주주축출의 정당성과 그 한계 = Ground of Squeeze-out of Minority Shareholders and its Limits

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It is an established principle that corporate shareholders can participate in the management of the company by exercising voting rights in proportion to the number of shares owned, and as co-owners and investors of the company, they can receive profit dividends or distribution of residual assets from the company according to the same principle. The protection of Shareholders’ rights regarding dominant interests and property interests is an essential requirement of the Company Law that must be taken into consideration when a corporation issues shares or carries out the reorganization of company.
In response to changes in the economic environment, the Company Law has introduced the cash-out merger and the acquisition of all the shares of minority shareholders, etc. to change or reorganize a corporate mechanism or business. These statutes aim to advance the efficient and flexible operation of the company. At this time, the basic principle is to maintain the status of shareholders or their investment opportunities. But in the interest of advancing the efficient and flexible operation of the company, cash-out merger, etc. should be permitted in spite of the opposition of minorities. At this time, it is necessary to protect minority shareholders who will lose, in effect, their shareholder status against their will.
As one of the methods, it is examined whether the company's business purposes is necessary to eliminate the minority shareholders. While introducing the acquisition of all minority shares, the Company Law strictly establishes the qualifications of controlling shareholder and requires the legitimate business purpose as an affirmative requirement. But it does not set this in the case of a freeze-out merger. As a result, it is questionable whether the mere fact that the merger ratio is fair and that the opposite shareholders are given the appraisal right justifies the squeeze-out of minority shareholders and provides a enough protection for minority shareholders.
In this paper, first I will describes the squeeze-out statutes in the Company Law. I will examine the function and meaning of legitimate business purpose according to whether it is stated as a requirement or not. Based on this, I will explain whether minority shareholders can be protected by invalidating a transaction for the squeeze-out of shareholders that has no valid business purpose or violates the equality of shareholders. Finally I will provide the conclusion about the limits of shareholder squeeze-out and the methods of protection of minority shareholders.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이철송, "회사법강의" 박영사 2021

2 안성포, "헌법상 소수파주주의 재산권보장에 관한 연구 - 회사법개정에 있어서 헌법상의 한계를 중심으로 -" 한국기업법학회 22 (22): 151-183, 2008

3 송종준, "폐쇄기업화거래의 공정요건과 소수파주주의 보호" 19 (19): 2000

4 김지환, "주식병합을 통한 소수주주축출 문제 해결 방안" 한국상사법학회 40 (40): 171-207, 2021

5 김재범, "주식병합에 의한 소수주주의 축출" 한국상사판례학회 34 (34): 75-110, 2021

6 황현영, "소수주주축출의 실무상 쟁점과 향후 과제" 대한변호사협회 (461) : 46-62, 2016

7 김경일, "소수주주축출에 관한 영국의 법리 연구" 한국상사법학회 36 (36): 347-374, 2017

8 송종준, "소수주주 강제퇴출법제의 국제적 신조류와 그 입법론적 수용 가능성 -미국,영국,독일법의 비교분석을 중심으로-" 한국증권법학회 6 (6): 1-38, 2005

9 강대섭, "상법판례백선" 법문사 2023

10 박창규, "상법상 소수주식 전부취득제의 경영상 목적에 관한 연구" 법무부 (98) : 87-118, 2022

11 송옥렬, "상법강의" 弘文社 2018

12 김홍기, "상법강의" 박영사 [서울] 2022

13 최병규, "독일의 Squeeze-Out제도에 관한 연구" 14 : 2003

14 石田眞得, "米國會社法判例の最近の狀況" (2146) : 2017

15 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法" 有斐閣 2006

16 櫻澤降哉, "株式の倂合による少數株主の締出しと株主總會決議の瑕疵" (22) : 2022

17 大塚章男, "少數株主の締ぬ出しと株主平等原則に關する一考察[下]" (1879) : 2009

18 大塚章男, "スクイーズアウトにおける｢事業目的基準｣の有用性" (2) : 2007

19 이상훈, "‘합병비율 불공정’과 구제수단―비판과 대안: ‘불공정’의 재정의(再定義)와 신주의 추가발행―" 한국증권법학회 18 (18): 35-80, 2017

20 Hideki Kanda, "The Appraisal Remedy and the Goals of Corporate Law" 32 : 1985

21 Lewis D. Solomon, "Ronald J. Gilson & Jeffrey N. Gordon, “Controlling Controlling Shareholders" 152 : 2003

22 김재형, "M&A대가의 유연화와 현금지불합병" 한국사법학회 10 (10): 349-372, 2003

23 Bernard S. Sharfman, "Kahn v. M&F Worldwide Corporation: A Small but Significant Step Forward in the War Against Frivolous Shareholder Lawsuits" 40 (40): 2014

24 Jason M. Quintana, "Going Private Transanctions : Delaware’s Race to the Bottom?" 2004 (2004): 2004

25 William J. Carney, "Fundamental Corporate Changes, Minority Shareholders, and Business Purposes" 1980 : 1980

26 藤田友敬, "(江頭憲治郞還曆記念) 企業法の理論[上卷]" 商事法務 2007