RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    반부패 국제 레짐 형성에 대한 비판이론적 접근 = 신자유주의적 반부패 규범의 제도화와 반부패 전략

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    For the past 20 years, corruption has been increasing grossly and the pattern of corruption has shown also various phenomena all over the world. It is considered that globalization has played a directive role in stimulating corruption. Therefore as a global level, it is defined that corruption should be dealt with by close cooperation of governments, civil society and international organizations.
    But there have been no internationally cooperative actions to curb and control corruption sine the 1990s in the international community. Even though the international discourses on anti-corruption has been existed intermittently from time to time since the 1990s, now the fact that international anti-corruption norm begins developing and constructing dynamically has raised another question. If the anti-corruption discourses have political intentions, what will the factors explaining the process of constructing international anti-corruption norms become?
    Against this backdrop, the research is conducted to criticize the current international anti-corruption norm and its feature of institutionalizing process in figuring out international anti-corruption regime and the strategies of its core group. In this process, the study has another perspective, unlike the mainstream regime theories, applying to the international anti-corruption norm and the institutionalizing process, insisting a possibility of another explanation.
    As a result, the international anti-corruption regime must be recognized only under the current international circumstances that anti-corruption issues are dealt with as political and normative perspectives on the global economy and the flow of international capital. Thus the current international anti-corruption system can be understood as political and ideological pillars of transnational hegemony supporting neoliberal economic globalization and liberal democracy.
    번역하기

    For the past 20 years, corruption has been increasing grossly and the pattern of corruption has shown also various phenomena all over the world. It is considered that globalization has played a directive role in stimulating corruption. Therefore as a ...

    For the past 20 years, corruption has been increasing grossly and the pattern of corruption has shown also various phenomena all over the world. It is considered that globalization has played a directive role in stimulating corruption. Therefore as a global level, it is defined that corruption should be dealt with by close cooperation of governments, civil society and international organizations.
    But there have been no internationally cooperative actions to curb and control corruption sine the 1990s in the international community. Even though the international discourses on anti-corruption has been existed intermittently from time to time since the 1990s, now the fact that international anti-corruption norm begins developing and constructing dynamically has raised another question. If the anti-corruption discourses have political intentions, what will the factors explaining the process of constructing international anti-corruption norms become?
    Against this backdrop, the research is conducted to criticize the current international anti-corruption norm and its feature of institutionalizing process in figuring out international anti-corruption regime and the strategies of its core group. In this process, the study has another perspective, unlike the mainstream regime theories, applying to the international anti-corruption norm and the institutionalizing process, insisting a possibility of another explanation.
    As a result, the international anti-corruption regime must be recognized only under the current international circumstances that anti-corruption issues are dealt with as political and normative perspectives on the global economy and the flow of international capital. Thus the current international anti-corruption system can be understood as political and ideological pillars of transnational hegemony supporting neoliberal economic globalization and liberal democracy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "전략관계적 국가이론: 국가의 제자리 찾기" 서울: 한울 2000

    2 "유럽연합의 화폐통합에 대한 네오그람시안적 접근: 팍스 아메리카나의 위기와 유럽의 신자유주의적 재편" 42집 (42집): 2002

    3 "세계화(Globalization)와 헤게모니" 32 (32): 1998

    4 "부패의 정치경제학: 맑스주의적 접근" 경상대학교 사회과학연구소 2000

    5 "금융의 세계화" 서울: 한울 2002

    6 "국제협력을 통한 효과적인 부패방지" 서울: 한국행정학회 2003

    7 "” in Haas ” special issue of International Organization 46" “k (“k): 1992

    8 "lesson from inductive analysis.” in Krasner" Cornell University Press 1983.

    9 "http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/gproc (검색일 2006.10.26)."

    10 "http://www.worldbank.org (검색일: 2006.10.14)."

    1 "전략관계적 국가이론: 국가의 제자리 찾기" 서울: 한울 2000

    2 "유럽연합의 화폐통합에 대한 네오그람시안적 접근: 팍스 아메리카나의 위기와 유럽의 신자유주의적 재편" 42집 (42집): 2002

    3 "세계화(Globalization)와 헤게모니" 32 (32): 1998

    4 "부패의 정치경제학: 맑스주의적 접근" 경상대학교 사회과학연구소 2000

    5 "금융의 세계화" 서울: 한울 2002

    6 "국제협력을 통한 효과적인 부패방지" 서울: 한국행정학회 2003

    7 "” in Haas ” special issue of International Organization 46" “k (“k): 1992

    8 "lesson from inductive analysis.” in Krasner" Cornell University Press 1983.

    9 "http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/gproc (검색일 2006.10.26)."

    10 "http://www.worldbank.org (검색일: 2006.10.14)."

    11 "http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/nis (검색일 2006.9.10)."

    12 "http://www.11iacc.org/iacc/html/intro.html (검색일: 2006.9.10)."

    13 "http://intra.undp.org/bdp/anti-corruption/sourcebook_ati.htm (검색일"

    14 "What Dose Corruption Mean in a Democracy?" 48 (48): 2004

    15 "The unknown depths of political theory: The case for a multidimensional concept of corruption" 42 : 2004

    16 "The business of bribery: Globalization, economic liberalization, and the problem of corruption" 32 : 1999

    17 "The TI Source Book" Berlin: Transparency International 2000

    18 "Strengthening Bank Group Engagement on Governance and Anticorruption" IMF/World Bank 2006

    19 "Social forces, states, and world orders" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996

    20 "Presentation of Results and Recommendations" OECD 2001

    21 "OECD Symposium on Corruption and Good Governance" OECD 4 (4): 1996

    22 "Neoliberalism, Globalisation and International Relations" London: Pluto Press 2005

    23 "Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service: Background Document" OECD 2004

    24 "Mainstreaming Anti-Corruption Activities in World Bank Assistance: A Review of Progress since 1997" Washington, D.C.: World Bank 2004

    25 "Institute for International Economics" 1990.

    26 "Helping Countries Combat Corruption: The Role of the World Bank" 1997

    27 "Gramsci, hegemony, and international relations: an essay in method" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996

    28 "From Washington to Post-Washington Consensus: Neoliberal Agendas for Economic Development" London: Pluto Press 2005

    29 "Explaining Organizational Change in International Development: The Role of Complexity in Anti-Corruption Work" 16 : 2004

    30 "Cave 'Cave! Hic dragones': a neo-Gramscian deconstruction and reconstruction of International regime theory" 5 (5): 1998

    31 "Anti-corruption Instruments and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises" OECD 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-03-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Studies -> Korean Journal of International Relations KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-12-01 등재 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-06-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Relations -> The Korean Journal of International Studies KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 1.12
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.07 1.09 1.415 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼