RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    自由選擇 놀이學習이 科學的 推理力 發達에 미치는 影響 = The Impact of the Freechoice Play Learning on Development of the Scientific Reasoning on Children

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2096677

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    1. The Purposes of this Study
    The purposes of this study was to examine, through an experience approach, the impact of the free choice play learning on development of the scientific reasoning on children. For these purposes, there were two groups of O group and T group, O group was the free choice play learning group and T group was the teacher's indicated play learning group, in other words, O group was open education system and T group was traditional education system. And for to experiments the scientific reasoing implemented nonegocentrism, conservation, classification on children two groups.
    The problems of this stady intended to clarify were as the follows.
    (1) The impact of the free choice play learning group and the teacher indicated play learning group on development of the nonegocentrism.
    (2) The impact of the free choice play learing group and the teacher indicated play learning group on development of the conservation.
    (3) The impact of the free choice play learning group and the teacher indicated play learning group on development of the classification.
    2. Method
    The 101 subjects was randomly sampled two preschools in Seoul and Pusan. Children of 50 were two groups of 20 children 4 years old and 30 children 5 years old in the free choice play learning group. 51 children were two groups of 19 children 4 years old and 32 children 5 years old in the teacher indicated play learning group.
    Tools used in this study were the nonegocentrism test of ser tasks devised by Feffer & Grourewitch(1960) and the conservation test of four tasks devised by Piaget and the classification tests of four tasks devised by Piaget (1941).
    3. Findings
    The major findings of the study were as follows.
    (1) The impact of the free choice play learning group and the teacher indicated play learnig group in development of child's nonegocentrism (Hypothesis Ⅰ) was accepted in 5 years old and was rejected in 4 years old (table 1)
    (2) The impact of the free choice play learning group and the teacher indicate play learning group in development of child's conservation. (Hypothesis Ⅱ) was rejected together 4 years old or 5 years old (table 2)
    (3) The impact of the free choice play learning group and the teacher indicated play learning group in development of child's classification (Hypothsis Ⅲ) was positived together 4 years old or 5 years old (table 3).
    번역하기

    1. The Purposes of this Study The purposes of this study was to examine, through an experience approach, the impact of the free choice play learning on development of the scientific reasoning on children. For these purposes, there were two groups of ...

    1. The Purposes of this Study
    The purposes of this study was to examine, through an experience approach, the impact of the free choice play learning on development of the scientific reasoning on children. For these purposes, there were two groups of O group and T group, O group was the free choice play learning group and T group was the teacher's indicated play learning group, in other words, O group was open education system and T group was traditional education system. And for to experiments the scientific reasoing implemented nonegocentrism, conservation, classification on children two groups.
    The problems of this stady intended to clarify were as the follows.
    (1) The impact of the free choice play learning group and the teacher indicated play learning group on development of the nonegocentrism.
    (2) The impact of the free choice play learing group and the teacher indicated play learning group on development of the conservation.
    (3) The impact of the free choice play learning group and the teacher indicated play learning group on development of the classification.
    2. Method
    The 101 subjects was randomly sampled two preschools in Seoul and Pusan. Children of 50 were two groups of 20 children 4 years old and 30 children 5 years old in the free choice play learning group. 51 children were two groups of 19 children 4 years old and 32 children 5 years old in the teacher indicated play learning group.
    Tools used in this study were the nonegocentrism test of ser tasks devised by Feffer & Grourewitch(1960) and the conservation test of four tasks devised by Piaget and the classification tests of four tasks devised by Piaget (1941).
    3. Findings
    The major findings of the study were as follows.
    (1) The impact of the free choice play learning group and the teacher indicated play learnig group in development of child's nonegocentrism (Hypothesis Ⅰ) was accepted in 5 years old and was rejected in 4 years old (table 1)
    (2) The impact of the free choice play learning group and the teacher indicate play learning group in development of child's conservation. (Hypothesis Ⅱ) was rejected together 4 years old or 5 years old (table 2)
    (3) The impact of the free choice play learning group and the teacher indicated play learning group in development of child's classification (Hypothsis Ⅲ) was positived together 4 years old or 5 years old (table 3).

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 序論
    • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적
    • 2. 용언의 정의
    • 3. 연구의 제한점
    • Ⅱ. 理論的 背景
    • Ⅰ. 序論
    • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적
    • 2. 용언의 정의
    • 3. 연구의 제한점
    • Ⅱ. 理論的 背景
    • 1. 성장과 발달에 관한 제 견해
    • 2. 놀이의 정의와 교육적 가치
    • 3. 자유선택 놀이학습
    • 4. 과학적 추리
    • Ⅲ. 연구문제 및 가설
    • Ⅳ. 硏究의 方法 및 節次
    • 1. 硏究對象
    • 2. 측정도구 및 實驗
    • 2. 분류 개념 측정도구
    • 3. 보존개념 측정도구
    • 3. 자료처리 및 통계적 방법
    • Ⅴ. 硏究結果 및 解釋
    • 1. 假設1의 檢證 結果는 다음과 같다.
    • 2. 假設2의 檢證結果는 다음과 같다.
    • 3. 假設3의 檢證結果는 다음과 같다.
    • Ⅵ. 結果 및 諸言
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼