RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    1908년 <민사소송법안>의 성립과 그 성격 = The Apearance and Characteristics of Bills of Civil Procedure Code made in 1908 Korea

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Japanese civil proceedural laws had been adopted in Korean legal system before the implementation of the current counterparts. Until 1912, the “Civil and Criminal Procedure Act”(民刑訴訟規則) established in the 13th of July in 1908 were applied, and they were acknowledged as the establishments of modern civil proceeding system. In the same year of their announcements,the “Bills of Civil Procedure Code”(民事訴訟法案) were made by the famous Japanese scholar Dr. Kenjiro Ume(梅謙次郞), which was not implemented.
    The Bills of Civil Procedure Code should be investigated to establish the history of Korean civil proceeding laws. Furthermore the study on this bills can be a stepping stone to the new understanding of Japan's role on Korean legal system. Past studies shows that the bills are composed of two thing.
    The original one was made and then some items of it were deleted later.
    Furthermore the Civil and Criminal Procedure Act was also written by Dr.
    Ume. This essay shows, however, that it was not the authorship of Ume as opposed to the general opinion and the appearance of the Act and the Bills might reveal the different opinions around the codification in early 20C Korea, and that the Bill written later was the improvement of the earlier version.
    번역하기

    Japanese civil proceedural laws had been adopted in Korean legal system before the implementation of the current counterparts. Until 1912, the “Civil and Criminal Procedure Act”(民刑訴訟規則) established in the 13th of July in 1908 were appl...

    Japanese civil proceedural laws had been adopted in Korean legal system before the implementation of the current counterparts. Until 1912, the “Civil and Criminal Procedure Act”(民刑訴訟規則) established in the 13th of July in 1908 were applied, and they were acknowledged as the establishments of modern civil proceeding system. In the same year of their announcements,the “Bills of Civil Procedure Code”(民事訴訟法案) were made by the famous Japanese scholar Dr. Kenjiro Ume(梅謙次郞), which was not implemented.
    The Bills of Civil Procedure Code should be investigated to establish the history of Korean civil proceeding laws. Furthermore the study on this bills can be a stepping stone to the new understanding of Japan's role on Korean legal system. Past studies shows that the bills are composed of two thing.
    The original one was made and then some items of it were deleted later.
    Furthermore the Civil and Criminal Procedure Act was also written by Dr.
    Ume. This essay shows, however, that it was not the authorship of Ume as opposed to the general opinion and the appearance of the Act and the Bills might reveal the different opinions around the codification in early 20C Korea, and that the Bill written later was the improvement of the earlier version.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 전봉덕, "한국사법제도사5" 1976

    2 정종휴, "한국 民事訴訟法案」" (10) : 1989

    3 윤철홍, "프랑스革命과 民法의 發展" 10 : 1989

    4 "통감부문서 제4권" 국사편찬위원회 1999

    5 정종휴, "관습조사보고서" 한국법제연구원 2000

    6 김상수, "韓國法の歷史·その2 ~梅謙次郞の京城滯在" 30 (30): 2002

    7 "韓國司法界の往事を語る座談會" 19 (19): 1940

    8 李英美, "韓國司法制度と梅謙次郞" 政法大學出版局 2005

    9 梅謙次郞, "韓國の合邦論と立法事業" 8 (8): 1910

    10 손경찬, "開化期近代的民事訴訟法制導入에 관한 硏究" 서울대학교 2004

    1 전봉덕, "한국사법제도사5" 1976

    2 정종휴, "한국 民事訴訟法案」" (10) : 1989

    3 윤철홍, "프랑스革命과 民法의 發展" 10 : 1989

    4 "통감부문서 제4권" 국사편찬위원회 1999

    5 정종휴, "관습조사보고서" 한국법제연구원 2000

    6 김상수, "韓國法の歷史·その2 ~梅謙次郞の京城滯在" 30 (30): 2002

    7 "韓國司法界の往事を語る座談會" 19 (19): 1940

    8 李英美, "韓國司法制度と梅謙次郞" 政法大學出版局 2005

    9 梅謙次郞, "韓國の合邦論と立法事業" 8 (8): 1910

    10 손경찬, "開化期近代的民事訴訟法制導入에 관한 硏究" 서울대학교 2004

    11 히로노리, "訴狀·答辯書제도에 관한 比較法制史的硏究‑ 韓國民事訴訟法制定에 있어서의 日本法을 통한 獨逸法의 影響‑" 서울대학교 2006

    12 吉井啓子, "舊民法講義三部作を讀む" 日本評論社 1998

    13 "法典調査局官制(융희 원년 12월 23일 칙령 제61호)"

    14 정종휴, "梅謙次郞と韓國近代立法事業, in 法律時報" 日本評論社 1998

    15 吉井啓子, "梅謙次郞と舊民法證據編" (11) : 2002

    16 朝鮮總督府中樞院, "朝鮮舊慣制度調査事業槪要" 16-, 1938

    17 朝鮮總督府法務局法務課, "朝鮮の司法制度(昭和十年朝鮮總督府施政二十五年祈念)" 1936

    18 金正明, "日韓外交資料集成" 1964

    19 梅謙次郞, "日本民法證據編講義" 新靑出版 2002

    20 南基正, "日帝의 韓國司法府侵略實話" 育法社 1978

    21 "大韓協會會報 제3호(1908. 6), 제4호(1908. 7), 제5호(1908. 8)"

    22 東川德治, "博土梅謙次郞" 法政大學 1917

    23 "內閣往復文(서울대학교 규장각 소장)"

    24 森山茂德, "保護政治下韓國における司法制度改革の理念と現實, in 植民地帝國日本の法的構造" 信山社 2004

    25 손경찬, "≪民刑訴訟規則≫의 制定과 意義" 한국법사학회 (30) : 159-185, 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.31 0.31 0.49
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.5 0.606 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼