RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    법정언어에 관한 인류학적 연구 -국민참여재판에서의 문화적,상호교섭적 측면을 중심으로- = Anthropological Study of Court Talk -Cultural and Interactive Aspects in Korean Jury Trials-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82648654

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper aims to investigate the usefulness of the anthropological approaches to the study of the adjudication and to examine the court talks that are manifested in the jury trials in Korea. Linguistic arguments in the court can have some regularity in communication styles and in delivering forms and they are received differently in terms of persuasion and reliability. In this study, a total of 17 jury trials, between February 2009 and August 2009, were observed. Court languages used in the testimony in four cases were transcribed and analyzed. Speech styles in Korean jury trials reflect the similar patterns as foreign cases, such as ``powerful-powerless speeches,`` and ``rule-based vs. relation-based`` speeches, and these initial results may be used to further the analysis in the future studies. In addition, several speech strategies suggesting patriarchal, emotional, regionalistic aspects are frequently manifested in the data. Participants in the court proceedings use these strategies to convince the jurors to look into the social context in the light of their common sense. Differences in social status exist in addition to differences in speech styles and orientations. Future studies on how these differences are evaluated during the process of deliberation will demonstrate how relevant and useful the court talk studies will be in linking empirical linguistic data and the macro social phenomena.
    번역하기

    This paper aims to investigate the usefulness of the anthropological approaches to the study of the adjudication and to examine the court talks that are manifested in the jury trials in Korea. Linguistic arguments in the court can have some regularity...

    This paper aims to investigate the usefulness of the anthropological approaches to the study of the adjudication and to examine the court talks that are manifested in the jury trials in Korea. Linguistic arguments in the court can have some regularity in communication styles and in delivering forms and they are received differently in terms of persuasion and reliability. In this study, a total of 17 jury trials, between February 2009 and August 2009, were observed. Court languages used in the testimony in four cases were transcribed and analyzed. Speech styles in Korean jury trials reflect the similar patterns as foreign cases, such as ``powerful-powerless speeches,`` and ``rule-based vs. relation-based`` speeches, and these initial results may be used to further the analysis in the future studies. In addition, several speech strategies suggesting patriarchal, emotional, regionalistic aspects are frequently manifested in the data. Participants in the court proceedings use these strategies to convince the jurors to look into the social context in the light of their common sense. Differences in social status exist in addition to differences in speech styles and orientations. Future studies on how these differences are evaluated during the process of deliberation will demonstrate how relevant and useful the court talk studies will be in linking empirical linguistic data and the macro social phenomena.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박광배, "형사배심 평의에서의 사회적 동조와 인지적 전향:한국 최초의 시민배심 모의재판의 평의에 대한 내용분석" 한국사회및성격심리학회 19 (19): 1-21, 2005

    2 이재협, "한국의 법률직 TV 드라마에 나타난 법의식과 법률가의 이미지 - <애드버킷>에서 <검사 프린세스>까지" 법학연구소 51 (51): 357-410, 2010

    3 김상준, "재판과 법관의 의사결정, In 법관의 의사결정: 이론과 실무" 사법발전재단 2010

    4 앨런 바너드, "인류학의 역사와 이론" 한길사 198-215, 2003

    5 헨리메인, "유언상속의 초기역사 <고대법> 제6장" 49 (49): 2008

    6 왕한석, "언어와 사회: 의사소통의 민족지학 입문" 한국문화사 2009

    7 이재협, "미국 배심제에 대한 법인류학적 고찰 - 과학주의의 관점에서 본 미국 배심제의 논리 -" 법학연구소 50 (50): 337-377, 2009

    8 브라니슬라프 말리노프스키, "미개사회의 범죄와 관습" 책세상 2010

    9 한인섭, "국민의 사법참여" 경인문화사 2010

    10 법원행정처, "구술심리연구반 연구결과 자료집" 법원행정처 2009

    1 박광배, "형사배심 평의에서의 사회적 동조와 인지적 전향:한국 최초의 시민배심 모의재판의 평의에 대한 내용분석" 한국사회및성격심리학회 19 (19): 1-21, 2005

    2 이재협, "한국의 법률직 TV 드라마에 나타난 법의식과 법률가의 이미지 - <애드버킷>에서 <검사 프린세스>까지" 법학연구소 51 (51): 357-410, 2010

    3 김상준, "재판과 법관의 의사결정, In 법관의 의사결정: 이론과 실무" 사법발전재단 2010

    4 앨런 바너드, "인류학의 역사와 이론" 한길사 198-215, 2003

    5 헨리메인, "유언상속의 초기역사 <고대법> 제6장" 49 (49): 2008

    6 왕한석, "언어와 사회: 의사소통의 민족지학 입문" 한국문화사 2009

    7 이재협, "미국 배심제에 대한 법인류학적 고찰 - 과학주의의 관점에서 본 미국 배심제의 논리 -" 법학연구소 50 (50): 337-377, 2009

    8 브라니슬라프 말리노프스키, "미개사회의 범죄와 관습" 책세상 2010

    9 한인섭, "국민의 사법참여" 경인문화사 2010

    10 법원행정처, "구술심리연구반 연구결과 자료집" 법원행정처 2009

    11 박광배, "가상적인 재판 쟁점에서의 현역판사의 판단과 모의배심의 집단판단에 대한 인지적 방략의 효과" 한국문화및사회문제심리학회 11 (11): 59-84, 2005

    12 Matoesian, Gregory, "“I’m sorry we had to meet under these circumstances”: Verbal Artistry (and Wizardry) in the Kennedy Smith Rape Trial, In Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law" Ashgate 1997

    13 Conley, John M., "to the Trobriands: The Enduring Influence of Malinowski's Crime and Custom in Savage Society" 27 : 2002

    14 Pennington, Nancy, "The Story Model for Juror Decision Making, In Inside the Juror: The Psychology of Juror Decision Making" Cambridge University Press 1993

    15 Heffer, Chris, "The Language of Jury Trial: A Corpus-Aided Analysis of Legal-Lay Discourse" Palgrave 2005

    16 Gluckmnan, Max, "The Judicial Process Among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia" Free Press 1955

    17 Nader, Laura, "The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies" Columbia Univ. Press 1978

    18 Llewellyn, Karl N, "The Cheyenne Way" Univ. of Oklahoma Press 1941

    19 Kalven, Harry Jr, "The American Jury" Univ. of Chicago Press 1966

    20 Garfinkel, Harold, "Studies in Ethnomethodology" Prentice Hall 1967

    21 Conley, Robin, "Stories from the Jury Room: How Jurors Use Narrative to Process Evidence" 49 : 2009

    22 Conley, John M, "Rules versus Relationship: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse" Univ. of Chicago Press 1990

    23 Bennet, W. Lance, "Reconstructing reality in the courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture" Rutgers University Press 1981

    24 Bourdieu, Pierre, "Outline of a Theory of Practice" Cambridge Univ. Press 1977

    25 kinson, J. Maxwell, "Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings" MacMillan Press 1979

    26 Maynard, D. W, "On the Sociology of Justice: Theoretical Notes from an Actual Jury Deliberation" 11 : 1993

    27 Amsterdam, Anthony G, "Minding the Law" Harvard Univ. Press 2000

    28 O'Barr, Willaim M., "Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power, and Strategy in the Courtroom" Academic Press 1982

    29 Donovan, James M., "Legal Anthropology: An Introduction" AltaMira Press 2008

    30 Brooks, Peter, "Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law" Yale Univ. Press 1996

    31 Bohannan, Paul, "Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv" Waveland Press 1957

    32 Conley, John M., "Just Words: Law, Language, and Power" Univ. of Chicago Press 2005

    33 Diamond, Shari, "Jury Room Ruminations on Forbidden Topics" 87 : 2001

    34 Bornstein, Brian, "Jurors of the Absurd? The Role of Consequentiality in Jury Simulation Research" 32 : 2005

    35 Hans, Valerie, "Judging the Jury" Basic Books 1986

    36 Ensenberg, Theodore, "Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication Kalven Zeisel’s The American Jury" 2 : 2004

    37 Philips, Susan, "Ideology in the Language of Judges: How Judges Practice Law, Politics, and Courtroom Control" Oxford Univ. Press 1998

    38 Park, Kwangbai, "Estimating Juror Accuracy, Juror Ability, and the Relationship Between Them" KLUWER ACADEMIC/PLENUM PUBL 0 (0): 1-18, 2010

    39 Drew, Paul, "Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape, In Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law" Ashgate 1997

    40 Grimshaw, Allen D, "Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigation of Arguments in Conversations" Cambridge Univ. Press 1990

    41 Vidmar, Neil, "American Juries: The Verdict" Prometheus Books 2007

    42 Bruner, Jerome S., "Acts of Meaning" Harvard Univ. Press 1990

    43 Diamond, Shari, "A Courtroom Experiment on Juror Selection and Decision-Making" 1 : 1974

    44 법인행정처, "2008년-2010년 국민참여재판 성과 분석" 사법정책실 2011

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.55 1.55 1.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.24 1.24 1.583 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼