RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보 SCOPUS

    진료수행시험에서 표준화 환자 채점의 정확도 = Standardized Patients' Accuracy in Recording Checklist Items during Clinical Performance Examinations

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104018317

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: Standardized patients participate in clinical performance examinations not only to simulate case scenarios but also to evaluate the performance of students using a checklist. The accuracy in checking off checklist items is one of the most important factors determining the reliability of this examination. The purposes of this study were to determine the SP's overall accuracy in recording checklist items, and whether their accuracy was affected by certain characteristics of checklist items.
    Methods: Three professors, who have been fully involved in scenario development and SP training, reviewed videotapes of the examination and evaluated the performance of the students using the same checklist. SP's checklists were marked on this ‘correct checklist’. The checklists and checklist guidelines of the items marked under the score of 50 out of 100 were analyzed.
    Results: Results showed that the accuracy of the SP's in recording checklist items was 86.9% and was affected by certain characteristics, such as complexity or ambiguity of checklists and checklist guidelines.
    Conclusion: In this study, the SP's accuracy in recording checklist items was good to very good, and the result suggested that the accuracy could be improved by the elaboration of checklists and checklist guidelines.
    번역하기

    Purpose: Standardized patients participate in clinical performance examinations not only to simulate case scenarios but also to evaluate the performance of students using a checklist. The accuracy in checking off checklist items is one of the most imp...

    Purpose: Standardized patients participate in clinical performance examinations not only to simulate case scenarios but also to evaluate the performance of students using a checklist. The accuracy in checking off checklist items is one of the most important factors determining the reliability of this examination. The purposes of this study were to determine the SP's overall accuracy in recording checklist items, and whether their accuracy was affected by certain characteristics of checklist items.
    Methods: Three professors, who have been fully involved in scenario development and SP training, reviewed videotapes of the examination and evaluated the performance of the students using the same checklist. SP's checklists were marked on this ‘correct checklist’. The checklists and checklist guidelines of the items marked under the score of 50 out of 100 were analyzed.
    Results: Results showed that the accuracy of the SP's in recording checklist items was 86.9% and was affected by certain characteristics, such as complexity or ambiguity of checklists and checklist guidelines.
    Conclusion: In this study, the SP's accuracy in recording checklist items was good to very good, and the result suggested that the accuracy could be improved by the elaboration of checklists and checklist guidelines.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "일개 의과대학에서 실시한 표준화 환자를 이용한 임상수행능력평가시험 결과 분석" 16 (16): 51-61, 2004

    2 "객관구조화진료시험에서 교수와 표준화 환자 사이의 점검표 채점의 일치도" 15 (15): 141-150, 2003

    3 "standardized assessment of clinical competence" 482-9, 1987

    4 "patients' accuracy in recording clinical performance check-list items" 99-104, 1992

    5 "Sources of unreliability and bias in standardized patient rating Teaching and Lear ning in Medicine" 74-85, 1991

    6 "Simulated patients in general practice a different look at the consultation" 809-12, 1987

    7 "Psychometric characteristics of the objective structured clinical examination" 335-41, 1988

    8 "Measuring physician performance by using simulated patients" 60 : 925-34, 1985

    9 "Evaluating the clinical skills of foreign medical school graduates participating in an internship preparation program" 391-4, 1990

    1 "일개 의과대학에서 실시한 표준화 환자를 이용한 임상수행능력평가시험 결과 분석" 16 (16): 51-61, 2004

    2 "객관구조화진료시험에서 교수와 표준화 환자 사이의 점검표 채점의 일치도" 15 (15): 141-150, 2003

    3 "standardized assessment of clinical competence" 482-9, 1987

    4 "patients' accuracy in recording clinical performance check-list items" 99-104, 1992

    5 "Sources of unreliability and bias in standardized patient rating Teaching and Lear ning in Medicine" 74-85, 1991

    6 "Simulated patients in general practice a different look at the consultation" 809-12, 1987

    7 "Psychometric characteristics of the objective structured clinical examination" 335-41, 1988

    8 "Measuring physician performance by using simulated patients" 60 : 925-34, 1985

    9 "Evaluating the clinical skills of foreign medical school graduates participating in an internship preparation program" 391-4, 1990

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-07-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국의학교육 -> Korean Journal of Medical Education
    외국어명 : korean journal of medical education -> 미등록
    KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.02 1.02 0.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.82 0.76 1.204 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼