과학영재의 논증 활동에서 나타나는 반박 유형 분석 = An Analysis of the Type of Rebuttal in Argumentation among Science-Gifted Student

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to analyze the argumentation of gifted students in the perspective of rebuttal. Rebuttal is a significant indicator of argumentation quality; it is also an essential component for science learning through interaction. However, most previous research point out insufficient use of rebuttal in student`s argumentation. The argumentation of 37 8th grade students, enrolled in institutes for the scientifically gifted in Seoul, are observed and recorded for 4 hours. The argumentation topic is about how to measure the brightness of the sun. Based on Verheij`s (2005) five types of rebuttal patterns, the features of rebuttal are analyzed. It is found that students` argumentation include all of the five rebuttal types: rebuttal of the data, the claim, the warrant, warrant`s applicability, and connection between data and claim. It is also found that these five types can be categorized in two groups. The first group consists of first three types and is characterized by the disagreement with the validity of what has been said. The second group consists of the last two types and is characterized by the suggestion or additional information for missing links in argumentation.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이봉우, "탐구 토론에서 예비과학교사들의 논증 분석" 한국과학교육학회 30 (30): 739-751, 2010

2 조현준, "초등과학 영재의 논증활동에서 사용된 증거의 수준 분석" 한국과학교육학회 28 (28): 495-505, 2008

3 이고은, "인터넷 메신저를 활용한 과학 수업에서 나타나는 학생들의 논변활동의 특성: 과학 영재 학생들의 사사과정의 사례" 한국지구과학회 31 (31): 625-636, 2010

4 이선경, "소집단 토론에서 발생하는 학생들의 상호작용적 논증 유형 및 특징" 대한화학회 50 (50): 79-88, 2006

5 신호심, "문제해결형 탐구실험에서 나타난 영재학생들의 논의 양상 및 논의활동에 대한 인식" 한국과학교육학회 31 (31): 567-586, 2011

6 박정은, "논증 구조 교육을 통한 고등학교 학생들의 과학 글쓰기 분석: 과학 글쓰기 장르에 따른 글쓰기 과제를 중심으로" 한국과학교육학회 29 (29): 824-847, 2009

7 고현범, "논변의 사용" 고려대학교출판부 2006

8 강순민, "과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 논의과정 요소의 특성" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2004

9 곽경화, "과학적 논의과정 활동을 통한 학생들의 논의과정 변화 및 논의상황에 따른 논의과정 특성" 한국과학교육학회 29 (29): 400-413, 2009

10 이지영, "갈등 상황에서 구성된 중학생들의 소집단 논변활동 유형" 한국생물교육학회 39 (39): 235-247, 2011

11 Sandoval, W. A., "What can argumentation tell us about epistemology?, In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from classroom-based research" 71-88, 2008

12 Chin, C., "Student's questions and discursive interaction : their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science" 47 (47): 883-908, 2010

13 Kolsto, D. S., "Social aspects of argumentation, In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from classroom-based research" 47-69, 2008

14 Khun, D., "Science argument: Implication for teaching and learning scientific thinking" 77 (77): 319-337, 1993

15 Erduran, S., "Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms, In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from classroom-based research" 47-69, 2008

16 Verheij, B., "Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin's scheme" 19 : 347-371, 2005

17 Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroom" 84 (84): 287-312, 2000

18 Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., "Designing Argumentation Learning Environments, In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from classroom-based research" 35-53, 2008

19 Garcia-Mila, M., "Cognitive foundations of learning argumentation, In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from classroom-based research" 29-45, 2008

20 Erduran, S., "Argumentation in science education: An overview, In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from classroom-based research" 3-27, 2008

21 Kelly, G. J., "Aanlysis of lines of reasoning in written argumentation, In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from classroom-based research" 71-88, 2008