선택적 중재합의의 유효성에 관한 연구 = A Study on Validity of Selective Arbitration Agreement

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Arbitration agreement is an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain dispute which have arisen or which may arise between them. Arbitration agreement is an important factor to judge the existence of the mutual arbitration agreement and it should be the object of examination before anything else to judge the existence of the mutual arbitration agreement.
Recently the Supreme Court seemed to make negative position about validity of selective arbitration agreement. However theoretically and scientifically selective arbitration agreement is a valid arbitration agreement. Examine selective arbitration agreement throughly according to the autonomy of the parties rules, wide jurisdiction rules of interpretation, principle of kompetenz-kompetenz, and moses cone presumption rule of interpretation, selective arbitration agreement is a valid arbitration agreement.
Also analyze precedents in accordance with validity of selective from all angles which are voluntary agreement of the parties, agreement in writing, principle of private autonomy, comparative study of domestic and foreign precedents and mutual relation of arbitration and trial, selective arbitration agreement based on principle of private by the parties is considered a valid arbitration agreement.
Courts should actively accept selective arbitration agreement as a valid arbitration agreement to make foreign companies prefer arbitration in Korea and in oder for arbitration to be widely used in disputes.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 선택적 중재합의의 해석의 기본원칙
• Ⅲ. 선택적 중재합의의 실례와 국내외 법원판례
• Ⅳ. 법원판례 분석
• Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "중재합의의 유효성" (310) : 2003.겨울.

2 "정부건설공사계약 중재조항의 재해석" (302) : 2001.겨울.

3 "소송과 중재 모두를 규정한 선택적 분쟁해결조항의 효력" (305) : 2002.가을.

4 "선택적 중재합의의 유효성" (307) : 2003.봄.

5 "선택적 중재합의의 문제점 인권과 정의" 대한변호사협회 337 : 2004.9.

6 "선택적 중재합의에 관한 판례의 연구" (309) : 2003.가을.

7 "선택적 중재조항 관련 대법원 판례의 해석과 의미" (312) : 2004.여름.

8 "선택적 분쟁해결조항의 연구" (308) : 2004.여름.

9 "상사중재법론" 박영사 2001.

10 "사례로 배우는 무역실무" 무역경영사 2003.

11 "공사계약 일반조건상의 중재관련 조항은 유효하다" (306) : 2002.겨울.

12 "건설중재시 선택적 중재합의의 재해석" (314) : 2004.겨울.

13 "UNCITRAL Case Law on Uncitral Texts" 2003.

14 "UNCITRAL Case Law on Uncitral Texts" 1993.

15 "UNCITRAL Case Law on Uncitral Texts" 1993.

16 "The Rules for the ICC Court of Arbitration The European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration" -8,

17 "Satcom International Group PLC v. Orbcomm International Partners" 49F. Supp. 2d. 331 1999.

18 "Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration" 1986.

19 "Lan Manezies" Lloyds's of press London 1992-,

20 "International Commercial Arbitration in the United States" Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1994.

21 "Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration" 1978.

22 "ADR Principales and Practice" ADR Principales and Practice 1999.

23 "A Guide to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration" 1994.