RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Assessing the effectiveness of state policy regimes on health-care costs, access, and efficiency.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10560545

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    During the last decade, the burden on individuals, families, and businesses of prohibitive health-care costs-and lack of access to affordable health insurance-have motivated state decision makers to prioritize health-care issues on state public policy agendas. This research sought to determine how political ideologies, state administrative structures, and health-care policies affect health-care costs, access, and efficient use of resources. The study was conducted in two phases. First, states were categorized according to their approaches to health-care policy-making (expressed as policy regimes); and second, the direction and strength of influence of policy regimes on health system costs, access, and efficiency were tested.
    Although the findings related to the impact of policy regimes on health system outcomes were unpersuasive, two major conclusions can be drawn from this research. First, the policy regime typology (as operationalized in this research) does not sort the states into discrete categories. States appear to possess combinations of policy regime characteristics that reflect the history of the incremental development of government resources.
    Second, the impact of policy regimes on health system outcomes (as operationalized in this research) cannot be determined. The results for cost, access and efficiency models were insignificant. When the policy regime variables were transformed into three separate measures, the results for Ideology were strong enough to indicate that, as state ideology became more Liberal, access to health insurance increased and efficiency improved.
    Of the control variables, measures for the supply of hospitals and physicians were the most significant for the cost model. According to the linear regression, as the supply of physicians and hospital beds increased, Per Capita Health-Care Expenditures increased. Under the linear model for Efficiency, the variable for hospital bed supply was significant, and Efficiency decreased as the hospital bed supply increased.
    When the model for cost was revised to reflect percent change in expenditures, the Competitive Hospital Market variable was significant, and Percent Change in Expenditures decreased as the percent of population living in competitive hospital markets increased. A revised model for efficiency resulted in significance for the Average Personal Income variable. As the Average Personal Income increased, Efficiency increased.
    번역하기

    During the last decade, the burden on individuals, families, and businesses of prohibitive health-care costs-and lack of access to affordable health insurance-have motivated state decision makers to prioritize health-care issues on state public polic...

    During the last decade, the burden on individuals, families, and businesses of prohibitive health-care costs-and lack of access to affordable health insurance-have motivated state decision makers to prioritize health-care issues on state public policy agendas. This research sought to determine how political ideologies, state administrative structures, and health-care policies affect health-care costs, access, and efficient use of resources. The study was conducted in two phases. First, states were categorized according to their approaches to health-care policy-making (expressed as policy regimes); and second, the direction and strength of influence of policy regimes on health system costs, access, and efficiency were tested.
    Although the findings related to the impact of policy regimes on health system outcomes were unpersuasive, two major conclusions can be drawn from this research. First, the policy regime typology (as operationalized in this research) does not sort the states into discrete categories. States appear to possess combinations of policy regime characteristics that reflect the history of the incremental development of government resources.
    Second, the impact of policy regimes on health system outcomes (as operationalized in this research) cannot be determined. The results for cost, access and efficiency models were insignificant. When the policy regime variables were transformed into three separate measures, the results for Ideology were strong enough to indicate that, as state ideology became more Liberal, access to health insurance increased and efficiency improved.
    Of the control variables, measures for the supply of hospitals and physicians were the most significant for the cost model. According to the linear regression, as the supply of physicians and hospital beds increased, Per Capita Health-Care Expenditures increased. Under the linear model for Efficiency, the variable for hospital bed supply was significant, and Efficiency decreased as the hospital bed supply increased.
    When the model for cost was revised to reflect percent change in expenditures, the Competitive Hospital Market variable was significant, and Percent Change in Expenditures decreased as the percent of population living in competitive hospital markets increased. A revised model for efficiency resulted in significance for the Average Personal Income variable. As the Average Personal Income increased, Efficiency increased.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼