전시작전통제권 전환과 한미동맹의 변화 = Transition of Wartime Operational Control & Changing of ROK-U.S. Alliance

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study examined, in the general, the ROK-U.S. Alliance maintained since the Armistice in 1953 and the wartime operational control exercised by the ROK-U.S. Forces in Korea(USFK). This study thereby presented a right direction for the ROK-U.S. Alliance to go forward in the 21st century and then argued that the ROK Forces should exercise wartime operational control exclusively throughout the Korean Peninsula. The reasons why the ROK Forces should regain wartime operational control as follows. First, the ROK Forces can take a leading role in unification process and prevent unnecessary intervention by neighboring countries. Second, the U.S. Forces can check any intervention by neighboring countries with its strategic flexibility and function as a strategic reserve for the ROK Forces. Third, ROK can play an important role by itself and maximize its national interests. Fourth, ROK can achieve balanced development of its army, navy, air force and demonstrates its deterrence against North Korean aggression. Fifth, the ROK Forces, historically, had experienced exercising operational control exclusively in the Vietnamese War within the framework of the ROK-U.S. Alliance. In the long term, a desirable ROK-U.S. Alliance should include that the ROK Forces take full charge of military operation in the Peninsula and that the U.S. Forces cover the entire Northeast Asian region. But the transition of Wartime Operational Control must be considered on condition of maintaining ROK people’s rights of survival. Transition of Wartime Operational Control which does not assure ROK people’s rights of survival cannot be made. So ROK should carry out every preparation to fulfill the three conditions for transition of Wartime Operational Control which is planned to happen in mid 2020s. Keeping pace with this, the ROK-U.S. alliance of 21st century should not focus only on the narrow-sighted alliance restrained to the Transition of Wartime Operational Control, but pursue future comprehensive and strategic alliance. Also ROK should consolidate national power so then Unified ROK will be achieved early assuring ROK people’s rights of survival.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 합동참모본부, "합동 ․ 연합작전 군사용어사전" 2004

2 "한승동"

3 신우용, "한미일 삼각동맹" 양서각 2007

4 윤정원, "한미동맹의 분석 : 지속과 변화" 화랑대연구소 2009

5 장용구, "한미동맹과 한국의 군사적 자율성" 한국학술정보 2014

6 류병현, "한미동맹과 작전통제권" 한국재향군인회 안보대학 2007

7 김성한, "한미동맹강화방안, 북한의 주요현안과 한미 전략적 공조" 통일연구원 2009

8 한용섭, "한미동맹 50년과 군사과제" 국방대학교 안보문제연구소 2003

9 황병무, "한미동맹 50년과 군사과제" 국방대학교 안보문제연구소 2003

10 한국정치사연구회 정치사분과, "한국전쟁의 이해" 역사비평사 1990

11 허만호, "한국전쟁과 휴전체제" 한국정치외교사학회 1997

12 "한겨레신문(2010/06/25)"

13 문선명, "평화를 사랑하는 세계인으로" 김영사 2009

14 "조선일보(2011/02/15)"

15 김명기, "정전체제의 전환 : 법적문제와 국제구도" 경북대 평화문제연구소 21 : 1996

16 송영선, "전시작전통제권 오해와 진실" 플래닛미디어 2006

17 류병현, "전시작전통제권 오해와 진실" 플래닛미디어 2006

18 "월간조선(2009/10)"

19 "오마이뉴스(2010/ 12/12)"

20 이상철, "안보와 자주성의 딜레마" 연경문화사 2004

21 배정호, "북한의 주요 현안과 한 ․ 미 전략적 공조" 통일연구원 2009

22 이정우, "북한 군사력의 평가와 한국의 안보정책 방향" 128 : 2013

23 이삼성, "미국의 대한정책과 한국민족주의 : 광주항쟁 ․ 민족통일 ․ 한미관계" 한길사 1993

24 국사편찬위원회, "대한민국사 자료집 29(이승만 관계서한 자료집)" 1996

25 김종대, "노무현, 시대의 문턱을 넘다" 나무와 숲 2010

26 Bandow, Daug, "너무 오래됐고 불필요하며 위험한 한미동맹" 2010

27 김계동, "남북한 체제통합론" 명인문화사 2006

28 김용현, "군사학개론" 백산출판사 2005

29 이강언, "군사학개론" 양서각 2007

30 이대우, "국제안보환경 변화와 한미동맹 재조정" 한울아카데미 2009

31 "국방일보(2007/09/20)"

32 "경향신문(2010/06/28)"

33 "http://www.tourdmz.com/04dmz/p1-4.php"

34 "http://www.mofa.go.kr/trade/un/about/index.jsp?mofat=001&menu=m_30_60_10"

35 "http://blog.daum.net/kem7chul/2655"

36 Richard Weitz, "Transforming Korea-US Defenses: The Agenda Ahead" 국가안전보장문제연구소 19 (19): 49-65, 2014

37 Christoph Bluth, "The ROK-US Alliance: Can It Endure?" 국가안전보장문제연구소 15 (15): 60-81, 2010

38 Zannou Andre Corneille, "ROK-U.S. Military Alliance and the Future of Korea's Defense Policy" 한국학중앙연구원 10 (10): 147-160, 2007

39 Lawrence E. Grinter, "Northeast Asian Security: Perspectives, Bargaining, and Issues In The US Alliances" 한국국제정치학회 9 (9): 157-178, 2011

40 Bruce W. Bennett, "Making a US-ROK Alliance Military Coordination Center Work after OPCON Transition: A US Perspective" 국가안전보장문제연구소 14 (14): 21-58, 2009

41 Richard H. Solomon, "Korea’s Security and the Future of the US-ROK Alliance: Moving Forward to the Past" KRIS 2000

42 Peter, Hayes, "Chapter 2 The ROK-US Alliance: Who Benefits? An Impartial View" 1996

43 권영효, "21세기 한미동맹과 주한미군의 장래" (7) : 2005

44 국방부, "2014 국방백서" 2014