가새를 설치한 조립식 스틸 구조의 반응수정계수 평가 = Evaluation of R-Factor for Cold-Formed Steel Frames with Shear Panels

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of cold-formed steel (CFS) frames with shear panels designed under current U.S. design codes and standards of practice. The response modification factor, R, of the cold-formed steel structural system was examined using the rational approach proposed by Foutch and Wilcoski. The approach is based on the performance evaluation method developed from the SAC project. The target is to achieve a 90% confidence level in satisfying the Collapse Prevention(CP) performance level for a hazard level with 2% probability of being exceeded in 50 years. New values for various parameters were decided for CFS buildings because parameters from SAC project were for steel moment frame buildings.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "State of the Art Report on Performance Prediction and Evaluation of Steel Moment-Frame Buildings" Federal Emergency Management Agency 2000

2 "Specification for the design of cold-formed steel structure members" 2002

3 "Shear Wall Resistance of Lightgage Steel Stud Wall Systems" 1-14, 1990

4 "Shaketable Tests of Cold-Formed Steel Shear Panel" 1462-1470, 2006

5 "Seismic Performance of Wall-Stud Shear Walls" 483-500, 2002

6 "R-Factor Project Validation Test Plan and Preliminary Results" 2002

7 "Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines" 526-533, 2002

8 "Performance Prediction and Evaluation of Low Ductility Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Loads" 2000

9 "Performance Evaluation of New Steel Frame Buildings for Seismic Loads" 653-670, 2002

10 "Incremental Dynamic Analysis" Incremental Dynamic Analysis 491-514, 2001

11 "Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project" 1997

12 "Design of Cold-Formed Load Bearing Steel Systems and Masonry Veneer / Steel Stud Walls" -07, 2002

13 "A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor (DCFD) seismic formats" Stanford Univ 2002

14 "A Rational Approach for Determining Response Modification Factors for Seismic Design of Buildings Using Current Code Provisions" 339-352, 2005

15 "A Note on the Application of Incremental Dynamic Analysis for Determining Collapse Drift of Structures" 2004

16 "2003 Edition: NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, Part 1 - Provisions" -450, 2003