The legal system in Korea mainly consists of statutes. But, precedents are regarded as a essential component of Korean legal system. Precedents have enriched contents of law and developed law. Now precedents play an important part in law a...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76468541
2006
-
판례 ; 판례평석 ; 법학방법론 ; 민법 ; 법원(法源) ; Precedents ; Commentary on Judgement ; Legal Method ; Civil Law ; Sources of Law
360
KCI등재
학술저널
741-765(25쪽)
8
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The legal system in Korea mainly consists of statutes. But, precedents are regarded as a essential component of Korean legal system. Precedents have enriched contents of law and developed law. Now precedents play an important part in law a...
The legal system in Korea mainly consists of statutes. But, precedents are regarded as a essential component of Korean legal system. Precedents have enriched contents of law and developed law. Now precedents play an important part in law and legal science in civil-law system as well as in common-law system.<BR> It is commentary on judgement that analyses the content of precedents and evaluates correctness/reasonableness of precedents. Commentary functions like a bridge that connects between precedents and legal doctrines. Precedents remain live through commentaries on the precedents. Commentary on judgement will provide legal scholars and practioners with the common forum of legal studies.<BR> Each country has its own method of commentary on judgement related to legal systems, legal institution and legal culture at various levels. Above all, there is an indissoluble connection between commentary on judgement and the status of precedents in legal system concerned. The different status of precedents in each legal system demands for different method of commentary on judgement. Secondarily, commentaries on judgement are connected with the objects, the contents, the structures and the styles of judicial judgements. Commentaries on judgement, furthermore, are connected with openness of judgement and access to judgement, the interrelation between precedents and legal doctrines, the realities of legislation, the legal sentiment, the legal consciousness.<BR> So, it is necessary to investigate into the structure, procedure and function of judiciary system as well as the status of precedents, the style of judgement in order to advance a theory of commentary on judgement. Then the complete standard model of commentary on judgement can be presented.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "판례의 형성과정 민사판례연구" 박영사 330-, 1979
2 "판례연구의 중점변천" 1974.3.4/11.
3 "판례연구의 목적 민사판례연구" 박영사 370-, 1979
4 "판례연구와 법학교육 민사판례연구" 박영사 1979
5 "판례법의 법원성" 박영사 1-26, 1996
6 "판결서 글쓰기에 관한 몇 가지 생각들" 14 : 372-411, 2005
7 "법획득방법의 기본구조에서 본 법학과 법실무" 법문사 263-277, 2001
8 "민사판례연구" 대법원ㆍ대법원판결 박영사 391-, 1979
9 "민사판결서의 간이화" 법문사 277-279, 1999
10 "대법원전원합의체재판에 있어서의 의견의 표시 사실심과 법률심" 한국사법행정학회 680-, 1994
1 "판례의 형성과정 민사판례연구" 박영사 330-, 1979
2 "판례연구의 중점변천" 1974.3.4/11.
3 "판례연구의 목적 민사판례연구" 박영사 370-, 1979
4 "판례연구와 법학교육 민사판례연구" 박영사 1979
5 "판례법의 법원성" 박영사 1-26, 1996
6 "판결서 글쓰기에 관한 몇 가지 생각들" 14 : 372-411, 2005
7 "법획득방법의 기본구조에서 본 법학과 법실무" 법문사 263-277, 2001
8 "민사판례연구" 대법원ㆍ대법원판결 박영사 391-, 1979
9 "민사판결서의 간이화" 법문사 277-279, 1999
10 "대법원전원합의체재판에 있어서의 의견의 표시 사실심과 법률심" 한국사법행정학회 680-, 1994
11 "民法硏究 Handbook" 有斐閣 2000.
12 "Legal Institutions and the Sources of Law" Springer 2005.
13 "Interpreting Precedents" Ashgate 1997.
14 "Einfhrung in das juristische Denken" 1977.
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2000-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.07 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.176 | 0.45 |