RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    Eastern Masculinity Meets Western Audiences: A Study on the Representation of Masculinity in A Better Tomorrow as Opposed to Rambo

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Hollywood in 1980s produced action films with heroic protagonist who would eventually achieve victory against all odds, and American audience loved them. The representatives of such films would be First Blood(1982), Rambo:First Blood Part Ⅱ(1985) and the third sequel in 1988, and the protagonist, Rambo, represented the personification of macho masculinity and became the darling of Hollywood action films. On the other hand, a few years later in the late 1980s, Hong Kong produced a series of films called romantic gangster thriller or so-called Hong Kong noir. They are often called romantic 'hero' films after the original, Chinese title of A Better Tomorrow(John Woo, 1986). Despite the fact that American film audiences in general have a notorious antipathy to foreign-language films, John Woo’s hero films succeeded in attracting them, to some extent. Eventually, the director gained fame as an auteur in action genre, and a bootleg video market for his films was established.

    This essay tries to find out how John Woo’s hero films attracted American audiences in his films, in terms of Eastern-Chinese, to be more precise ways of representing masculinity. By examining, comparing and contrasting the first two Rambo films and the first two A Better Tomorrow films, each as the representatives of Hollywood action films and Hong Kong hero films, I would unveil how Eastern, to be more precise Chinese, and Western concepts and representations of masculinity differ, and how the representation of masculinity finds the common ground with the American or Western standards of masculinity and stands out at the same time.

    First of all, the essay examines the ways the protagonists of A Better Tomorrow like Chow Yun-fat wearing raincoat and sunglasses are portrayed in comparison with Stallone exhibiting muscular body. Rambo expresses raw masculinity focusing on the muscular male body, but A Better Tomorrow draws attention on the face and facial expression of the characters. Close-up, the efficient device to force the audience to have a hard look at what is shown on the screen, is used on the muscular body parts in Rambo and on interpreting the facial expressions in A Better Tomorrow. The fact that A Better Tomorrow expresses only dressed, tamed male may be interpreted as consuming the images of Asian male, which is undersexed or desexualized, thus Western male audiences could accept the film series without feeling threatened. Slow motion and long takes with music are used in the battle scenes of A Better Tomorrow to emphasize the importance of emotions the main characters share, which is solemn and tragic feelings as they try to defend friendship, loyalty and honor. On the other hand, Rambo’s body in close-ups makes the audience to concentrate on the fragmented body rather than the emotive feelings, thus to materialize and to desire his body as a sexual object.

    The cultural and psychological backgrounds are also different. Rambo inherits individualism, which is found in the tradition of mythical heroes of the West, and it fits to the film’s theme:the individual’s struggle against an unjust system. On the other hand, the protagonists in A Better Tomorrow put the highest values on the brotherhood, not a literal but figurative one bound with loyalty and honor. Wide shots place the protagonists in the same frame and symbolize the brotherhood of enduring and struggling through all the hardships together. The roots of such brotherhood can be found in Chinese cultural sentiments that values heart and emotive feelings among people rather than reason or principles, and in the Chinese classic literature, The Romance of the Three Kingdoms.

    Lastly, but not least, the common factor between Rambo films and A Better Tomorrow sequels seems not only interesting but also meaningful. It is nothing but the fact that so-called love interests or physical affection with females do not exist. It is just like the lonely hero walking into the sunset in Western genre or Batman who has problems being in a serious relationship with a woman. In short, John Woo’s romantic gangster films share Hollywood’s strategy to deny the hero's relationship with females and to focus on the male hero. And, by doing so, they efficiently moderate and deliver unfamiliar concept of Eastern masculinity represented by brotherhood in male community.

    번역하기

    Hollywood in 1980s produced action films with heroic protagonist who would eventually achieve victory against all odds, and American audience loved them. The representatives of such films would be First Blood(1982), Rambo:First Blood Part Ⅱ(1985) ...

    Hollywood in 1980s produced action films with heroic protagonist who would eventually achieve victory against all odds, and American audience loved them. The representatives of such films would be First Blood(1982), Rambo:First Blood Part Ⅱ(1985) and the third sequel in 1988, and the protagonist, Rambo, represented the personification of macho masculinity and became the darling of Hollywood action films. On the other hand, a few years later in the late 1980s, Hong Kong produced a series of films called romantic gangster thriller or so-called Hong Kong noir. They are often called romantic 'hero' films after the original, Chinese title of A Better Tomorrow(John Woo, 1986). Despite the fact that American film audiences in general have a notorious antipathy to foreign-language films, John Woo’s hero films succeeded in attracting them, to some extent. Eventually, the director gained fame as an auteur in action genre, and a bootleg video market for his films was established.

    This essay tries to find out how John Woo’s hero films attracted American audiences in his films, in terms of Eastern-Chinese, to be more precise ways of representing masculinity. By examining, comparing and contrasting the first two Rambo films and the first two A Better Tomorrow films, each as the representatives of Hollywood action films and Hong Kong hero films, I would unveil how Eastern, to be more precise Chinese, and Western concepts and representations of masculinity differ, and how the representation of masculinity finds the common ground with the American or Western standards of masculinity and stands out at the same time.

    First of all, the essay examines the ways the protagonists of A Better Tomorrow like Chow Yun-fat wearing raincoat and sunglasses are portrayed in comparison with Stallone exhibiting muscular body. Rambo expresses raw masculinity focusing on the muscular male body, but A Better Tomorrow draws attention on the face and facial expression of the characters. Close-up, the efficient device to force the audience to have a hard look at what is shown on the screen, is used on the muscular body parts in Rambo and on interpreting the facial expressions in A Better Tomorrow. The fact that A Better Tomorrow expresses only dressed, tamed male may be interpreted as consuming the images of Asian male, which is undersexed or desexualized, thus Western male audiences could accept the film series without feeling threatened. Slow motion and long takes with music are used in the battle scenes of A Better Tomorrow to emphasize the importance of emotions the main characters share, which is solemn and tragic feelings as they try to defend friendship, loyalty and honor. On the other hand, Rambo’s body in close-ups makes the audience to concentrate on the fragmented body rather than the emotive feelings, thus to materialize and to desire his body as a sexual object.

    The cultural and psychological backgrounds are also different. Rambo inherits individualism, which is found in the tradition of mythical heroes of the West, and it fits to the film’s theme:the individual’s struggle against an unjust system. On the other hand, the protagonists in A Better Tomorrow put the highest values on the brotherhood, not a literal but figurative one bound with loyalty and honor. Wide shots place the protagonists in the same frame and symbolize the brotherhood of enduring and struggling through all the hardships together. The roots of such brotherhood can be found in Chinese cultural sentiments that values heart and emotive feelings among people rather than reason or principles, and in the Chinese classic literature, The Romance of the Three Kingdoms.

    Lastly, but not least, the common factor between Rambo films and A Better Tomorrow sequels seems not only interesting but also meaningful. It is nothing but the fact that so-called love interests or physical affection with females do not exist. It is just like the lonely hero walking into the sunset in Western genre or Batman who has problems being in a serious relationship with a woman. In short, John Woo’s romantic gangster films share Hollywood’s strategy to deny the hero's relationship with females and to focus on the male hero. And, by doing so, they efficiently moderate and deliver unfamiliar concept of Eastern masculinity represented by brotherhood in male community.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Anne Cieko, "Transnational Action, in Transnational Chinese Cinema s:Identity, Nationhood, Gender" Univ. of HawaⅡ Press 1997

    2 Lo Kuan-chung, "Three Kingdoms" Pantheon Books 1976

    3 William Warner, "Spectacular Action:Rambo and the Popular Pleasures of Pain" Routledge 1991

    4 Tony Williams, "Space, Place and Spectacle:The Crisis of Cinema of John Woo" 36 (36): 1997

    5 Rikke Schubart, "Passion and Acceleration:Generic Change in the Action Film"

    6 Park Hye-eun, "NAVER Movie Cover story no.799 Special Movie Edition"

    7 Steve Neale, "Masculinity as Spectacle:Reflections on Men and Mainstream Cinema" Oxford University Press 2000

    8 Chris Holmlund, "Masculinity as Multiple Masquerade:The “Mature” Stallone and the Stallone Clone, in Screening the Male:Exploring Masculinities in the Hollywood Cinema" Routledge 1993

    9 Richard Fung, "Looking for My Penis:The Eroticized Asian in Gay Male Porn"

    10 "Hong Kong Movie Database"

    1 Anne Cieko, "Transnational Action, in Transnational Chinese Cinema s:Identity, Nationhood, Gender" Univ. of HawaⅡ Press 1997

    2 Lo Kuan-chung, "Three Kingdoms" Pantheon Books 1976

    3 William Warner, "Spectacular Action:Rambo and the Popular Pleasures of Pain" Routledge 1991

    4 Tony Williams, "Space, Place and Spectacle:The Crisis of Cinema of John Woo" 36 (36): 1997

    5 Rikke Schubart, "Passion and Acceleration:Generic Change in the Action Film"

    6 Park Hye-eun, "NAVER Movie Cover story no.799 Special Movie Edition"

    7 Steve Neale, "Masculinity as Spectacle:Reflections on Men and Mainstream Cinema" Oxford University Press 2000

    8 Chris Holmlund, "Masculinity as Multiple Masquerade:The “Mature” Stallone and the Stallone Clone, in Screening the Male:Exploring Masculinities in the Hollywood Cinema" Routledge 1993

    9 Richard Fung, "Looking for My Penis:The Eroticized Asian in Gay Male Porn"

    10 "Hong Kong Movie Database"

    11 Jenny Lau, "A Cultural Interpetation of the Popular Cinema of China and Hong Kong, in Perspectives on Chinese Cinema" British Film Institute 1991

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2018 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재후보1차)
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-05-02 학회명변경 영문명 : Visual Art Society -> Association of Image & Film Studies KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.46 0.46 0.39
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.34 0.29 0.852 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼