RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      그리스의 금융투자업규제와 그 시사점에 관한 연구 = The Greek Regulation over the Financial Investment Business and Its Lessons

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99529852

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Recently so many countries are experiencing difficulties in financial crisis originated from the United States and the EU. As is generally known, the EU was infected from the United States. Especially PIIGS expose themselves to state defaults. Greece is the core of financial turbulence and the worst because Germany and France are the two largest creditors in Greece. If Greece is in insolvency, the two largest creditors cannot get their money from her. The EU`s entire economy will be about to be collapsed. The author examines the Greek financial regulation on the investment activities and there are several differences as follows: (1) While Greece has several regulators on financial companies including investment companies, Korea has one regulator on the financial companies such as bank, insurance and investment companies. For the quickness of measures on investment companies, the latter is better than the former. (2) There is a compliance officer for investment companies in Korea. However, there is not in Greece. Because Greece does not have any compliance officer even though Greece has an internal control mechanism, the efficiency of such internal control mechanism may not work well. In this sense, the Korean legislation is better than the Greek legislation. (3) Korea has a preliminary authorization for investment companies beyond authorization, but Greece does not. Because such preliminary authorization for investment business in Korea may be an overlapped regulation in the financial market, the preliminary authorization needs to be examined. (4) While the standard of doing business for electronic money does not differ between the types of financial companies such as banking, insurance and investment in Greece, such a Korean standard of doing business for electronic money differ between bank companies and non-bank companies. Because it may occur regulatory arbitrage to the financial market, such an unequal authorization of doing business for electronic money needs to be reviewed. (5) Korea has a prompt corrective action on investment companies, but Greece does not. Because such prompt corrective action needs to be imposed on investment companies and their group for the efficiency of the consolidation-centered regulation, the Korean legal system is better than the Greek legal system.
      번역하기

      Recently so many countries are experiencing difficulties in financial crisis originated from the United States and the EU. As is generally known, the EU was infected from the United States. Especially PIIGS expose themselves to state defaults. Greece ...

      Recently so many countries are experiencing difficulties in financial crisis originated from the United States and the EU. As is generally known, the EU was infected from the United States. Especially PIIGS expose themselves to state defaults. Greece is the core of financial turbulence and the worst because Germany and France are the two largest creditors in Greece. If Greece is in insolvency, the two largest creditors cannot get their money from her. The EU`s entire economy will be about to be collapsed. The author examines the Greek financial regulation on the investment activities and there are several differences as follows: (1) While Greece has several regulators on financial companies including investment companies, Korea has one regulator on the financial companies such as bank, insurance and investment companies. For the quickness of measures on investment companies, the latter is better than the former. (2) There is a compliance officer for investment companies in Korea. However, there is not in Greece. Because Greece does not have any compliance officer even though Greece has an internal control mechanism, the efficiency of such internal control mechanism may not work well. In this sense, the Korean legislation is better than the Greek legislation. (3) Korea has a preliminary authorization for investment companies beyond authorization, but Greece does not. Because such preliminary authorization for investment business in Korea may be an overlapped regulation in the financial market, the preliminary authorization needs to be examined. (4) While the standard of doing business for electronic money does not differ between the types of financial companies such as banking, insurance and investment in Greece, such a Korean standard of doing business for electronic money differ between bank companies and non-bank companies. Because it may occur regulatory arbitrage to the financial market, such an unequal authorization of doing business for electronic money needs to be reviewed. (5) Korea has a prompt corrective action on investment companies, but Greece does not. Because such prompt corrective action needs to be imposed on investment companies and their group for the efficiency of the consolidation-centered regulation, the Korean legal system is better than the Greek legal system.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼