한국판 London Handicap Scale의 타당도와 신뢰도

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 연구는 뇌졸중 환자의 참여제한을 측정하는 도구인 한국판 London Handicap Scale의 타당도와 신뢰도를 알아보기 위해 실시되었다. 외래 재활치료를 받고 있는 뇌졸중 환자 54명을 대상으로 하였다. 한국판 LHS의 문항내 적일치도는 Cronbach's α 값이 .791이었고, 급간내상관계수는 .983으로 신뢰도가 높았다. 구성타당도를 알아보기 위 해 탐색적 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 한국판 LHS는 2개의 요인으로 구성되며 설명력은 72.32%인 것으로 나타났다. 한국판 LHS와 한국판 수정바델지수와는 경제상태 항목을 제외하고 모든 항목에서 유의한 상관성이 있는 것으로 나 타났다(r=-.454 ~ -.819)(p<.01). 한국판 LHS의 신뢰도와 타당도가 높기 때문에, 임상에서 뇌졸중 환자의 참여제한을 측정하는 도구로 사용되는데 적절한 것으로 여겨진다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of the this study was to identify validity and reliability of the Korean version of the London Handicap Scale (K-LHS) measuring participation restriction for stroke survivors within outpatient rehabilitation setting. 54 stroke patients participated. The reliability was good with a Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient of .791 and .983, respectively. The results of exploratory factor analysis was that the K-LHS was constructed two factors and explanation power was 72.32%. There are significant correlation between K-MBI and subitems of K-LHS (r=-.454 ~ -.819)(p<.01), except economic item. Because the K-LHS seems to be a valid and reliable, thus, it is considered to be appropriate as a tool to measure participation restriction of stroke patients in clinical practice.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정한영, "한글판 수정바델지수(K-MBI)의 개발: 뇌졸중 환자 대상의 다기관 연구" 대한재활의학회 31 (31): 283-297, 2007

2 정혜영, "뇌졸중 환자의 작업치료 중재 결과를 측정하기 위해 사용된 평가도구에 관한 체계적 고찰" 대한작업치료학회 17 (17): 79-95, 2009

3 이승주, "WOMAC-VA3.0의 타당도 및 신뢰도-일부 슬관절 및 고관절 골관절염환자를 대상으로-" 한국전문물리치료학회 15 (15): 20-29, 2008

4 A. Goonetilleke, "Validity of the London Handicap Scale" 58 (58): 125-126, 1995

5 T. J. Seong, "Validity and Reliability(re)" Hakjisa 35-128, 2002

6 Y. J. Lee, "Understanding Factor Analysis" Seokjeong 2002

7 W. H. van Brakel, "The Participation Scale: Measuring a Key Concept in Pubic Health" 28 (28): 193-203, 2006

8 W. H. Brakel, "The Participation Scale: Measuring a Key Concept in Pubic Health" 28 (28): 193-203, 2006

9 J. M. Binkley, "The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Scale Development, Measurement Properties, and Clinical Application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network" 79 (79): 371-383, 1999

10 C. Jenkinson, "The London Handicap Scale: A Reevaluation of Its Validity Using Standard Scoring and Simple Summation" 68 (68): 365-367, 2000

11 S. Kutlay, "The Interval Scaling Properties of the London Handicap Scale: An Example From the Adaptation of the Scale for Use in Turkey" 25 (25): 248-255, 2011

12 J. Woo, "Survival, Disability, and Residence 20 months After Acute Stroke in a Chinese Population: Implications for Community Care" 14 (14): 36-40, 1992

13 C. H. Lee, "Research Methodology for Physical Therapists and Occupational Therapists" Gyechuk Cultural History 63-70, 2002

14 G. G. Whiteneck, "Quantifying Handicap: A New Measure of Long-term Rehabilitation Outcomes" 73 (73): 519-526, 1992

15 T. Kwok, "Quality of Life of Stroke Survivors: A 1-year Follow-up Study" 87 (87): 1177-1182, 2006

16 J. C. Nunnally, "Psychometric Theory" McGraw-Hill, Inc 1994

17 J. Desrosiers, "Predictors of Long-term Participation After Stroke" 28 (28): 221-230, 2006

18 S. B. O'Sullivan, "Physical Rehabilitation 5th ed" F. A. Davis 2007

19 V. Pou, "Participation After Stroke: Comparing 'Proxies and Patients' Perception" 40 (40): 28-35, 2008

20 C. V. Ganger, "Outcome of Comprehensive Medial Rehabilitation: Measurement by PULSES Profile and the Barthel Index" 60 (60): 145-154, 1979

21 R. H. Harwood, "Measuring the Outcomes of Day Hospital Attendance: A Comparison of the Barthel Index and London Handicap Scale" 14 (14): 527-531, 2000

22 R. A. Deyp, "Measuring the Functional Status of Patients With Low Back Pain" 69 (69): 1044-1122, 1988

23 R. Perenboom, "Measuring Participation According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health(ICF)" 25 (25): 577-587, 2003

24 R. Harwood, "Measuring Handicap: The London Handicap Scale, a New Outcome Measure for Chronic Disease" 3 (3): 11-16, 1994

25 J. Desrosiers, "Long-term Changes in Participation After Stroke" 13 (13): 86-96, 2006

26 A. Hershkovitz, "Is a Day Hospital Rehabilitation Programme Associated With Reduction of Handicap in Stroke Patients?" 18 (18): 261-266, 2004

27 WHO, "International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health" WHO 2001

28 A. Westergren, "Initial Validation of the Swedish Version of the London Handicap Scale" 15 (15): 1251-1256, 2006

29 S. D'Alisa, "How Does Stroke Restrict Participation in Long-term Post-stroke Survivors?" 112 (112): 57-162, 2005

30 R. S. K. Lo, "Handicap and Its Determinants of Change in Stroke Survivors: One-year Follow-up Study" 39 (39): 148-153, 2008

31 R. Harwood, "Handicap One Year After a Stroke: Validity of a New Scale" 57 (57): 825-829, 1994

32 J. W. Sturm, "Handicap After Stroke: How Does It Relate to Disability, Perception of Recovery, and Stroke Subtype?: The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMSIS)" 33 (33): 762-768, 2002

33 D. E. Beaton, "Guidelines for the Process of Cross-cultural Adaption of Self-report Measures" 25 (25): 3186-3191, 2000

34 E. Y. Park, "Development of Employer's Criteria Judged Critical to Employment of Persons With Mental Retardation" Kongju University 2007

35 J. P. C. Chau, "Determinants of Participation Restriction Among Community Dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Path Analysis" 7 (7): 49-, 2009

36 R. Lo, "Cross-cultural Validation of the London Handicap Scale in Hong Kong Chinese" 15 (15): 177-185, 2001

37 R. S. Lo, "Cross-cultural Validation of the London Handicap Scale and Comparison of Handicap Perception Between Chinese and UK Populations" 36 (36): 544-548, 2007

38 M. Seki, "Characteristics of Hemiplegic Out-patients With Stroke Who Try to Remove Their Clothes Unnecessarily" 28 (28): 71-74, 2001

39 K. L. Salter, "Assessment of Participation Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Stroke Rehabilitation Interventions" 30 (30): 339-342, 2007

40 T. Kwok, "A Comparison of the Long-term Health Related Quality of Life and Handicap of Stroke Patients in Mainland China and Hong Kong" 3 (3): 13-20, 2010