RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      상심실성 빈맥의 치료로서 아데노신의 편리한 투여 방법 = A Convernient Method of Adenosine Administration for Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30054160

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: The purpose of this study was to observe the success rate, the average of total administration doses and the complications associated with a convenient method of adenosine admininstration for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT).
      Methods: A non-blind, randomized, prospective study was conducted during the 30 months from January 1999 to June 2001. We enrolled 65 cases during this period. The number of cases in the standard method group was 35, and that in the mixed method group was 30. In the standard method group, 6 mg of adenosine was administered intra venously; therefore, 15~20 ml of normal saline was immediately flushed. This method is usually used and recommended. In the mixed method group, 6 mg of adenosine had been previously mixed with 15 ml of normal saline was administered intravenously without any additional manipulation. We evaluated the success rate, the average successful doses, and the complications of each group.
      Results: The success rate was 80% in the standard method group and 85.7% in the mixed method group, but this difference was not statistically significant (Chi square test, p=0.39). The average of total admininstration doses were 10.3±6.3 mg in the standard method group and 11.0±6.5 mg in the mixed method group, but this difference is not statistically significant (student t-test, p=0.07). There was no remarkable complication in the mixed method group.
      Conclusion: The mixed method was effective and more convenient than the standard method. A further, larger study is required.
      번역하기

      Purpose: The purpose of this study was to observe the success rate, the average of total administration doses and the complications associated with a convenient method of adenosine admininstration for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). ...

      Purpose: The purpose of this study was to observe the success rate, the average of total administration doses and the complications associated with a convenient method of adenosine admininstration for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT).
      Methods: A non-blind, randomized, prospective study was conducted during the 30 months from January 1999 to June 2001. We enrolled 65 cases during this period. The number of cases in the standard method group was 35, and that in the mixed method group was 30. In the standard method group, 6 mg of adenosine was administered intra venously; therefore, 15~20 ml of normal saline was immediately flushed. This method is usually used and recommended. In the mixed method group, 6 mg of adenosine had been previously mixed with 15 ml of normal saline was administered intravenously without any additional manipulation. We evaluated the success rate, the average successful doses, and the complications of each group.
      Results: The success rate was 80% in the standard method group and 85.7% in the mixed method group, but this difference was not statistically significant (Chi square test, p=0.39). The average of total admininstration doses were 10.3±6.3 mg in the standard method group and 11.0±6.5 mg in the mixed method group, but this difference is not statistically significant (student t-test, p=0.07). There was no remarkable complication in the mixed method group.
      Conclusion: The mixed method was effective and more convenient than the standard method. A further, larger study is required.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2020-05-08 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society Of Emergency Medicine -> The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.23 0.23 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.22 0.22 0.339 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼