(Abstract) This study examines the impact of the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence on artistic creation and copyright law, using the “Ghibli-style trend” that emerged in April 2025 as a case study. In particular, it analyze...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17362749
경산 : 대구가톨릭대학교 대학원, 2026
학위논문(석사) -- 대구가톨릭대학교 대학원 , 회화학과 , 2026. 2
2026
한국어
생성형 AI ; 지브리 스타일 ; AI 예술 ; 저작권 ; Generative AI ; Ghibli Style ; AI Profile Images ; Copyright Law ; Generative art
경상북도
vi, 36 p. ; 26 cm
지도교수: 송중덕
I804:47023-200000965139
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
(Abstract) This study examines the impact of the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence on artistic creation and copyright law, using the “Ghibli-style trend” that emerged in April 2025 as a case study. In particular, it analyze...
(Abstract)
This study examines the impact of the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence on artistic creation and copyright law, using the “Ghibli-style trend” that emerged in April 2025 as a case study. In particular, it analyzes the legal and ethical issues surrounding AI-generated art by focusing on copyright disputes related to the generation of Ghibli-style images, and investigates how contemporary artists employ generative AI technologies in their creative practices.
Recently, generative AI has increasingly been deployed in the form of AI chatbots that integrate large language models with image-generation models, leading to widespread use not only among AI specialists but also among general users. Beyond serving as a tool for enhancing productivity or expanding creativity, AI has become a medium for leisure and trend formation through the sharing of AI-generated or edited images on social media. At the same time, concerns have been raised regarding potential copyright infringement against human artists due to the unauthorized use of existing works in AI training processes, while legal compensation and remedial mechanisms remain insufficient. Under current Korean copyright law, non-human creators are not recognized as authors, and although limited copyright protection is granted to works created with generative AI, regulatory frameworks addressing unauthorized training on copyrighted works are still inadequate.
Finally, by comparing three contemporary projects that integrate AI and art <The Next Rembrandt>, <Ai vs AI>, and <The Evolving God, Gaia> this study identifies shifts in the direction of artistic development during the transitional period from the digital age to the age of AI. Given that numerous prior studies have concluded that artificial intelligence holds potential as a medium of artistic expression, this research anticipates that future studies will increasingly explore artistic experiences and practices involving generative AI.
목차 (Table of Contents)