『고려도경』과 고려의 문화적 형상 = GoRyeoDokyoung And Goryeo Culture

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This thesis intends to explore what kind of culture Goryeo had and what relationship Korea and China had for the 12th century in GoRyeoDoKyoung(高驪圖經). In GoRyeoDoKyoung, the society of Goryeo is described and explained in great detail focusing on SeoGung`s experiences at close range more than its general view. This is mainly because there was a limit to the time and area for his visit. He stayed in Goryeo for 3 months spending about 1 month in Gaegyoung during the period. Most of SeoGung`s experiences usually occurred in Gaegyoung where he did not go beyond the boundary of the palace. This fact led him to write his own experiences associated with common objects such as dishes with many chances to touch and observe them at ease within the area. SeoGung`s observation was made in a very narrow way about people and literature of Goryeo. Prestigious figures. who were concerned with LeeJaGyeom(李資謙). lived around him at close range. It is highly possible that, in terms of literature, he mainly encountered some pieces related to the palace or written in party places. That is why all things ManDangPung(晩唐風) said in GoRyeoDoKyoung are not absolutely true. For this reason. SeoGung had a balanced perspective on the culture of Goryeo which had to be explored and reconsidered between ``what could be written`` and ``what could not be written``. Meanwhile, the two things. ``what SeoGung literally wrote`` and ``what he really wanted to write``. need to be seriously considered. GoRyeoDoKyoung was organized thoroughly under the ideologic idea. ``Hwai``. Its ultimate goal was to keep Song`s position the center of world persistently confirming the cultural similarity between Song and Goryeo with a premise that Song was superior to Goryeo. GoRyeoDoKyoung was a strong cultural publicity material to realize Song`s political and diplomatic desire that they wanted their installation system to the kings of Goryeo again after Yo`s collapse. However, the desperateness of the publicity material conversely shows how dignified Goryeo`s status was both culturally and politically. King Injong refused Song`s demands of installation, temporary roads and military force. QoRyeoDoKyoung is not a description of what actually happened but a desire of what should have happened. In other words, GoRyeoDoKyoung tells us largely about Goryeo`s vision beyond SeoGung`s experiences. GoRyeoDoKyoung has been used as a source both when China understands Korea and when Korea finds their lost memory. However. China`s tendency to use the book as a text for ``Hwai`` has built the relationship between two countries set in the ideology as SeoGung`s intention. Beyond the culture of Goryeo, this affects on what culture has been formed through the whole Korean history.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신은제, "？？高麗史？？ 편찬 후 고려에 대한 기억" 한국중세사학회 (23) : 61-89, 2007

2 김한규, "한‧중 관계사 상의 『선화봉사고려도경』In 한중관계 200년-동행과 공유의 역사" 소나무 2008

3 장남원, "필사본 『고려도경(高麗圖經)』의 유포와 의의" 한국문화연구원 17 : 189-218, 2009

4 조동원, "역주선화봉사고려도경" 황소자리 21-26, 2003

5 김대식, "고려초기 사행(使行) 기록의 검토-<<해외사정광기(海外使程 廣記)>>를 중심으로" 한국역사연구회 (58) : 183-212, 2005

6 남인국, "고려중기 정치세력연구" 신서원 1999

7 이혜순, "고려전기 한문학사" 이화여자대학교 출판부 2004

8 이종문, "고려전기 한문학 연구" 고려대학교 1991

9 이종문, "高麗時代까지의 漢文學 硏究의 現在 狀況과 資料整理 果題" 한국한문학회 41 (41): 205-225, 2008

10 이효형, "高麗前期의 北方認識 －발해？거란？여진 인식 비교－" 부경역사연구소 (19) : 53-90, 2006

11 김수연, "『고려도경』연구의 동향과 활용 가능성" 한국문화연구원 16 : 269-280, 2009

12 한영우, "『고려도경』에 나타난 한국사 체계" 서울대학교 도서관 7 : 1983

13 김병인, "『高麗圖經』 「人物」 條에 나타난 ‘族望’과 고려중기의 정치세력" 호남사학회 19 : 151-172, 2002