사 세부요령" 2009

    5 이규방, "인프라 민간투자사업의 표준실시협약(안) 지침 수립 연구" 국토연구원 2000

    6 심상달, "예비타당성조사 수행을 위한 일반지침 수정보완연구 (제4판)" 한국개발연구원 2004

    7 오준근, "영국법상 사회기반시설에 대한 민간투자사업과 공공계약규정의 관계에 관한 연구" 한국토지공법학회 42 : 413-434, 2008

    8 한국개발연구원, "수익형 민자사업(BTO) 표준실시협약(안)" 2010

    9 김대인, "사회기반시설을 위한 민간자본 참여에 대한 법적 검토" 한국토지공법학회 43 (43): 183-206, 2009

    10 홍성필, "사회기반시설에 대한 민긴투자법 해설" 한국개발연구원 2010

    11 황차용, "사회간접자본시설에 대한 민간투자법과 관련 법률의 체계에 관한 연구" 국토연구원 2004

    12 배득종, "민자유치론 -도시 및 사회공익시설을 중심으로-" 박영사 1996

    13 김홍수, "민간투자사업의 주요 쟁점별 협상방안 연구" 국토연구원 2003

    14 김성수, "민간투자사업의 성격과 사업자 선정의 법적 과제" 한국공법학회 36 (36): 461-488, 2008

    15 김대인, "민간투자사업관리법제 개선방안에 관한 연구Ⅰ-정부계약법과의 관계정립을 중심으로-" 한국법제연구원 2009

    16 범상운, "민간투자법제에 관한 연구" 조선대학교 2008

    17 윤성철, "민간투자 법제연구 -실시협약의 법적 성질 및 쟁송을 중심으로-" 한국학술정보 2006

    18 박원석, "미국의 유료도로제도에 대한 연구" 부산외국어대학교 비교법연구소 14 : 2003

    19 김성수, "개별행정법" 박영사 2004

    20 柳至泰, "寄附採納行爲에 대한 現行 判例檢討" 한국토지공법학회 11 : 53-70, 2001

    21 Scott L. Hoffman, "The Law and Business of International Project Finance" Cambridge University Press 2007

    22 HM Treasury, "Stsndardisation of PFI Contracts Version4" 2007

    23 OECD, "Public- Private Partnerships: In Pursuit of Risk Sharing and Value for Money" 2008

    24 Frederik Pretorius, "Project Finance for Construction & Infrastructure" Blackwell 2007

    25 UNCITRAL, "Legislative Guide on Privately Financed Infrastructure Projects" 2001

    26 UNIDO, "Guidance for Infrastructure Development through Build-Operate-Transfer(BOT) Projects" 1996

    27 김기수, "BTL사업 실시협약 표준안 연구" 한국개발연구원 공공투자관리센터 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.81 0.81 0.78
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.75 0.68 0.998 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼